codex-engineering-skills
AGENTS.md0 starsChanged 13 days agoMITView on GitHub
This repository maintains reusable engineering instructions, not application frameworks. Choose the smallest sound change; preserve working skill behavior, scope, and installation compatibility. Set up the external validator and development dependency as described in CONTRIBUTING.md, then use: Use scripts/release_manifest.py for committed per-skill identity and exact collection ZIP verification. Explicit Git vMAJOR.MINOR.PATCH tags are the collection version authority; never rewrite published tags or regenerate the historical migration snapshot. Run full collection validation for cross-cutting changes and before publication. Package changed skills into…
Where files are headingNew AGENTS.md files have more rules about keeping secrets out of the code, and fewer about code style.
Of the AGENTS.md files we read, the 31,774 first seen in the last six months, against the older ones: the kind of rule that gained most share, and the kind that lost most. About files like this in general, not this one, and an estimate, since a kind is a pattern in the words.
In this repository17 other files it gives its agents.
- api-design-engineeringSkill
- deep-readonly-system-auditSkill
- distributed-systems-reliabilitySkill
- engineering-research-intelligenceSkill
- flutter-app-engineeringSkill
- go-backend-engineeringSkill
- multi-tenant-access-controlSkill
- nextjs-fullstack-engineeringSkill
- nodejs-backend-engineeringSkill
- postgresql-data-engineeringSkill
- react-vite-dashboard-engineeringSkill
- real-world-test-engineeringSkill
- redis-production-engineeringSkill
- repository-structure-engineeringSkill
- saas-security-engineeringSkill
- task-subagent-orchestrationSkill
- universal-database-engineeringSkill
The file
We split this AGENTS.md into the rules it gives an agent
9 rules. About 1 is common, 3 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.
≈1
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
5
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 8
Keep maintained developer tooling in Python.
- Very specific: line 16
Use the supported skill-creator workflow when available.
- Very specific: line 17
Use a valid lowercase hyphenated directory/name and precise description frontmatter.
- Distinctive: line 18
Keep the main workflow concise.
- Common: line 21
Add scripts/templates only for a demonstrated repeated need.
- Very specific: line 32
Use scripts/release_manifest.py for committed per-skill identity and exact collection ZIP verification.
- Distinctive: line 34
Run full collection validation for cross-cutting changes and before publication.
- Very specific: line 43
Never commit .tools/, .runs/, dist/, environments, caches, credentials, private application data, or conversation transcripts.
- Distinctive: line 45
Update the README catalog and contribution instructions when capabilities or commands change.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 40,246 AGENTS.md files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Maintaining Codex Engineering Skills
This repository maintains reusable engineering instructions, not application frameworks. Choose the smallest sound change; preserve working skill behavior, scope, and installation compatibility.
Ownership and structure
skills/<name>/is an independently installable package. KeepSKILL.md,agents/openai.yaml, references, required assets/scripts, andLICENSEinside it. No dependency on another skill's relative files.- Keep maintained developer tooling in Python. Consumer installation/update uses the existing Skills CLI with the version-specific safeguards in
docs/installing-and-updating.md; do not build a second installer. scripts/owns shared validation/packaging/release identity;tests/owns their regression tests. Reuse these tools before adding helpers.evals/holds optional evaluation utilities and deliberately defective synthetic fixtures. Do not fix those source fixtures to make checks pass. Evaluate changes in disposable copies.docs/source-manifest.jsonis the original migration snapshot, not a generated current-file inventory. Preserve its historical meaning.
Skill changes
- Inspect the relevant skill, its callers/references, and neighboring activation descriptions before planning. Do not load every skill for a localized change.
- Use the supported
skill-creatorworkflow when available. Follow the Agent Skills specification and the installed Codex host's metadata rules. - Use a valid lowercase hyphenated directory/name and precise
descriptionfrontmatter. State when to activate and where responsibility ends. Avoid overlaps with existing specialists. - Keep the main workflow concise. Use progressive disclosure for useful detail; link resources explicitly with portable relative paths and correct case. Avoid duplicated instructions or copied documentation libraries.
- Research consequential/version-sensitive claims using upstream documentation and relevant source/tests. Distinguish guarantees from recommendations, observations, and uncertainty. Record useful source links in the relevant reference.
- Preserve user/repository authority, read-only scope, existing sound architectures, and proportional verification. Do not make every simple task a research or planning exercise.
- Add scripts/templates only for a demonstrated repeated need. Document dependencies, safe invocation, cleanup, and meaningful checks. No personal paths, credentials, implicit global writes, or destructive defaults.
Verification and reporting
Set up the external validator and development dependency as described in CONTRIBUTING.md, then use:
python scripts/validate_skills.py <changed-skill>
python -m unittest discover -s tests -vUse scripts/release_manifest.py for committed per-skill identity and exact collection ZIP verification. Explicit Git vMAJOR.MINOR.PATCH tags are the collection version authority; never rewrite published tags or regenerate the historical migration snapshot.
Run full collection validation for cross-cutting changes and before publication. Package changed skills into a fresh ignored output directory when resource discovery or packaging changes. Test executable scripts using their native tools when applicable; Python AST validation alone does not prove execution correctness.
For meaningful changes, inspect realistic failure cases and add focused regressions where they improve evidence. Optional model evaluations require explicit execution and suitable isolation; do not run an expensive campaign for a documentation edit. State exactly what executed, failed, or remains unverified. Structural validation does not establish implicit activation, better agent decisions, or production readiness.
Announce substantial tasks before starting. For formal multi-task work, report findings, changes, tests/evidence, pending issues, and PASS/PARTIAL/FAIL/BLOCKED in chat at each completion. Keep coordination proportional and respect user-requested testing depth.
Public repository hygiene
- Review the complete diff, references, provenance, and licenses. Retain per-skill MIT notices; do not copy third-party implementation without checking its terms and suitability.
- Never commit
.tools/,.runs/,dist/, environments, caches, credentials, private application data, or conversation transcripts. Check new fixture data is synthetic. - Imported
skills/**andevals/fixtures/**retain their original bytes through Git attributes. Avoid mass line-ending or formatting changes. Review executable file modes for any new scripts. - Update the README catalog and contribution instructions when capabilities or commands change. Keep evidence dated and bounded; do not invent badges or evaluation results.
- Submit source changes through a feature branch and PR; do not bypass rules. Require CI contexts only after actual successful runs. Follow
SECURITY.md,docs/governance.md, anddocs/releases.mdfor repository security and publication. - Source maintenance does not authorize overwriting globally installed skills, changing repository visibility, or modifying unrelated projects.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

