agentleFS
learntocloudlearntocloud/learn-to-cloud-app/.github/skills/review-terraform/SKILL.md

review-terraform

Skill1.1k starsChanged 59 days agoMITView on GitHub

Run and review an Azure-backed Terraform plan for infrastructure changes. Use for "review terraform", "plan terraform PR", or Terraform deployability questions.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈3

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  • could be automatic: a setting could enforce it
  1. Distinctive:

    every planned action matches the intended diff

    line 14
  2. Distinctive:

    no unexpected destroy, replacement, identity, auth, networking, or data change

    line 15
  3. Distinctive:

    Do not recommend merge with unresolved destroy/replacement, identity, authentication, state-access, or authorization concerns.

    line 26

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Review Terraform

Review the diff and an Azure-backed plan before recommending merge. For an open infrastructure PR, follow the planning procedure. Inspect the existing head; do not update or rebase the branch unless requested.

Check:

  • every planned action matches the intended diff
  • no unexpected destroy, replacement, identity, auth, networking, or data change
  • resources Azure creates by default are updated/imported rather than recreated
  • the GitHub Actions identity has required Azure RBAC and, for azuread_*, Microsoft Graph permissions
  • provider and lock-file-only updates produce no infrastructure changes
  • Terraform formatting, validation, and tests pass

For risky identity changes, separate the platform gate from application deployment.

Report planned resource actions, unexplained changes, and any blocked checks. Do not recommend merge with unresolved destroy/replacement, identity, authentication, state-access, or authorization concerns.

Production applies must run through deploy.yml, which applies on merge to main before releasing the application. Review does not authorize apply, state mutation, imports, unlocks, or access changes. Never infer safety from terraform validate alone.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.