launch-readiness
Skill0 starsChanged 47 days agoMITView on GitHub
Audit a product before launch day. Checks the buy path end to end, the product page, the download, refunds, analytics and the announcement plan, and returns a go/no-go list with the fix for each blocker. Use when someone says "we launch tomorrow", "is this ready", or before announcing anything publicly.
13 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- harrison-ming/chuhai-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- paureis/pau-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Sach1ng/PM-operating-OStheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- omdenkar2-ui/all-in-onetheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- Hyde-and-Larkin/product-marketing-toolkittheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- vindreshsingh/engineering-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use experiment-designer and stakeholder-update.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
Dokkabei97Skillexperiment-designer
Designs A/B tests and product experiments with hypothesis structuring, sample size calculation, duration estimation, and result interpretation. Unified framework for both product and marketing experiments.
Also in 3 projects that use this
AnthropicSkillstakeholder-update
Generate a stakeholder update tailored to audience and cadence. Use when writing a weekly or monthly status for leadership, announcing a launch, escalating a risk or blocker, or translating the same progress into exec-brief, engineering-detail, or customer-facing versions.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions13 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 13
- pratikshadake/claude-product-management-skills★ 33same name
- RizwanZafaris/product-manager-OS★ 4same name
- Sach1ng/PM-operating-OS★ 3same name
- Hyde-and-Larkin/product-marketing-toolkit★ 2same name
- paureis/pau-skills★ 2same name
- AndyMelnykov/pm-loops★ 1same name
- harrison-ming/chuhai-skills★ 1same name
- ianklassen/ai-pm-system★ 1same name
- janellecipriano/pm-skills★ 1same name
- mikezamayias/agent-skills★ 1same name
3 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository2 other files it gives its agents.
- pricing-experimentSkill
- support-replySkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 10 edited versions we read keep these.
5
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 8
Before any public announcement of a product, price change or new version.
- Distinctive: line 25
Check trust signals are honest: No invented numbers, reviews or logos.
- Distinctive: line 30
If not, note the cheapest way to find out (checkout dashboard, server logs, UTM tags).
- Distinctive: line 53
Only mark something OK if you actually checked it.
- Distinctive: line 54
Prefer the smallest fix that removes a blocker today over a redesign.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 10 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Launch readiness audit
When to use
Before any public announcement of a product, price change or new version. Run it again the morning of the launch; things break overnight (expired links, unpublished drafts, wrong prices).
Inputs
- The product page URL or its source files, and the checkout/download URL.
- The price and any discount codes.
- Where the launch will be announced (list of channels).
- Optional: the refund policy, the receipt/thank-you email text, the analytics setup.
Steps
- Walk the buy path as a stranger. Landing page → buy button → checkout → receipt → download →
first-use instructions. Note every click. Every buy button on every page must point to the same live
checkout. Flag any
#, empty or draft links. - Check the offer matches everywhere. Price, discount code, what's included and the refund window must say the same thing on the page, the checkout, the listing and the announcement drafts.
- Open the deliverable. Unzip or open it. Does it contain what the page promises? Is there a README or "start here"? Does the first command in the instructions actually work?
- Check trust signals are honest. No invented numbers, reviews or logos. Claims are specific and checkable. There's a way to contact a human.
- Check the basics. HTTPS, mobile layout (375px wide), page title and meta description, a social preview image, a 404 page, spelling of the product name.
- Check you can measure it. Can you tell tomorrow how many people visited, clicked buy and bought? If not, note the cheapest way to find out (checkout dashboard, server logs, UTM tags).
- Check the announcement plan. Each channel's rules allow the post; drafts exist; someone will be around to reply for the first hours.
- Classify every finding as BLOCKER (launch would lose money or trust), FIX SOON or NICE.
Output format
VERDICT: GO | NO-GO (n blockers)
BLOCKERS
1. <what's wrong> → <exact fix> (where)
FIX SOON
...
NICE
...
VERIFIED OK
- <thing checked>: <how you checked it>Rules
- Only mark something OK if you actually checked it. "Looks fine" isn't a check.
- Prefer the smallest fix that removes a blocker today over a redesign.
Worked example
Input: "We launch the Tidy Desk Notion templates tomorrow on Gumroad, $12, code EARLY for $4 off. Page: tidydesk.example.com. Announcing on our newsletter and r/Notion."
Output:
VERDICT: NO-GO (2 blockers)
BLOCKERS
1. The hero "Buy now" button links to https://gumroad.com/l/tidy-desk-draft, which shows "This product
is not published". → Publish the Gumroad product, then replace the link on the page with
https://tidydesk.gumroad.com/l/desk (both buttons: hero and footer).
2. The page says "code EARLY: 50% off" but the Gumroad code is $4 off $12 (33%). → Change the page copy
to "$8 with code EARLY until 10 Oct", or change the code to 50%. The newsletter draft repeats the 50%
claim, so fix it there too.
FIX SOON
1. The zip contains 6 templates; the page says "7 templates". Either add the missing "Weekly review"
template or change the page to 6.
2. No meta description. Suggested: "Seven Notion templates for a calmer work week: planner, CRM,
reading list and more. $12, one-time."
3. r/Notion allows self-promotion only in the weekly thread; the draft is a standalone post. Move it to
the Thursday thread.
NICE
1. The social preview image is the default Gumroad one. A 1200×630 screenshot of the planner would do
better when shared.
VERIFIED OK
- HTTPS: page loads on https with a valid certificate.
- Mobile: checked at 375px, no horizontal scroll, buy button visible without scrolling.
- Receipt email: sent a $0 test purchase; the receipt links to the download.
- Refund policy: "14 days, no questions" appears on the page and in the Gumroad settings.Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

