incident-postmortem
Skill64 starsChanged 7 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Close the learning loop after a rescue or incident — reconstruct the timeline from action_log, run root-cause analysis (platform / site / measurement / external), produce a structured postmortem document, distill reusable insights via /learn, and propose preventive guardrails. Use after a /rescue, a CPA spike, a conversion drop, or a runaway-spend event has been handled, or when the user asks for a postmortem, retrospective, root-cause writeup, or requests インシデント振り返り / ポストモーテム / 事後分析 / なぜ起きたのか / 再発防止策. Read-and-document only — makes no ad-platform writes.
18 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- nisarth/claude-skills-storetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- jaskirat1616/grok-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- github/awesome-copilottheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- pathiec92/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- fattain-naime/engineering-docstheir own version, first seen Oct 24, 2026
- JayRHa/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 15, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use systematic-debugging.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
OpenAISkillsystematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions18 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 18
- github/awesome-copilot★ 41ksame name
- proflead/codex-skills-library★ 153same name
- anthropics/claude-tag-plugins★ 60same name
- johnqtcg/awesome-skills★ 30same name
- jaskirat1616/grok-skills★ 22same name
- JayRHa/agent-skills★ 12same name
- JayRHa/AgentSkills★ 12same name
- z-Zihan/Evir★ 11same name
- fattain-naime/engineering-docs★ 6same name
- KhaledSaeed18/dotclaude★ 5same name
8 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository30 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- ad-fatigue-checkSkill
- audience-reviewSkill
- budget-pacingSkill
- budget-rebalanceSkill
- competitive-scanSkill
- creative-generateSkill
- creative-refreshSkill
- daily-checkSkill
- experimentSkill
- goal-reviewSkill
- lead-form-createSkill
- learnSkill
- monthly-reportSkill
- _mureo-amazon-adsSkill
- _mureo-google-adsSkill
- _mureo-learningSkill
- _mureo-meta-adsSkill
- _mureo-pro-diagnosisSkill
- _mureo-report-persistSkill
- _mureo-sharedSkill
- _mureo-state-schemaSkill
- _mureo-strategySkill
- onboardSkill
- rescueSkill
- search-term-cleanupSkill
- sync-stateSkill
- tracking-healthSkill
- weekly-reportSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 15 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 21
Before you start: Run the Diagnostic preamble from ../_mureo-shared/SKILL.md — load learning insights (mureo_learning_insights_get) and …
- Distinctive: line 37
Run a 5-whys chain until you reach a controllable cause (something the operator can change) or an honest unknown (say "root cause not …
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 15 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Incident Postmortem
PREREQUISITE: Read
../_mureo-shared/SKILL.mdfor auth, security rules, output format, and Tool Selection (Read/Write on Code,mureo_strategy_*/mureo_state_*MCP on Desktop / Cowork).
After the fire is out, learn from it. A rescue that is never reflected on repeats: the same root cause resurfaces, the same scramble happens, and nothing in the account got more resilient. This skill reconstructs what happened, finds the controllable cause, and converts the episode into durable know-how and guardrails.
This skill makes NO ad-platform writes — it changes no campaigns, ads, budgets, bids, or targeting. It only reads platform and state data, writes a postmortem document, appends the postmortem to action_log, saves insights via /learn, and — with explicit approval — edits STRATEGY.md ## Guardrails. Say this up front to the operator so they know nothing in the ad accounts moves during this review.
Prerequisites
- STRATEGY.md and STATE.json must exist (run the
onboardskill first)
Steps
Before you start: Run the Diagnostic preamble from ../_mureo-shared/SKILL.md — load learning insights (mureo_learning_insights_get) and consult advisors (mureo_consult_advisor) before drawing conclusions.
- Establish today: call
mureo_state_getfirst, on every host (including Claude Code, where you would otherwiseReadthe file) and takeserver_nowfrom its response — ISO 8601 with UTC offset, e.g.2026-07-28T10:12:33+09:00. Its date is the only source of the current date for this run: the scan window in step 1, the detection lag in step 2, and every "has this action'sobservation_duewindow closed?" judgement are measured from it. Do not shell out (this skill must run in Bash-less headless hosts). Theaction_logtimestamps andlast_synced_atyou reconstruct the timeline from are history — that is exactly what makes them useful here, and exactly why they are never "now". Never writeserver_nowinto STATE.json: it is a response field, and a persisted copy becomes tomorrow's stale "today". - Identify the incident: Take the operator's description if given. Otherwise scan the
action_log(viamureo_state_get) over the chosen window for the fingerprints of a handled incident: entries withcommand="/rescue", actions taken while Operation Mode wasTURNAROUND_RESCUE, or a cluster of stabilization actions (budget cuts, bulk pauses, bid drops) around a CPA-spike / CV-drop / runaway-spend date. Confirm the incident's scope (which platform(s), campaign(s), and date range) with the operator before reconstructing. - Reconstruct the timeline from
action_log(mureo_state_get) plus STRATEGY.md/STATE.json notes (mureo_strategy_get). Lay out, in order:- Detection — when and how the problem surfaced (a daily-check flag, an operator report, an anomaly). Note the detection lag — how long the account was off before anyone noticed; a long lag is itself a finding.
