deploy
Skill150 starsChanged 5 days agoMITView on GitHub
Ship Taskuary: land a fix on master, then release it to PyPI with one command (tools/release.sh). Use when asked to deploy, release, ship, publish, push, "push to PyPI", cut a version, bump or tag. Encodes the fast loop the owner asked for on 2026-10-27 ("it's been literally all day to pass one fix .. we need a better system").
159 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- maxwell2732/claudecode-research-harness-workflowtheir own version, first seen Nov 15, 2026
- patrickjaja/claude-desktop-extratheir own version, first seen Nov 15, 2026
- nazmirket/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 15, 2026
- np25071984/kepttheir own version, first seen Nov 15, 2026
- davision0102/fabriktheir own version, first seen Nov 15, 2026
- notque/vexjoy-agenttheir own version, first seen Nov 10, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use pm-discovery, qa-phase and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
ww-w-aiSkillpm-discovery
PM Agent Team - Automated product discovery, strategy, and PRD generation. Runs PM analysis workflow to produce comprehensive PRD before PDCA Plan phase.
Also in 3 projects that use this
ww-w-aiSkillqa-phase
Run QA tests at various levels (L1-L5) for features under PDCA management. Integrates with MCP tools to execute structured test plans.
Also in 3 projects that use this
- +10 more from ww-w-ai
Other versions159 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 159
- ok-oldking/ok-wuthering-waves★ 8.6ksame name
- memovai/mimiclaw★ 5.8ksame name
- KingKongRobotics/jumper★ 3.1ksame name
- jhd3197/ServerKit★ 1.8ksame name
- pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow★ 1.7ksame name
- mattmireles/gemma-tuner-multimodal★ 1.5ksame name
- microsoft/power-platform-skills★ 1.2ksame name
- jazzyalex/agent-sessions★ 948same name
- awslabs/agent-plugins★ 943same name
- patrickjaja/claude-desktop-extra★ 761same name
149 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repositoryOne other file it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 141 edited versions we read keep these.
2
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 13
A fix reaches the owner: when it is on master - the owner's app runs from the main checkout (the owner's own working copy of the repo, not …
- Very specific: line 15
A release reaches PyPI: when tools/release.sh X.Y.Z.W finishes.
- Very specific: line 63
Then get master green: After the release is out, the full ci.yml on master's head must end green on GitHub.
- Distinctive: line 70
Run it in the background and report when it ends.
- Very specific: line 81
Request-count and timing tests: must count what they mean on a slow machine: wait for the state, never for a fixed sleep.
- Very specific: line 83
Merging branches by hand: never git checkout --ours <file> on a conflicted file - it drops the other side's clean hunks too (lost three …
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 141 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Shipping Taskuary
Two separate things, never mixed:
- A fix reaches the owner when it is on
master- the owner's app runs from the main checkout (the owner's own working copy of the repo, not a worktree), so a push + fast-forward + their restart is "shipped" for them. - A release reaches PyPI when
tools/release.sh X.Y.Z.Wfinishes. That is the only way to tag.
1. Land a fix (minutes, not hours)
- One fix, one branch, merged to
masteras soon as its own tests pass: the test files for what it touched, plusnpm exec --yes --package=node@22 -- node --test "test/*.test.mjs"(inwebsite/) whenwebsite/srcchanged. Never the full suites locally - CI runs them on parallel machines. Never batch ten branches and integrate at the end: every merge re-runs everything, and a day goes. website/srcchanged -> rebuild the committed UI before pushing (npm run build, plusbuild:demo;build:docswhendocs/site/*.mdor the tool catalog changed - CI's build-web job rejects a stalesite/docs).- Push, then fast-forward the owner's checkout:
git -C <main> merge --ff-only origin/master(only when it is clean). Tell them: restart Taskuary (Python changed) or refresh (UI only). - Red CI on master -> fix forward on master at once.
tools/ci-failures.sh <run-id|sha>names the failing tests. - Agents in parallel: few, on disjoint files, targeted tests only. Five agents each running full suites on one machine made every run slow and every timing test flaky.
