agentleFS
letitbkletitbk/claude-academic-setup/skills/datacheck/SKILL.md

datacheck

Skill48 starsChanged 7 days agoMITView on GitHub

Use when starting work with a new data file or folder, before analysis or visualization, before reusing a derived file, after a merge, filter, reshape, or recode, when parsing fails, when a count or result looks wrong or comes back zero, or when the user asks what a dataset contains.

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

13 rules. About 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈8

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 5

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Check the path, size, and modified date.

    line 12
  2. Distinctive:

    Treat codebooks, documentation, coverage notes, API metadata, and earlier summaries as claims.

    line 15
  3. Very specific:

    Run file and head -c 500 <file> | cat -v.

    line 19
  4. Very specific:

    Read Stata and SPSS files with haven, so labels survive.

    line 21
  5. Very specific:

    Check how missing values are stored after reading: NA, NaN, empty string, "NULL", a text placeholder, or "True" and "False" as text.

    line 27
  6. Distinctive:

    Check what each column measures, not what its name says.

    line 29
  7. Distinctive:

    Never hard-code what a code means.

    line 30
  8. Distinctive:

    Check numeric ranges and impossible values, categorical levels, and date coverage.

    line 31
  9. Distinctive:

    Look for test, pilot, preview, and repeat respondent rows.

    line 33
  10. Distinctive:

    When files cover several years, waves, or versions, compare variable names and types across them.

    line 34
  11. Very specific:

    Before a join, check that the key is unique where it should be, count missing keys, and normalize keys the same way on both sides (case, …

    line 38
  12. Distinctive:

    After every merge, filter, reshape, or recode, compare row counts before and after, overall and by group.

    line 39
  13. Very specific:

    Treat a zero, an empty result, or a sudden drop as a bug until you have checked the literal codes (e.g., USA against US), the encoding, and …

    line 40

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Data check

Inspect before analyzing. Do not modify the source file. Report problems with suggested fixes, and do not apply a fix without approval.

1. Confirm you have the right source

  • Check the path, size, and modified date. A 0-byte file is often a cloud placeholder that has not downloaded. A partial scrape, an old committed copy, or a sample file can sit next to the full one.
  • For a folder, list every file before summarizing it. Look for all name prefixes and variants, corrupt pieces of partial downloads, and files inside archives. Identify a file type by its first bytes, not its name.
  • For a derived file, find the script and filter that produced it, and check that it is newer than its inputs. Recompute one aggregate from the source before you trust it.
  • Treat codebooks, documentation, coverage notes, API metadata, and earlier summaries as claims. Check them against the records.

2. Read the raw file

  • Run file and head -c 500 <file> | cat -v. Look for a byte order mark, \r line endings, the delimiter, extra header or footer rows, HTML entities, and literal \n text.
  • Count records with a real parser, not wc -l, because text fields can contain line breaks. Compare the count with the expected N from the source, manifest, or codebook. Report both numbers.
  • Read Stata and SPSS files with haven, so labels survive. Inspect Excel workbooks read only and list every sheet. Sample very large files by bytes before loading everything.

3. Profile what you loaded

  • Print the real column names and types. Never guess a column name. Names, spelling, and nesting differ between sources, batches, and API versions.
  • State what one row is, e.g., one person, one person per wave, or one posting per industry. Check that the identifier is unique at that level. Check the identifier's format for leading zeros lost, trailing spaces, .0, and long codes stored as decimal numbers.
  • Check how missing values are stored after reading: NA, NaN, empty string, "NULL", a text placeholder, or "True" and "False" as text. Keep blank, missing, and 0 apart. In Python, NaN counts as true, and groupby drops missing keys unless told not to.
  • Flag possible coded missings, e.g., 97, 98, 99, -9, or Stata .a to .z, when they sit outside the main range. Confirm their meaning from labels or a codebook. Never assume.
  • Check what each column measures, not what its name says. Confirm the unit, the event a date records (interview, submission, conferral, or listing), whose attribute it is, and the direction of a sign.
  • Never hard-code what a code means. Read the value labels, and check scale order and reverse coding before you average or recode.
  • Check numeric ranges and impossible values, categorical levels, and date coverage.
  • Find weights, strata, and clusters. Name the weight variable and count missing weights.
  • Look for test, pilot, preview, and repeat respondent rows.
  • When files cover several years, waves, or versions, compare variable names and types across them. A renamed variable can silently drop whole years.

4. Check again after you change the data

  • Before a join, check that the key is unique where it should be, count missing keys, and normalize keys the same way on both sides (case, spaces, punctuation, &, name suffixes, abbreviations such as D.C. and DC). Check for column names that collide.
  • After every merge, filter, reshape, or recode, compare row counts before and after, overall and by group. Report unmatched keys instead of dropping them. Join on keys. Never combine files by row position.
  • Treat a zero, an empty result, or a sudden drop as a bug until you have checked the literal codes (e.g., USA against US), the encoding, and the matching rule.
  • For every rate, state the numerator, the denominator, and the sample filter.
  • Report the number of rows a model actually used. Models and predict() drop incomplete rows.

Privacy

From participant level files, print counts and summaries, not values. Do not print identifiers, file names that contain identifiers, environment variables, or credentials. Do not open participant photos, audio, or free text unless the user asks.

Report

Return a short report:

  • the source, its version, and what one row is;
  • expected and observed counts;
  • problems found, each with suggested fix code that you have not run;
  • what needs confirmation from the user or the codebook;
  • the commands or log that produced the findings.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.