agentleFS
leiverkusleiverkus/research-superpowers/skills/grant-finder/SKILL.md

grant-finder

Skill4 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub

Use for researching German and European funding programs (DFG, ERC, VolkswagenStiftung, Gerda Henkel, Fritz Thyssen, bilateral DE-IL) for projects in theology, biblical archaeology, digital humanities. Produces a DFG-style research-status draft, funding ranking, panel recommendation, and BibTeX.

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

Files
SKILL.md

Grant Finder (Superpowers-Wrapper)

Wrap-skill around research-skills/dao-grant-finder. Use when the user signals funding planning, either in parallel to a current project or to spin off a follow-up.

Announce at start: "Using grant-finder to map funding landscape for <topic>."

When to use

  • User asks for "funding for X", "DFG proposal", "which foundation fits", "grant for Y" (DE / EN)
  • finishing-a-research-project → follow-up question: is there a next grant?
  • Planning phase before a long-running project (to align scope with funder expectations)

NOT for: single-grant lookup ("when's the next DFG deadline?" → web search), writing the actual proposal (that is drafting-manuscript with output target = grant-proposal).

Checklist

  1. Confirm research topic and current funding state with user
  2. Identify discipline buckets — Theology, Ancient Near Eastern Studies, Archaeology, Ancient History, DH — determines panel mapping
  3. Dispatch literature-scout in grant-mode (optional): identify recent funded projects in adjacent topics
  4. Load curated foundation database from research-skills/dao-grant-finder/foundations.yaml
  5. Match topic → funders using the database + DFG-Fachkollegien mapping (fachkollegien.yaml)
  6. Verify deadlines live — web-search current cycles for top-5 matches
  7. Produce grant-strategy document (11 sections per dao-grant-finder template)
  8. Produce grant-bibliography.bib — precedent-setting funded works and key methodological references
  9. Save outputs to output/grants/<YYYY-MM-DD-topic>/
  10. Summarize top-3 recommendations to user with live deadlines

Process Flow

digraph grants {
    "Confirm topic + funding state" [shape=box];
    "Discipline buckets" [shape=box];
    "Literature scout (optional)" [shape=box];
    "Load foundations DB" [shape=box];
    "Match topic to funders" [shape=box];
    "Verify deadlines live" [shape=box];
    "Produce strategy doc" [shape=box];
    "Produce grant BibTeX" [shape=box];
    "Save to output/grants/" [shape=box];
    "Top-3 summary to user" [shape=doublecircle];

    "Confirm topic + funding state" -> "Discipline buckets";
    "Discipline buckets" -> "Literature scout (optional)";
    "Literature scout (optional)" -> "Load foundations DB";
    "Load foundations DB" -> "Match topic to funders";
    "Match topic to funders" -> "Verify deadlines live";
    "Verify deadlines live" -> "Produce strategy doc";
    "Produce strategy doc" -> "Produce grant BibTeX";
    "Produce grant BibTeX" -> "Save to output/grants/";
    "Save to output/grants/" -> "Top-3 summary to user";
}

Reference Content

research-skills/dao-grant-finder/:

  • SKILL.md — full 11-section template
  • foundations.yaml — curated funder database (DFG, ERC, VolkswagenStiftung, Gerda Henkel, Fritz Thyssen, bilateral German–Israeli programmes, etc.)
  • fachkollegien.yaml — DFG panel mapping
  • data_sources.md — funder API documentation
  • templates/ — DFG Forschungsstand skeleton, cover letter templates

Output Structure

output/grants/<YYYY-MM-DD>-<slug>/
├── forschungsstand.md          # DFG-style 11-section document
├── funder-ranking.md           # top-10 funders with fit score + live deadlines
├── panel-recommendation.md     # DFG Fachkollegium recommendation with rationale
├── grant-bibliography.bib      # precedent funded works + methodological refs
└── README.md                   # summary + next steps

Red Flags

ThoughtReality
"DFG is always a fit"The Fachkollegium choice is what matters, not DFG itself.
"I know the deadlines by heart"Verify live — cycles change.
"Private foundations are second-tier"For humanities, VolkswagenStiftung / Henkel / Thyssen are often first choice.
"I'll just take the top match"Present top-3; the user picks with career context (career stage, institution).
"We don't need precedent works"Reviewers expect awareness of funded prior work in the segment.

Key Principles

  • Panel-match before funder-match — DFG Fachkollegium or ERC panel first
  • Live deadlines — static info is unreliable
  • Top-3, not top-1 — alternatives for career context
  • Precedent bibliography — shows familiarity with the funding landscape
  • Parallel to the running project — the grant story is fresh when the research is fresh

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.