Launch Artifacts Generator

Philosophy

Great documentation is useless if nobody finds it. This skill transforms existing PitchDocs-generated content (README, CHANGELOG, features) into platform-specific posts for launch and promotion.

Scope boundary: This skill generates content from existing code artifacts — it does not create generic marketing playbooks. Every artifact traces back to the README, CHANGELOG, or codebase features.

Prerequisites

Before generating launch artifacts, ensure the project has:

• A PitchDocs-generated README with hero section and features
• A CHANGELOG with the release being announced (if applicable)
• Feature extraction completed via the feature-benefits skill

Platform Templates

Dev.to Article

Transform README + CHANGELOG into a Dev.to blog post. Dev.to uses Liquid tags for frontmatter.

---
title: "[Project Name]: [Value proposition from README hero]"
published: false
description: "[README explanatory sentence, condensed to 100 chars]"
tags: [up to 4 relevant tags]
canonical_url: https://github.com/org/repo
---

[Opening hook — rewrite the README "Why" section as a narrative problem statement]

## The Problem

[Expand on the problem from the README's "Why" section — use reader-centric language]

## What [Project Name] Does

[Condense the README features into 3-5 key capabilities with code examples]

### [Feature 1]

[Brief explanation with code example from README quickstart]

\`\`\`typescript
// Copy the most compelling code example from the quickstart
\`\`\`

### [Feature 2]

[Another key feature with a practical example]

## Getting Started

\`\`\`bash
[Installation command from README]
\`\`\`

[Minimal usage example — keep it under 10 lines]

## What's Next

[Link to ROADMAP or upcoming features]

---

*[Project Name] is open source ([licence]) — [link to repo]. Contributions welcome!*

Dev.to tag selection:

• Use existing popular tags (check dev.to/tags)
• Maximum 4 tags per article
• Include language tag (typescript, python), category tag (opensource, devtools), and 1-2 topic tags

Hacker News "Show HN" Post

Title + description optimised for Hacker News submission.

Title format:

Show HN: [Project Name] – [One-line value proposition from README hero]

Rules:

• Maximum 80 characters for the title
• No exclamation marks, no ALL CAPS, no emoji
• Lead with what it does, not what it is
• Include the key differentiator

Description (first comment):

Hi HN,

I built [Project Name] to solve [problem from README "Why" section].

[2-3 sentences on the technical approach — what makes this different from alternatives. Include a concrete metric or benchmark if available.]

[1 sentence on the tech stack — language, framework, key dependencies.]

Key features:
- [Feature 1 — from README features, condensed]
- [Feature 2]
- [Feature 3]

[Link to repo] | [Link to docs/demo if available]

Happy to answer questions about [the most technically interesting aspect].

Timing guidance:

• Best days: Tuesday–Thursday
• Best times: 9:00–11:00 AM US Eastern (14:00–16:00 UTC)
• Avoid weekends, US holidays, and major tech conference days
• Source: academic study of 138 repo launches showed +121 stars within 24 hours of HN exposure

Reddit Post

Formatted for relevant subreddits. Each subreddit has different norms.

r/programming (technical audience, link post preferred):

Title: [Project Name]: [technical description, not marketing]
URL: https://github.com/org/repo

Add a first comment explaining the motivation:

Author here. I built this because [problem].

Technical highlights:
- [Technical detail 1]
- [Technical detail 2]

Built with [tech stack]. Feedback welcome, especially on [specific area].

r/webdev (web developer audience, self-post OK):

Title: I built [Project Name] to [solve problem] — open source
Body: [Condensed README with focus on practical usage and DX]

r/opensource (open source community):

Title: [Project Name] — [description] [language/framework]
Body: [Focus on contribution opportunities, roadmap, and community]

Reddit rules:

• Don't post to more than 2-3 subreddits for the same project
• Space posts across different subreddits by at least 24 hours
• Engage genuinely in comments — don't just post and leave
• Read each subreddit's rules before posting (some ban self-promotion)

Twitter/X Thread

Convert README features into a 5-tweet thread.

