csharp-testing-standards
Skill6 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub
Defines the testing standards, patterns, and conventions for all C# unit and integration test projects. Rules cover test framework usage, naming, structure, mocking, assertions, and parameterization. Apply these rules uniformly across all test projects.
In this repository5 other files it gives its agents.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
12 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 9 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
9
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 40
Test classes are internal.
- Very specific: line 68
Keep [SetUp] focused – it should not contain assertions or complex logic.
- Very specific: line 112
All async test methods that are async Task must also follow the Async suffix rule:
- Distinctive: line 126
Every test body must follow the three-section AAA structure, with explicit comments:
- Very specific: line 154
Always use Assert.That(actual, constraint) – the NUnit constraint model.
- Very specific: line 172
Use Assert.ThrowsAsync<T> for async methods that are expected to throw:
- Very specific: line 181
Use .Verify() only when asserting that a side-effecting call was (or was not) made.
- Very specific: line 199
Use [TestCase] for boundary values (null, empty, whitespace, zero, negative) rather than duplicating test logic:
- Distinctive: line 238
Only mock types that your code directly depends on (interfaces, abstract classes in your own codebase).
- Very specific: line 242
Use the default loose mock behavior (MockBehavior.Default).
- Very specific: line 262
Never mock ILogger<T>. Use NullLogger<T>.Instance from Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions:
- Distinctive: line 308
Before submitting any test file, verify:
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
C# Testing Standards
Description
Defines the testing standards, patterns, and conventions for all C# unit and integration test projects. Rules cover test framework usage, naming, structure, mocking, assertions, and parameterization. Apply these rules uniformly across all test projects.
1. Framework & Tooling
- Test framework: NUnit 3
- Mocking: Moq
- Coverage: coverlet.collector
- Test runner:
Microsoft.NET.Test.Sdk+NUnit3TestAdapter
Core NUnit attributes in use:
| Attribute | Purpose |
[TestFixture] | Marks the test class |
[Test] | Marks a single test method |
[SetUp] | Runs before each test |
[TearDown] | Runs after each test |
[OneTimeSetUp] | Runs once before all tests in the fixture |
[TestCase] | Parameterized test inline values |
2. Test Class Structure
2.1 Visibility
Test classes are internal. They do not need to be public – NUnit discovers them via the test runner regardless.
[TestFixture]
internal class OrderServiceTests { }2.2 System Under Test Field
Name the field under test _sut (system under test) and initialize it in [SetUp]:
private OrderService _sut = null!;2.3 Mock Fields
Declare all mocks as class-level fields initialized in [SetUp]:
private Mock<IOrderRepository> _orderRepositoryMock = null!;
private Mock<ILogger<OrderService>> _loggerMock = null!;2.4 SetUp Method
- Initialize all mocks and the SUT in the
[SetUp]method. - Configure happy-path default behaviors here so individual tests only override what they specifically need.
- Keep
[SetUp]focused – it should not contain assertions or complex logic.
[SetUp]
public void Setup()
{
_orderRepositoryMock = new Mock<IOrderRepository>();
_orderRepositoryMock
.Setup(r => r.GetByIdAsync(It.IsAny<Guid>(), It.IsAny<CancellationToken>()))
.ReturnsAsync((Order?)null);
_sut = new OrderService(
_orderRepositoryMock.Object,
NullLogger<OrderService>.Instance);
}3. Test Method Naming
3.1 Pattern
MethodName_WhenCondition_ThenExpectedBehavior- MethodName – the method being tested (must match the implementation exactly).
- WhenCondition – the specific input state or pre-condition being exercised.
- ThenExpectedBehavior – the exact outcome that is asserted.
