question-refiner
Skill283 starsChanged 11 months agoNo licenceView on GitHub
将原始研究问题细化为结构化的深度研究任务。通过提问澄清需求，生成符合 OpenAI/Google Deep Research 标准的结构化提示词。当用户提出研究问题、需要帮助定义研究范围、或想要生成结构化研究提示词时使用此技能。
2 other projects use a version of this, 2 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- liangdabiao/claudesdk-stock-chatedited, first seen May 24, 2026
- cnfjlhj/ai-collab-playbookedited, first seen Mar 22, 2026
Other versions2 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 2
- cnfjlhj/ai-collab-playbook★ 45694% same
- liangdabiao/claudesdk-stock-chat★ 899% same
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository5 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- citation-validatorSkill
- got-controllerSkill
- research-executorSkill
- synthesizerSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
9 rules. About 0 are common, 9 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈9
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
No licence file, so all rights are reserved — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.