agentleFS
lcsxulcsxu/zero-slop/skills/reality-skill/SKILL.md

reality-skill

Skill13 starsChanged 6 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Converts demo UIs into believable, end-to-end product workflows. Use when building, reviewing, or finishing apps, dashboards, CRUD flows, forms, onboarding, checkout, settings, auth-like surfaces, data tools, AI tools, integrations, or any UI that must behave like a real app instead of a static template. Composes after no-slop/perfect-design to make the interface operational, truthful, stateful, validated, persistent, and verifiable.

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

  • Other versions1 project uses a version of this.

    Word for word · 1

    1. Eid0lon/zero-slop★ 13100% same

    Edited · 0

    None found.

    Wrote their own version · 0

    None found.

    How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.

  • In this repository4 other files it gives its agents.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

9 rules. About 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈8

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use this skill aggressively whenever a request says app, tool, dashboard, portal, editor, workflow, CRUD, form, checkout, onboarding, …

    line 10
  2. Distinctive:

    Do not stop at a static UI when the user asked for an app, dashboard, tool, form, editor, portal, or workflow.

    line 64
  3. Very specific:

    Do not ship dead buttons, href="#", placeholder handlers, console-only submits, fake success toasts, decorative charts, fake metrics, fake …

    line 65
  4. Distinctive:

    Do not claim production capability unless the code actually connects to the production capability with real credentials/configuration …

    line 66
  5. Distinctive:

    Prefer real project services, schemas, stores, routes, and design-system primitives over invented abstractions.

    line 67
  6. Distinctive:

    When real backend/service access is absent, create an honest local boundary: local storage, in-memory state, fixture mode, disabled …

    line 68
  7. Distinctive:

    Every primary action must either work, navigate to a real next step, or be disabled with a specific reason.

    line 71
  8. Distinctive:

    Before editing, write or infer a compact contract:

    line 104
  9. Distinctive:

    If the contract is unclear, inspect the app and infer the most likely primary job.

    line 120

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Reality Skill

Reality Skill turns attractive screens into usable product workflows. It does not ask "does this look like an app?" It asks "can the intended user complete the job, recover from problems, and trust what the UI claims?"

Use this skill aggressively whenever a request says app, tool, dashboard, portal, editor, workflow, CRUD, form, checkout, onboarding, settings, upload, export, invite, generate, sync, connect, save, publish, deploy, analyze, or review.

Command Interface

Use references/command-interface.md.

Primary commands:

reality --audit [target]
reality --fix [target]
reality --build [brief-or-target]
reality --harden [target]
reality --judge [target]
reality --verify [target]
reality -e --audit [target]

Short flags:

  • -a, --audit: find dead actions, fake data, missing states, weak workflows.
  • -f, --fix: make the smallest workflow-real implementation.
  • -b, --build: build the real workflow model while creating a new app surface.
  • --harden: add durability, recovery, validation, accessibility, and edge-state coverage.
  • -j, --judge: score the app against the reality gates.
  • --verify: prove the primary workflow by tests, build checks, and browser checks when possible.
  • -e, --economy: skip live judge agents and use deterministic checks plus local review.

Default mode:

  • Existing UI target: --fix.
  • New app brief: --build.
  • Review-only request: --audit.

First Action

Load steps/step-00-command-router.md.

Step 00 parses the command, discovers project shape, loads only the needed references, and routes to audit, fix, build, harden, judge, or verify.

Core References

Load only what the task needs:

  • references/command-interface.md: grammar, mode precedence, output contracts.
  • references/reality-gates.md: the twelve gates that define "not demoware."
  • references/app-archetypes.md: workflow expectations for dashboards, CRUD, editors, checkout, AI tools, integrations, onboarding, settings, and auth-like surfaces.
  • references/implementation-playbook.md: concrete patterns for data models, actions, state machines, validation, persistence, optimistic updates, undo, and honest mocks.
  • references/truth-boundaries.md: how to represent sample data, unavailable services, auth, payments, exports, AI, analytics, and integrations without lying.
  • references/verification-playbook.md: build, test, browser, persistence, accessibility, responsive, and smoke-test proof.
  • references/judge-system.md: reality judge protocol and scoring gates.

Non-Negotiables

  • Do not stop at a static UI when the user asked for an app, dashboard, tool, form, editor, portal, or workflow.
  • Do not ship dead buttons, href="#", placeholder handlers, console-only submits, fake success toasts, decorative charts, fake metrics, fake users, fake payments, fake auth, fake AI, fake integrations, or fake exports.
  • Do not claim production capability unless the code actually connects to the production capability with real credentials/configuration already present in the project.
  • Prefer real project services, schemas, stores, routes, and design-system primitives over invented abstractions.
  • When real backend/service access is absent, create an honest local boundary: local storage, in-memory state, fixture mode, disabled integration, explicit sample data, or documented adapter seam in code and UI.
  • A primary workflow must include entry, intent, input, validation, submit/action, progress, success, failure, retry/recovery, persistence, and return/edit/delete paths where relevant.
  • User-created or edited data must survive the immediate workflow. Use server/database/API first, existing store second, local storage/URL state third, and clearly scoped memory only for throwaway prototypes.
  • Every primary action must either work, navigate to a real next step, or be disabled with a specific reason.
  • Forms must preserve user input after errors and show actionable inline messages near the relevant fields.
  • Data shown as real must be real or user-created. Sample data must be labeled as sample and must not pretend to be customers, revenue, uptime, compliance, security, or live analytics.
  • Verification is part of the implementation, not an afterthought. For frontend work, run the app when feasible and inspect the workflow in a browser.
  • Compose with no-slop and perfect-design when available: those skills improve design quality; Reality Skill makes the result operational and truthful.

Required State

Maintain this state throughout the workflow:

command:
target:
mode:
economy_mode:
project_type:
primary_user:
primary_job:
workflow_contract:
data_contract:
truth_boundaries:
reality_score_before:
blocking_gates:
files_changed:
implementation_strategy:
verification:
reality_score_after:
remaining_fake_boundaries:
ship_decision:

Reality Contract

Before editing, write or infer a compact contract:

User:
Job:
Starting point:
Completion condition:
Data needed:
Actions needed:
Persistence needed:
Unavailable real services:
Honest mock/local boundary:
States that must exist:
Verification path:

If the contract is unclear, inspect the app and infer the most likely primary job. Ask the user only when multiple high-impact jobs conflict and a wrong choice would waste the implementation.

Local CLI Helper

For deterministic prechecks:

python skills/reality-skill/scripts/reality_cli.py --audit <target>
python skills/reality-skill/scripts/reality_cli.py --json --audit <target>
python skills/reality-skill/scripts/reality_cli.py --strict --audit <target>

The CLI catches common demoware signals. It is not a replacement for reading code, implementing the workflow, browser verification, or the reality judge.

Done Means

  • The primary job can be completed end-to-end.
  • Primary actions are real or honestly unavailable.
  • User input is validated and preserved.
  • Relevant loading, empty, error, success, disabled, long-content, and small-screen states exist.
  • User-created data persists through the expected scope.
  • Navigation includes cancel, back, retry, return, edit, delete/recover paths where relevant.
  • Fake capabilities are implemented, disabled, or clearly labeled as local/sample/mock boundaries.
  • Verification ran, or the exact blocker is stated with the unverified risk.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.