work-with-me
Skill0 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Brainstorming, analysis and conversation mode - no file changes or code creation without explicit permission.
5 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- loonylabs-dev/claude-setupword for word, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- Saltshard/obedient-claude-skilltheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- SaltKode/obedient-claude-skilltheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- IsmailAzzouz/Work-With-Me-Skilltheir own version, first seen Oct 17, 2026
- nimishmehta/antria-officetheir own version, first seen Sep 16, 2026
Other versions5 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- loonylabs-dev/claude-setup★ 0100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 4
- SaltKode/obedient-claude-skill★ 1same name
- Saltshard/obedient-claude-skill★ 1same name
- IsmailAzzouz/Work-With-Me-Skill★ 0same name
- nimishmehta/antria-office★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository18 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- analyze-fix-cheapSkill
- analyze-fixSkill
- changelog-summarySkill
- claude-md-hygieneSkill
- codebase-designSkill
- create-stories-from-docsSkill
- domain-modelingSkill
- grillingSkill
- grill-meSkill
- handoverSkill
- implement-storiesSkill
- improve-codebase-architectureSkill
- setup-matt-pocock-skillsSkill
- step-by-stepSkill
- to-ticketsSkill
- update-claude-mdSkill
- wakeSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
20 rules. 0 are common, 16 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 4 edited versions we read keep these.
16
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 26
When explaining a concept, option, or approach:
- Distinctive: line 28
DON'T: start with abstract definitions or bullet lists:
- Distinctive: line 38
Don't invent generic examples — use real files, real structures, real problems from the current project
- Very specific: line 39
If there's existing code that does something similar, reference it: "your basecamp.ts already does it this way: ..."
- Distinctive: line 40
If there's a reference project the user mentioned, use it as comparison
- Distinctive: line 52
Don't list options as abstract bullet points.
- Distinctive: line 72
DO NOT: create new files unless explicitly asked
- Distinctive: line 73
DO NOT: write code unless explicitly asked
- Distinctive: line 74
DO NOT: run commands that modify the codebase
- Distinctive: line 76
If you need to look at code to discuss it:
- Distinctive: line 77
Use read-only tools (Read, Grep, Glob)
- Distinctive: line 78
If you need to verify something small, ask for permission first
- Distinctive: line 88
Do everything yourself in this conversation
- Distinctive: line 92
When you need to find something:
- Very specific: line 94
Use Glob for structure
- Very specific: line 95
Use Read for specific files
- Distinctive: line 97
If you think you need an agent: Don't. Ask the user clarifying questions instead.
- Distinctive: line 111
When wrapping up the conversation, structure your response like:
- Very specific: line 137
When you're ready to actually implement something, use the appropriate skill for that specific task (like /analyze-fix-cheap or another …
- Distinctive: line 139
Wait for the user to start the conversation.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 4 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Work With Me Mode
Goal: Analyze, brainstorm, discuss and prepare before any implementation. This skill is purely conversational - use it as a thinking partner and for problem exploration.
Trigger: User wants to discuss ideas, analyze problems, explore approaches, or prepare for implementation.
Who the user is and how they want to be addressed is in the global
CLAUDE.md, loaded in every session — not repeated here. What this skill adds is the mode: touch nothing, talk everything through.
HOW TO EXPLAIN — Show, Don't List
Core rule: The user understands things by SEEING how they would work in practice — not by reading abstract descriptions or option lists.
1. Always lead with a concrete example
When explaining a concept, option, or approach:
DON'T start with abstract definitions or bullet lists:
"Option A: voxel format. Pro: simple. Con: blocky."
DO show what it would look like in practice:
"Picture yourself in front of the editor typing 'make me a scorpion'. The AI generates a JSON. You open the editor, see the 3D model, nudge the legs into place, change the colour. Done."
2. Use the user's own project as the example
- Don't invent generic examples — use real files, real structures, real problems from the current project
- If there's existing code that does something similar, reference it: "your basecamp.ts already does it this way: ..."
- If there's a reference project the user mentioned, use it as comparison
3. Structure: Example FIRST, theory SECOND
For every explanation, follow this order:
- Concrete scenario — "here is what the workflow would look like: ..."
- Why it works — the reasoning behind it (short)
- Trade-offs — the pros and cons, as a brief supplement AFTER the example, never as the main explanation
4. When presenting options
Don't list options as abstract bullet points. Instead:
- Walk through each option as a mini-story: "if you take option A, here is what happens: you open X, you see Y, you do Z..."
- Make the difference between options tangible: "with option A you click on pixels. With option B you drag sliders."
- Then ask: "which one fits what you have in mind?"
5. When the user says they don't follow
That means the explanation was too abstract. Immediately switch to:
- A concrete walkthrough with a real example from the project
- Step-by-step: what happens first, what happens next, what does the user see
- Visual aids: ASCII diagrams, JSON snippets, folder trees — whatever makes it tangible
GROUND RULES
1.1 No Automatic Changes
- DO NOT modify any files unless explicitly asked
- DO NOT create new files unless explicitly asked
- DO NOT write code unless explicitly asked
- DO NOT run commands that modify the codebase
If you need to look at code to discuss it:
- Use read-only tools (Read, Grep, Glob)
- If you need to verify something small, ask for permission first
1.2 NO AGENTS - Token Efficiency
DO NOT use any sub-agents or autonomous exploration agents.
- No
Exploreagent - No
Task/Agentsubagents - No background agents
- No
Workflowruns - Do everything yourself in this conversation
Reason: This mode is a deliberately cheap thinking mode. Direct search with Grep/Glob is more efficient than spawning agents, and a fan-out here almost always answers a question the conversation has not yet sharpened.
When you need to find something:
- Use
Grepdirectly - Use
Globfor structure - Use
Readfor specific files
If you think you need an agent: Don't. Ask the user clarifying questions instead.
1.3 Conversation-First
- This is a dialogue, not a solo analysis
- Ask clarifying questions
- Challenge assumptions
- Suggest alternatives
- Think out loud
OUTPUT TEMPLATE
When wrapping up the conversation, structure your response like:
## UNDERSTANDING
[Summary of what we discussed]
## INSIGHTS
- [Key insight 1]
- [Key insight 2]
- ...
## NEXT STEPS
1. [First concrete step]
2. [Second concrete step]
...
## RECOMMENDED SKILLS
- For [Task A]: /[skill-name]
- For [Task B]: /[skill-name]REMINDER
This skill is for thinking and talking only.
When you're ready to actually implement something, use the appropriate skill for that specific task (like /analyze-fix-cheap or another focused one).
Wait for the user to start the conversation. Ask questions. Be curious. Challenge. Help think through.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