Tweet 1 (hook):
🚀 Introducing [Project Name]

[One-line value proposition from README hero]

Thread 👇

---

Tweet 2 (problem):
The problem: [Problem from README "Why" section]

[1-2 sentences expanding on the pain point]

---

Tweet 3 (features):
What it does:

• [Feature 1] — [benefit]
• [Feature 2] — [benefit]
• [Feature 3] — [benefit]

---

Tweet 4 (proof):
[Concrete metric, benchmark, or social proof]

[Code snippet or screenshot if applicable]

---

Tweet 5 (CTA):
Try it now:

[install command]

GitHub: [repo URL]
Docs: [docs URL]

Star ⭐ if you find it useful — it helps others discover it too.

Twitter/X rules:

• 280 characters per tweet
• Use line breaks for readability
• Include a code snippet image or screenshot in tweet 3 or 4
• Thread should be self-contained — each tweet makes sense alone

Awesome List Submission PR

Template for submitting the project to relevant awesome lists.

Step 1: Find relevant awesome lists

# Search GitHub for awesome lists in your category (GitHub CLI — for GitLab/Bitbucket, search manually)
gh search repos "awesome-[category]" --sort stars --limit 10

Step 2: Check contribution guidelines

Every awesome list has its own rules. Before submitting:

• Read the list's CONTRIBUTING.md or PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md
• Check the format of existing entries (description length, link style)
• Verify the project meets the list's quality criteria (stars, maintenance, docs)

Step 3: PR body template

## Add [Project Name]

**Description:** [One-line description matching the list's existing entry format]

**Link:** https://github.com/org/repo

**Why it belongs:** [1-2 sentences on why this project fits the list's criteria]

**Checklist:**
- [ ] Read the contribution guidelines
- [ ] Project is actively maintained
- [ ] Project has documentation
- [ ] Entry format matches existing entries

Awesome list entry format (adapt to match the specific list):

- [Project Name](https://github.com/org/repo) — One-line description matching the list's style.

GitHub Discussions Announcement

For projects using GitHub Discussions (GitHub-only feature — GitLab and Bitbucket do not have an equivalent), template for a release announcement.

Title: [Project Name] v[X.Y.Z] released — [headline feature]

## What's New

[Condense CHANGELOG entries into 3-5 user-facing highlights]

### [Highlight 1]

[1-2 sentences with a code example if applicable]

### [Highlight 2]

[1-2 sentences]

## Upgrade

\`\`\`bash
[upgrade command]
\`\`\`

[Link to migration guide if breaking changes]

## What's Next

[Link to ROADMAP or mention upcoming features]

---

Full changelog: [link to CHANGELOG.md or GitHub release]

Social Preview Image Guidance

GitHub uses the repository's social preview image when links are shared on Twitter/X, Slack, Discord, and LinkedIn.

Specifications:

• Size: 1280 x 640 pixels (2:1 ratio)
• File size: Under 1MB, ideally <300KB
• Format: PNG or JPEG
• Set via: Repository Settings > Social preview (manual upload)

Design recommendations:

• Project name in large, readable text (survives thumbnail cropping)
• One-line value proposition below the name
• Key visual element — logo, icon, or illustrative graphic
• Keep critical content centred (platforms crop differently)
• Use project brand colours for recognition

Tools for creation:

• Canva — Templates for GitHub social cards
• Figma — Custom designs with precise dimensions
• og-image generators — Programmatic generation

Anti-Patterns

• Don't spam multiple platforms simultaneously — space posts across 2-3 days
• Don't use identical content across platforms — adapt tone and format for each audience
• Don't make claims not backed by the README — every feature mentioned must trace to code evidence
• Don't post and disappear — engage with comments and questions on every platform
• Don't buy stars or upvotes — artificial engagement is detectable and erodes trust
• Don't submit to awesome lists before your docs are ready — list maintainers check quality