agentleFS
llblabllblab/pi-actors/skills/artifacts/SKILL.md

artifacts

Skill19 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub

Use when an actor workflow must write reusable files, reports, manifests, or bundles with deterministic paths and declared outputs.

8 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use plan and handoff.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • BlockSkill

    plan

    Draft a TDD, PRD, or lightweight plan in the conversation without committing it.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • MicrosoftSkill

    handoff

    Compact the current conversation into a handoff document for another agent to pick up.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 8 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 0

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Use this Skill after the desired durable-output outcome is known.

    line 8
  2. Very specific:

    Keep input bounded and evidence-based.

    line 24

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 8 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Artifacts

Use this Skill after the desired durable-output outcome is known. For generic Recipe execution, Runs, persistence, or diagnosis, follow actors; this Skill only selects artifact behavior.

Choose the outcome

Desired outcomeRecipeResult
Write one generated artifact and a machine-readable manifest, with optional validation firstartifacts/bundlePrimary artifact plus manifest
Generate bounded normalized report content without committing a filesystem writeartifacts/reportReport content for review or later composition
Generate and write one artifactartifacts/writeDeclared artifact path written with explicit mode
Describe one existing or intended artifactartifacts/manifestManifest JSON on stdout; no write
Write prior pipeline output exactlyartifacts/file-writeSupporting stdin-to-file write; normally use inside composition

Prefer bundle when both durable content and inventory evidence are required. Prefer write for one accepted file. Use report while content still needs review. Do not use file-write as a content generator. If one selected outcome should become a recurring named tool, use the persistent-capability workflow in actors; do not copy its graph.

Inputs and boundaries

  • Keep input bounded and evidence-based; choose the current model explicitly where the Recipe requires model.
  • Supply caller-owned artifact_path and, for bundle, a distinct manifest_path.
  • write_mode=create is the safe default and stops if the target exists. Use overwrite or append only when the requested mutation is explicit.
  • Parent directories are created by the writer. ~ is resolved for artifact paths.
  • manifest reports existence, size, and modification evidence; it does not validate artifact meaning.
  • Validation in bundle runs only when run_validation=true and uses the caller-supplied trusted command and scope.

Stop rules

Stop rather than guessing when the target path, overwrite policy, accepted content, model, or validation command is unclear. Do not claim a durable artifact from report or manifest alone. After a Run starts, use the actors evidence and lifecycle protocol; this Skill does not redefine it.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.