agentleFS
lithammerlithammer/ai/skills/create-pr/SKILL.md

create-pr

Skill0 starsChanged 52 days agoMITView on GitHub

Create a draft or ready-for-review PR for the current branch. Use when asked to draft, create, open, or prepare a PR, or to write a PR description.

  • Commits and pushes

196 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use update-pr, act-on-feedback and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • MicrosoftSkill

    update-pr

    Update the pull request for the current session. Use when the user wants to push new changes to an existing PR.

    Also in 9 projects that use this

  • MicrosoftSkill

    act-on-feedback

    Act on user feedback attached to the current session. Use when the user submits feedback on the session's changes via the Submit Feedback button.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • ModelEngine-GroupSkill

    create-release-note

    从 PR/commit 中自动生成结构化的 Release Notes,并可选创建 GitHub Draft Release。支持 x.y.0 版本合并前一 minor 系列的 release notes。当用户要求生成发布说明、创建 release notes 时触发。参数为版本号和可选的上一版本号。

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • frostneySkill

    native-nostalgia-stack

    Applies the user's FreePascal toolchain and its build, formatting, hook, and test contracts while leaving project-specific mechanics local. Use when scaffolding or working in a FreePascal project that follows this toolchain.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • frostneySkill

    software-engineering-excellence

    Applies the user's engineering standards during substantial technical work: preserve scope, use current evidence, delegate independent parts, and complete authorized outcomes. Use during substantial implementation, debugging, refactoring, or multi-part delivery work.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • parkchuSkill

    start-mission

    넥스트스텝(NextStep) 미션을 처음 시작할 때, 미션 저장소를 fork·clone하고 최초 작업 브랜치(step1 등)까지 만들어 준다. gh CLI로 fork하고 clone까지 이어서 처리하며, gh가 없거나 인증이 안 돼 있으면 브라우저 Fork 안내로 폴백한다. 이미 fork/clone돼 있으면 재사용하고 이어서 진행한다(재실행 안전). 사용자가 "미션 시작하려는데 저장소 세팅해줘", "새 미션 시작할래", "fork부터 해줘", "/nextstep:start-mission" 등으로 요청할 때 사용한다.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • +1 more from microsoft

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 179 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 5

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Write the title and description in the current session using the guidance below.

    line 12
  2. Distinctive:

    Read the description as a teammate about to review the diff.

    line 14
  3. Distinctive:

    If asked only for a description, return the title and body without changing Git state or creating a PR.

    line 17
  4. Distinctive:

    Create the PR as a draft unless explicitly requested ready for review.

    line 21
  5. Distinctive:

    Write from the PR author's perspective, not as an assistant reporting on their work.

    line 27

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 179 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Create PR

  1. Identify the current branch and an appropriate base branch. Inspect the intended changes, including uncommitted work, and use the conversation context already available. Check claims against the actual branch rather than relying on memory. Preserve file contents, unrelated changes, and unrelated staging.
  2. Write the title and description in the current session using the guidance below.
  3. Read the description as a teammate about to review the diff. Keep the outcome and useful heads-ups; cut implementation narration and explanations already present in the changed code or documents.
  4. If asked only for a description, return the title and body without changing Git state or creating a PR. Otherwise, prepare the PR branch locally, creating one if needed. Commit only the intended changes if needed, then push that branch. Keep the local checkout on the PR branch.
  5. Create the PR as a draft unless explicitly requested ready for review. Confirm the published body matches the intended text. Return the URL, or the title, body, and blocker if preparation or creation fails.

Description

Write from the PR author's perspective, not as an assistant reporting on their work.

Tell a teammate what this makes possible, then mention anything they'd otherwise be surprised by or need to decide. Assume they'll read the diff. Most PRs need only a short sentence describing the outcome.

A heads-up might explain why the change matters now, a surprising consequence, a deliberate omission, a decision for reviewers, or a merge dependency. These are reasons to add context, not a checklist to fill out. Keep discussion tied to a particular line in an inline comment rather than the description.

Answer what a reviewer, or someone tracing this change later, would ask first: how do you know it works? Show what you would show a teammate at your desk, beside the claim it backs, and let it replace the explanation where possible. Reuse it from the session or capture it now; gh pr create --help covers --attach. Tests and CI show that logic meets a contract, not that the change works in practice; leave out that they pass.

End the body with a line for each issue the PR references. Read its open acceptance criteria: write Closes #N when this PR meets the last of them, and Refs #N otherwise.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.