// ✅ Correct
public async Task GetByIdAsync_WhenOrderDoesNotExist_ThenReturnsNull()
public async Task CreateAsync_WhenRequestIsValid_ThenPersistsAndReturnsSuccess()
public void Validate_WhenAmountIsNegative_ThenReturnsInvalidResult()
// ❌ Wrong – vague and non-descriptive
public async Task TestGetOrder()
public async Task CreateOrder_Success()3.2 Async Test Methods
All async test methods that are async Task must also follow the Async suffix rule:
// ✅ Correct
public async Task CreateAsync_WhenRequestIsValid_ThenReturnsSuccess()
// ❌ Wrong
public async Task Create_WhenRequestIsValid_ThenReturnsSuccess()4. Arrange / Act / Assert
Every test body must follow the three-section AAA structure, with explicit comments:
[Test]
public async Task GetByIdAsync_WhenOrderExists_ThenReturnsOrder()
{
// Arrange
var orderId = Guid.NewGuid();
var order = new Order { Id = orderId, CustomerName = "Alice" };
_orderRepositoryMock
.Setup(r => r.GetByIdAsync(orderId, It.IsAny<CancellationToken>()))
.ReturnsAsync(order);
// Act
var result = await _sut.GetByIdAsync(orderId, It.IsAny<CancellationToken>());
// Assert
Assert.That(result, Is.Not.Null);
Assert.That(result!.CustomerName, Is.EqualTo("Alice"));
}5. Assertions
5.1 Constraint Model
Always use Assert.That(actual, constraint) – the NUnit constraint model. Avoid the classic assertion API:
// ✅ Correct – constraint model
Assert.That(result, Is.Not.Null);
Assert.That(result.IsValid, Is.True);
Assert.That(result.Message, Is.Null);
Assert.That(items, Has.Length.EqualTo(2));
Assert.That(items, Is.EquivalentTo(expected));
// ❌ Avoid – classic API
Assert.IsNotNull(result);
Assert.IsTrue(result.IsValid);
Assert.AreEqual(2, items.Length);5.2 Exception Assertions
Use Assert.ThrowsAsync<T> for async methods that are expected to throw:
Assert.ThrowsAsync<ArgumentNullException>(
() => _sut.CreateAsync(null!, It.IsAny<CancellationToken>()));5.3 Mock Verification
Use .Verify() only when asserting that a side-effecting call was (or was not) made. Do not use .Verify() as a substitute for return value assertions:
// ✅ Correct – asserting a save was triggered exactly once
_orderRepositoryMock.Verify(
r => r.SaveAsync(It.IsAny<Order>(), It.IsAny<CancellationToken>()),
Times.Once);
// ✅ Correct – asserting a call was never made
_orderRepositoryMock.Verify(
r => r.DeleteAsync(It.IsAny<Guid>(), It.IsAny<CancellationToken>()),
Times.Never);6. Parameterized Tests
Use [TestCase] for boundary values (null, empty, whitespace, zero, negative) rather than duplicating test logic:
[TestCase(null!)]
[TestCase("")]
[TestCase(" ")]
public async Task CreateAsync_WhenCustomerNameIsEmpty_ThenReturnsFailure(string customerName)
{
// Arrange
var request = new CreateOrderRequest { CustomerName = customerName };
// Act
var result = await _sut.CreateAsync(request, It.IsAny<CancellationToken>());
// Assert
Assert.That(result.IsValid, Is.False);
}For multiple varying inputs, prefer [TestCaseSource] over stacking many [TestCase] attributes:
private static IEnumerable<TestCaseData> InvalidAmounts()
{
yield return new TestCaseData(0m).SetName("Zero");
yield return new TestCaseData(-1m).SetName("Negative");
yield return new TestCaseData(decimal.MinValue).SetName("MinValue");
}
[TestCaseSource(nameof(InvalidAmounts))]
public void Validate_WhenAmountIsInvalid_ThenReturnsInvalidResult(decimal amount) { ... }7. Mocking Best Practices
7.1 Mock Only What You Control
Only mock types that your code directly depends on (interfaces, abstract classes in your own codebase). Never mock types owned by third-party libraries or the .NET runtime.
7.2 Loose vs Strict Mocks
Use the default loose mock behavior (MockBehavior.Default). Use MockBehavior.Strict only when you need to assert that no unexpected calls are made.
7.3 Use It.IsAny<T>() in SetUp
Configure broad default behaviours in [SetUp] using It.IsAny<T>(). Narrow down to exact arguments only in tests that specifically need it:
// SetUp – broad default
_repositoryMock
.Setup(r => r.GetByIdAsync(It.IsAny<Guid>(), It.IsAny<CancellationToken>()))
.ReturnsAsync((Order?)null);
// Individual test – specific input
_repositoryMock
.Setup(r => r.GetByIdAsync(specificId, It.IsAny<CancellationToken>()))
.ReturnsAsync(specificOrder);7.4 Use NullLogger<T> in Tests
Never mock ILogger<T>. Use NullLogger<T>.Instance from Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions:
_sut = new OrderService(_repositoryMock.Object, NullLogger<OrderService>.Instance);8. Test Organization
8.1 Test Project Naming
Each production project has a corresponding test project with .Tests appended to the name:
MyApp.Core → MyApp.Core.Tests
MyApp.DataAccess → MyApp.DataAccess.Tests8.2 Folder Mirroring
Mirror the folder structure of the production project inside the test project. Each production class has a corresponding <ClassName>Tests.cs file in the same relative folder.
8.3 Test Data Builders
Extract repeated object construction into dedicated builder classes or static factory methods to keep tests readable:
internal static class OrderBuilder
{
public static Order Build(Guid? id = null, string customerName = "Default Customer")
{
return new Order
{
Id = id ?? Guid.NewGuid(),
CustomerName = customerName,
TotalAmount = 100m,
};
}
}Quick Reference Checklist
Before submitting any test file, verify:
- Test class is
internalwith[TestFixture] - SUT is named
_sutand initialized in[SetUp] - All mocks declared as fields and initialized in
[SetUp] - Test method follows
MethodName_WhenCondition_ThenExpectedBehavior - Every test body has
// Arrange,// Act,// Assertsections - Assertions use
Assert.That(...)constraint model ILogger<T>is not mocked –NullLogger<T>.Instanceused instead[TestCase]used for boundary values, not duplicate test methods.Verify()used only for side-effect assertions, not return value checks
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

