pseo-orchestrate
Skill54 starsChanged 15 days agoMITView on GitHub
Orchestrate the full programmatic SEO implementation by coordinating all pseo-* skills in the correct order. Use when implementing pSEO from scratch, running the full pSEO pipeline, or when the user asks to "set up programmatic SEO" or "build pSEO pages" without specifying a single skill.
1 other project uses a version of this, 1 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- karrolcia/hippocampusedited, first seen Mar 2, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 1
- karrolcia/hippocampus★ 1392% same
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository17 other files it gives its agents.
- gscSkill
- pseo-auditSkill
- pseo-dataSkill
- pseo-discoverySkill
- pseo-linkingSkill
- pseo-llm-visibilitySkill
- pseo-metadataSkill
- pseo-performanceSkill
- pseo-quality-guardSkill
- pseo-scaleSkill
- pseo-schemaSkill
- pseo-templatesSkill
- seo-content-refreshSkill
- seo-i18nSkill
- seo-log-analysisSkill
- seo-migrationSkill
- seo-regression-guardSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
36 rules. About 0 are common, 32 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈32
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 64
Run the complete pipeline: discover → audit → implement → validate.
- Distinctive: line 67
Run only pseo-discovery. No code changes.
- Distinctive: line 70
Run pseo-audit and pseo-quality-guard.
- Distinctive: line 76
Run only pseo-quality-guard against the existing implementation, plus seo-regression-guard against a local build.
- Very specific: line 81
Run pseo-discovery with scope all
- Distinctive: line 83
Ask the user to confirm which page types to pursue
- Distinctive: line 84
If data enrichment is needed, flag it - implementation cannot produce quality pages without sufficient data
- Very specific: line 87
Run pseo-audit with scope full, informed by the discovery output (what page types are planned)
- Distinctive: line 89
Ask the user to confirm which areas to implement
- Distinctive: line 90
Create a prioritized implementation plan based on audit results
- Distinctive: line 93
Run pseo-scale to set up database, sufficiency gating, CDN, and monitoring
- Distinctive: line 98
Run pseo-data to set up or refactor the data architecture.
- Distinctive: line 99
Verify data layer exports are complete and typed
- Distinctive: line 103
Run pseo-templates to create or refactor page templates and routing
- Distinctive: line 104
Run pseo-linking to build internal linking, breadcrumbs, and hub pages
- Distinctive: line 105
Verify all routes generate correctly: no sitemap URL returns 404.
- Distinctive: line 108
Run pseo-metadata to implement dynamic metadata on all templates
- Distinctive: line 109
Run pseo-schema to add JSON-LD structured data to all templates
- Distinctive: line 110
Verify metadata and schema render correctly on sample pages
- Distinctive: line 113
Run pseo-performance to optimize build times, CWV, and caching
- Distinctive: line 114
Run pseo-llm-visibility to optimize for AI citation (AI crawler access, optional llms.txt for non-Google agents, AI feature controls, …
- Distinctive: line 115
Run a build to verify it completes successfully at current scale
- Distinctive: line 116
Check bundle size and rendering performance
- Very specific: line 119
Run pseo-quality-guard with scope all (or delta at 10K+ pages)
- Very specific: line 127
Run gsc pull and inspect on a sample per template: indexed share, "Crawled - currently not indexed", canonical mismatches 30a.
- Distinctive: line 161
Never skip the discovery phase on a new project (unless user already knows exactly what pages to build)
- Distinctive: line 162
Never skip the audit phase on a new project (unless user explicitly says to)
- Distinctive: line 163
Always run pseo-quality-guard as the final step before launch.