- Actions taken — each rescue action with its
metrics_at_actionbaseline and timestamp. - Outcomes — for each action whose
observation_duewindow has now closed (its date is on or beforeserver_now's date), callmureo_outcome_evaluate(evaluation_of= that entry's index,after= the campaign'smetricsobject frommureo_state_get, unchanged (includingperiodandfetched_at); passbeforeonly when the entry recorded nometrics_at_action(beside one it is refused:evaluation_of_conflicts_with_before)) for a deterministic improved / regressed / inconclusive verdict per action, read off one primary metric. For an action whose observation is still open (no laterevaluation_ofrecord), then append the evaluation record viamureo_state_action_log_append:evaluation_of= the same index,evaluation= theevaluationobject the tool returned, exactly as returned, andaction="Outcome evaluated"(a neutral label — the table carries the verdict, so do not restate it inaction; do not passsummary— mureo builds it from the table). For actions still inside their window, mark them still observing — do not score them (respect../_mureo-learning/SKILL.md).
- Root-cause analysis: Classify the cause into one (or a ranked combination) of four buckets, with the evidence for each:
- Platform-side — a budget/CBO change, a disapproval, and on the platforms that price delivery by auction (Google Ads, Meta) a bid-strategy misfire or an auction shift. Evidence: change history, the platform's own unit-cost trend (CPC / CPM where it reports one), delivery diagnostics.
- Site-side — a landing-page break, a checkout/lead-form failure, a speed regression. Evidence: CVR collapse with stable CTR, a deploy that lines up with the drop.
- Measurement-side — a pixel/tag break, a conversion-action misconfig, an attribution change. Evidence: conversions flatlining while sessions/clicks hold (cross-check
/tracking-health). - External — seasonality, a holiday, a demand shift, and on Google Ads / Meta a competitor entering the auction. Evidence: same-period-last-year, category-wide movement, and an impression-share change where the platform reports one. Run a 5-whys chain until you reach a controllable cause (something the operator can change) or an honest unknown (say "root cause not determinable from available data" rather than forcing a story). Do not stop at the first symptom.
What-worked / what-didn't table — grade the response, not just the incident:
Response action Intent Verdict Evidence Cut prospecting budget 40% Stop the bleed Worked Spend/day −38%, CPA back under target in 5d Paused top ad set Reduce waste Backfired Removed the only converting audience; CV fell Added negatives Cut junk queries Inconclusive Still observing (due in 6d) - Output a structured postmortem document with these sections: Summary (one paragraph), Impact (spend wasted / conversions lost / days affected), Timeline (step 2), Root cause (step 3, with the 5-whys), What worked / what didn't (step 4), Insights (step 6), Preventive guardrails (step 7). On Code, offer to
Writeit to./postmortems/YYYY-MM-DD-<slug>.md(create thepostmortems/directory if absent). On Desktop / Cowork, present it inline (no local filesystem). Keep it blameless and factual. - Distill 1–3 generalized insights and run
/learnfor each: Convert the root cause and the response grading into reusable, account-agnostic lessons (e.g. "A CVR collapse with stable CTR points site-side — check the LP/tracking before touching bids"). Present each for explicit approval, then save it through the/learnflow —mureo learn addper that skill's conventions (do not duplicate its steps here). One approval per insight; never record account IDs, credentials, or personal data. - Propose preventive guardrails where the root cause suggests one: if the incident was a runaway budget, propose a
## Guardrailsmax_total_daily_budget/max_daily_budget_increase_pct; if it was a measurement break, propose a recurring/tracking-healthcadence; if detection lag was the problem, propose a tighter/daily-checkrhythm. Editing STRATEGY.md## Guardrailsis a write — apply the approval gate: show the exact before/after of the## Guardrailssection and get explicit confirmation before saving (Write / Edit on Code,mureo_strategy_seton Desktop / Cowork). If the operator declines, leave STRATEGY.md untouched. - Log the postmortem itself to
action_logviamureo_state_action_log_append:command="/incident-postmortem", asummarynaming the incident and its root-cause classification, and ametrics_at_actionsnapshot of the post-incident state. This is a context-layer record (STATE.json), not an ad-platform mutation — it has noobservation_duebecause the postmortem itself is not an experiment to observe. It leaves a durable marker that this incident was reviewed, so it is not re-litigated later.
No mureo_state_report_set call: a postmortem is a one-off narrative document, not a recurring dashboard report — it is delivered as the document in step 5 and the action_log marker in step 8, not persisted to the reports section.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

