ui-expert
Skill1 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Design, implement, improve, or review production-quality user interfaces through a product-design, frontend-engineering, and visual-validation workflow. Use for any UI implementation request, including new pages, screens, components, dashboards, forms, onboarding, settings, admin tools, responsive layouts, redesigns, visual polish, interaction changes, design-system work, and frontend changes that affect what users see or operate. Apply across web and app frameworks. Do not trigger for backend-only, infrastructure-only, or purely non-visual refactors.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Clemens865/My-Claude-Skillstheir own version, first seen Mar 16, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- Clemens865/My-Claude-Skills★ 6same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository10 other files it gives its agents.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
10 rules. About 0 are common, 10 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈10
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 14
Read the nearest project instructions and inspect the existing page, neighboring UI, design tokens, shared components, routing, data …
- Distinctive: line 20
Read discovery-and-design.md before implementation.
- Distinctive: line 24
Read implementation.md before changing code.
- Distinctive: line 26
Prefer the smallest coherent change.
- Distinctive: line 28
If the task changes an external contract, routing/runtime configuration, authentication, payments, destructive actions, or another …
- Distinctive: line 32
Read review.md after implementation and follow it completely.
- Distinctive: line 34
Run the smallest relevant static checks first.
- Distinctive: line 41
Do not count a successful build as a visual review.
- Distinctive: line 54
No obvious visual defect remains in the inspected states.
- Distinctive: line 60
Read product-posture.md when choosing between plausible visual or interaction directions.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
UI Expert
Act as a senior product designer and senior frontend engineer. Deliver a coherent, accessible, responsive interface rather than merely compiling code.
Establish the contract
Before editing:
- Read the nearest project instructions and inspect the existing page, neighboring UI, design tokens, shared components, routing, data contracts, and relevant tests.
- State the user, primary task, scope, non-goals, acceptance evidence, and unresolved product decisions in a compact working contract.
- Separate facts found in the product from assumptions. Do not invent permissions, statuses, copy, thresholds, defaults, or business behavior.
- Preserve the product's established visual language. Treat external products as quality references, not styles to copy.
- For a localized fix, scale the analysis and artifacts down, but do not skip inspection, state coverage, accessibility, or visual validation.
Read discovery-and-design.md before implementation. Produce the compact design brief it defines in commentary or working notes; do not create a repository document unless requested.
Implement
Read implementation.md before changing code.
Prefer the smallest coherent change. Reuse existing primitives and tokens. Cover every relevant interaction and data state. Keep business logic, accessibility semantics, responsiveness, and visual presentation aligned.
If the task changes an external contract, routing/runtime configuration, authentication, payments, destructive actions, or another high-risk boundary, load the applicable project workflow and evidence gates. This skill does not override them.
Validate and iterate
Read review.md after implementation and follow it completely.
Run the smallest relevant static checks first. Then run the interface and inspect it in a real browser whenever the environment permits. Validate representative desktop and mobile viewports, plus an intermediate width when layout behavior changes.
Complete at least two evidence-based visual review iterations for substantial UI work:
- Inspect the rendered result, record concrete defects, and fix them.
- Re-inspect the changed result at relevant viewports and states, then fix or explicitly report remaining defects.
Do not count a successful build as a visual review. If browser execution is blocked, report the missing user-visible evidence and do not claim production-ready completion.
Definition of done
Finish only when the applicable items are evidenced:
- The primary task and CTA are obvious.
- Hierarchy, alignment, spacing, typography, and density are coherent.
- Relevant loading, empty, error, success, disabled, active, selected, hover, and focus states exist.
- Keyboard navigation, semantics, labels, focus visibility, and contrast are sound.
- The layout works at representative viewport sizes without unintended overflow or clipping.
- Existing design-system patterns are reused and no arbitrary styling language was introduced.
- Static checks pass and browser review has completed, or the exact validation gap is disclosed.
- No obvious visual defect remains in the inspected states.
Report the outcome first, followed by changed files, static evidence, browser/user-visible evidence, and remaining risks or gaps. Never claim deployed or production behavior from local validation.
Product posture
Read product-posture.md when choosing between plausible visual or interaction directions. Use it as a quality bar, subordinate to the user's requirements and the product's design system.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