- Distinctive: line 164
If quality guard finds critical issues, fix them before declaring success
- Distinctive: line 165
Commit changes at logical checkpoints (after each phase)
- Distinctive: line 166
Keep the user informed at each phase transition
- Distinctive: line 174
Does not choose a framework (assumes one is already in place or user will decide)
- Distinctive: line 175
Does not create content (assumes data/content exists or user will provide it)
- Distinctive: line 176
Does not deploy the site (gsc monitoring starts once it is deployed)
- Distinctive: line 177
Does not set up CI/CD
- Distinctive: line 178
Does not configure hosting or DNS
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
pSEO Orchestrator
Coordinate the execution of all pseo-* skills in the correct dependency order to implement or validate a complete programmatic SEO system.
Skill Dependency Graph
pseo-discovery (0) ← what should we build? what data exists?
│
▼
pseo-audit (1) ← is the codebase ready for what we want to build?
│
▼
pseo-scale (1.5) ← CONDITIONAL: only if 10K+ pages planned
│
▼
pseo-data (2)
│
├──────────────┐
▼ ▼
pseo-templates (3) pseo-linking (4)
│ │
└──────┬───────┘
│
┌──────┴───────┐
▼ ▼
pseo-metadata (5) pseo-schema (6) ← parallel: both read from data layer
│ │
└──────┬───────┘
│
┌──────┴───────┐
▼ ▼
pseo-performance pseo-llm-visibility ← parallel: independent optimizations
(7) (8)
│ │
└──────┬───────┘
▼
pseo-quality-guard (9)
│
▼
gsc (10) ← post-launch monitoring (after pages are live)Note: metadata and schema are independent of each other - both read from the data layer and render into templates. Run them in parallel in Phase 4.
Note: gsc is a post-launch step. It needs live pages and a submitted sitemap, so it runs after deployment and then on a recurring schedule, not inside the build.
Note: the general SEO skills sit beside this pipeline: seo-i18n runs with Phases 3-4 when the site is multilingual (alongside pseo-linking and pseo-metadata), seo-regression-guard runs before and after each deploy, seo-log-analysis and seo-content-refresh run after launch with gsc, and seo-migration is standalone (URL, domain or stack changes).
Note: pseo-scale only applies when discovery identifies 10K+ pages. It runs after audit to set up database infrastructure, data sufficiency gating, and CDN architecture before the data layer is built. At < 10K pages, skip it entirely.
Execution Modes
The $ARGUMENTS mode picks one of the modes below (default full).
full (default)
Run the complete pipeline: discover → audit → implement → validate. After deploy, hand off to gsc for post-launch monitoring (Phase 7).
discover-only
Run only pseo-discovery. No code changes. Use when the user doesn't yet know what to build.
audit-only
Run pseo-audit and pseo-quality-guard. No code changes. Assumes discovery is done.
implement
Skip discovery and audit, go straight to implementation (assumes both were already done).
validate
Run only pseo-quality-guard against the existing implementation, plus seo-regression-guard against a local build.
Full Pipeline Procedure
Phase 0: Discovery
- Run pseo-discovery with scope
all - Present the discovery report: data assets found, proposed page types, rejected candidates
- Ask the user to confirm which page types to pursue
- If data enrichment is needed, flag it - implementation cannot produce quality pages without sufficient data
Phase 1: Audit
- Run pseo-audit with scope
full, informed by the discovery output (what page types are planned) - Present findings to the user
- Ask the user to confirm which areas to implement
- Create a prioritized implementation plan based on audit results
Phase 1.5: Scale Infrastructure (conditional - 10K+ pages only)
- Run pseo-scale to set up database, sufficiency gating, CDN, and monitoring
- Migrate existing data to database if moving from file-based storage
- Compute data sufficiency scores and gate thin combinations
Phase 2: Data Foundation
- Run pseo-data to set up or refactor the data architecture. Data sufficiency comes first: define the minimum unique data per page type and generate no pages below it. Keep page HTML under Googlebot's 2MB limit (no huge inline JSON)
- Verify data layer exports are complete and typed
- Validate slug uniqueness and data integrity
Phase 3: Page Structure (parallel where possible)