2. Release (one command)
From a clean, up-to-date checkout of master:
tools/release.sh 0.3.9.54It bumps the seven version places (pyproject, both READMEs + their badge asof=, roadmap, docs manifest, the demo's three
fixture fields), builds UI/demo/docs, runs the fast gates (node unit, eslint no-undef, version/docs/catalog/timewords pytest),
commits, pushes, waits for ci.yml on that exact commit, tags only when green, waits for publish.yml (reruns once - the
exe's signing download flakes), verifies PyPI + the GitHub release with TaskuarySetup.exe, and fast-forwards the main checkout.
A clean release is ~20 min: build + gates ~3, CI ~12 (tests run in 3 parts per OS), publish ~7 (the signed exe is the long leg).
Red CI is not a restart (the owner, 2026-11-09: "20 minute release max .. rerun just that test, everything else that passed is good"). On a red run it prints the failed tests and stops - no whole-job rerun. Then:
- Decide per test: is the test wrong (timing, a stale expectation) or the code? Fix that, commit (no push needed).
tools/release.sh X.Y.Z.W --after <run-id> --fixed- pushes the fix, dispatchesci-targeted.ymlon the fix commit with exactly the failed tests plus the test module of every file the fix touched (Windows + macOS, ~4 min), and tags that commit when it is green - without waiting for the fullci.yml, which still runs on master.publish.yml's gate accepts a green targeted run on the tagged commit. A flake with nothing to fix: the same command with no new commit.- Red again -> it prints the targeted run's failures and the next
--after <that run> --fixedcommand.
--after <run-id> alone lists what would rerun; --dry-run also prints the exact dispatch without pushing anything. A docker
failure (or any job that is not tests/build-web/smoke) cannot be vouched for this way - fix it and use the full road.
Two duties, never traded against each other (the owner, 2026-11-10: "i want it released fully as long as tests pass and you just rerun the failure one. But then after release rerun ci since it's fixed and get it green.. don't hold up releases but make sure it's green. 2 things.."):
- Release at once. A red run is fixed and released on the targeted road above - never held for a full run, never restarted.
- Then get master green. After the release is out, the full
ci.ymlon master's head must end green on GitHub. The script's last step waits for it and saysmaster is GREENorGREEN IS STILL OWEDwith the failing tests. If it is owed: fix forward on master (test or code), push once,gh run rerun <run-id> --failed, and stay on it until the head is green. Land follow-up work in few pushes - a pile of small pushes leaves cancelled runs, which GitHub shows as not green.
The turn that ran a release is not finished until both are true: the version is on PyPI, and master's head is green.
Run it in the background and report when it ends; do not babysit runs by hand.
Its last step prints the Advisor agreement (lit button vs what the owner did, read-only on ~/.taskuary) - report it with the release; tools/advisor_agreement.py --replay breaks it down.
Rules that each cost hours on 2026-10-27
- Never cancel a run by looking it up by commit (
gh run list --commit X ... | cancel) right after a push: it cancelled the run that mattered. Cancel only by a run id you read for that exact sha - or don't cancel; let stale runs finish. - A browser job that runs past its time limit shows as CANCELLED, not failed. Keep each part well under its limit: CI runs
browser/shard.mjs <part> 6with 20 minutes each; a new browser test file goes inwebsite/package.jsontest:browser, and if a part creeps past ~14 minutes, add parts. - Request-count and timing tests must count what they mean on a slow machine: wait for the state, never for a fixed sleep;
CI's macOS gets 1.25x time budgets (
CI+ darwin), local stays strict. - Merging branches by hand: never
git checkout --ours <file>on a conflicted file - it drops the other side's clean hunks too (lost three overnight fixes once). Resolve the conflicted hunks only;website/package.json'stest:browseris the union. - Version numbers on PyPI can never be reused. The publish workflow gates on CI (
ci-green), so a red commit never uploads;tools/release.shrefuses a number already tagged. - Never commit the owner's data (CLAUDE.md). Commit messages and test names use the stand-ins.
- Release notes go in the tag message and the GitHub release; the README badge updates through its
asof=cache-buster.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