- Run pseo-templates to create or refactor page templates and routing
- Run pseo-linking to build internal linking, breadcrumbs, and hub pages
- Verify all routes generate correctly: no sitemap URL returns 404; invalid slugs do return 404
Phase 4: SEO Tags
- Run pseo-metadata to implement dynamic metadata on all templates
- Run pseo-schema to add JSON-LD structured data to all templates
- Verify metadata and schema render correctly on sample pages
Phase 5: Optimization
- Run pseo-performance to optimize build times, CWV, and caching
- Run pseo-llm-visibility to optimize for AI citation (AI crawler access, optional llms.txt for non-Google agents, AI feature controls, entity consistency)
- Run a build to verify it completes successfully at current scale
- Check bundle size and rendering performance
Phase 6: Validation
- Run pseo-quality-guard with scope
all(ordeltaat 10K+ pages) - Present quality report to the user
- Fix any critical issues flagged by the quality guard
- Re-run quality guard to confirm all issues resolved 28a. Run seo-regression-guard to capture a baseline and check the build (canonicals, robots, sitemap, metadata) before deploying
Phase 7: Post-launch monitoring (after deploy)
- Deploy (outside this skill), submit the sitemap index, and launch in waves rather than all at once
- Run gsc
pullandinspecton a sample per template: indexed share, "Crawled - currently not indexed", canonical mismatches 30a. Run seo-regression-guard against the live site after each deploy 30b. Once data accumulates, run seo-log-analysis (crawl waste, time to first crawl) and seo-content-refresh (decay, pruning) on a monthly or quarterly schedule - Repeat weekly during rollout. If a template shows poor indexing, return to pseo-data (raise the sufficiency threshold) and pseo-quality-guard before publishing more pages
Decision Points
At each phase transition, check with the user:
- Phase 0→1: "Here are the pSEO opportunities. Which page types should we build?"
- Phase 1→1.5: "The audit found these issues. Scale target is N pages - do we need scale infrastructure?" (only if 10K+)
- Phase 1→2: "The audit found these issues. Proceed with implementation?" (if < 10K, skip 1.5)
- Phase 1.5→2: "Database and gating are set up. Proceed with data architecture?"
- Phase 3→4: "Templates and linking are set up. Ready for metadata and schema?"
- Phase 5→6: "Performance and LLM visibility optimizations applied. Ready for final validation?"
- Phase 6→7: "Quality guard passed. Deploy, then start gsc monitoring on a schedule?"
Progress Tracking
Track and report progress as:
Phase 0: Discovery [✓] Complete - 3 page types confirmed, 50K pages planned
Phase 1: Audit [✓] Complete
Phase 1.5: Scale Infra [✓] Complete (DB, gating, CDN) - skipped if < 10K
Phase 2: Data [✓] Complete
Phase 3: Structure [→] In Progress (templates done, linking in progress)
Phase 4: SEO Tags [ ] Pending
Phase 5: Optimization [ ] Pending (performance + LLM visibility)
Phase 6: Validation [ ] Pending
Phase 7: Monitoring (gsc) [ ] Pending (post-launch)Important Rules
- Never skip the discovery phase on a new project (unless user already knows exactly what pages to build)
- Never skip the audit phase on a new project (unless user explicitly says to)
- Always run pseo-quality-guard as the final step before launch; gsc monitoring follows after launch
- If quality guard finds critical issues, fix them before declaring success
- Commit changes at logical checkpoints (after each phase)
- Keep the user informed at each phase transition
Framework Note
All code examples across the pseo-* skills use Next.js App Router patterns by default. The concepts, data structures, and SEO principles are framework-agnostic and apply equally to Astro, Nuxt, Remix, SvelteKit, or any SSG/SSR framework. When working with a non-Next.js project, adapt the framework-specific APIs (routing, metadata, static generation) to the equivalent in the target framework.
What This Skill Does NOT Do
- Does not choose a framework (assumes one is already in place or user will decide)
- Does not create content (assumes data/content exists or user will provide it)
- Does not deploy the site (gsc monitoring starts once it is deployed)
- Does not set up CI/CD
- Does not configure hosting or DNS
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

