agentleFS
lavine888lavine888/career-alpha/skills/position/SKILL.md

position

Skill0 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

Career Alpha 岗位定位与经历重组技能。用于根据目标岗位和真实证据,把项目、实习、比赛、开源贡献重组为可防守的岗位定位、简历要点、项目亮点、HR 开场白和 Founder / Hiring Manager outreach;当用户要求优化经历、做职业定位、写简历 bullet、联系招聘方,或判断“现在能把自己说到什么位置”时使用。

2 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

  • Other versions2 projects use a version of this.

    Word for word · 0

    None found.

    Edited · 0

    None found.

    Wrote their own version · 2

    1. menkesu/awesome-pm-skills★ 441same name
    2. soilmass/motion-design-agent★ 7same name

    How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.

  • In this repository9 other files it gives its agents.

The file

Files
SKILL.md

/position — Position the Evidence

/position 负责把真实经历翻译成招聘市场能快速理解的语言,但不替用户创造事实。

它吸收“经历酥化”最有价值的部分,同时多做一步:

现在能安全站在哪个位置?想再往前一档,还缺什么证据?


1. Inputs

优先读取:

  • 目标岗位 / JD;
  • 公司类型 / 行业 / 地域;
  • /proof Claim–Evidence Ledger;
  • 用户当前简历 / portfolio;
  • 已有项目 / PR /比赛 / 工作材料;
  • 用户希望使用的渠道:resume、HR、Founder、LinkedIn、portfolio、interview intro。

如果没有 /proof,可以先建立临时事实底稿,但对于强数字、ownership、奖项和 production claim,应建议回到 /proof 审计。


2. Build the positioning ladder

按 Positioning Ladder 同时给出:

Safe Position

  • 由当前证据直接支撑;
  • 五分钟追问不容易让招聘方觉得被误导;
  • 默认适合简历 headline / summary。

Strong Position

  • 更有差异化;
  • 仍可防守;
  • 必须说明边界;
  • 可以用于目标更激进的岗位 / Founder outreach。

Future Position

  • 当前还不能当成事实;
  • 明确要补的 evidence;
  • 用来指导 /build / /contributor。

Future Position 是 roadmap,不是当前 title。


3. Match the JD at capability level

不要只做关键词覆盖。

从 JD 提取:

  • core outcomes;
  • system responsibilities;
  • required evidence;
  • recurring tools / stack;
  • hidden seniority signals;
  • nice-to-have differentiators。

然后建立:

Target capabilityUser evidenceConfidenceRelevanceGap

优先写“高 relevance + 高 confidence”的事实。

不要为了 ATS 把所有 JD 关键词硬塞进简历。


4. Rewrite from work to value

默认结构:

Action → System / problem → Capability → Result / evidence → Ownership boundary

Raw

做了一个 Agent 页面,接了 API,也做了 memory。

Better

Built a tool-using agent workflow with explicit memory and recovery paths, then evaluated failure modes across a fixed task set.

前提是这些事实真实存在。


5. Strong verbs require ownership alignment

常见动词按强度理解:

Lower-risk

  • built;
  • implemented;
  • contributed;
  • analyzed;
  • integrated;
  • evaluated;
  • coordinated。

Higher-risk

  • led;
  • owned;
  • drove;
  • architected;
  • founded;
  • managed。

高强度动词必须与 /proof 的 ownership 一致。

如果用户实际承担的是产品收敛、集成和推进,也可以表达出 ownership,但应具体写清是什么决策和什么交付责任,而不是用一个模糊 title 替代事实。


6. Use numbers carefully

数字优先来自 /proof。

数字可以增强表达,但必须知道:

  • metric;
  • baseline;
  • sample;
  • measurement context;
  • 时间;
  • 是否可外部验证。

如果无法安全使用数字:

  • 用真实定性结果;
  • 用 artifact;
  • 用 scope;
  • 用 external validation;
  • 用 decision / tradeoff。

不要为了“量化”制造一个估算百分比。


7. Channel-specific translation

读取 Channel Templates。同一份 ledger 可以产出不同版本,但事实必须一致。

Resume

高密度、结果和 system capability 优先。

30-second intro

身份 → 反复解决的问题 → 一个 proof → 目标。

HR / Recruiter opener

短,不塞架构细节。

Hiring Manager / Founder DM

具体说对方的 problem + 自己已经做过的 relevant proof。

GitHub / Portfolio

Problem → Build → Measure → Failure → Reproduce。

Behavioral interview

事实一致,但强调 decision / constraint / learning。


8. Evidence-first “酥化”

Career Alpha 的“酥化”不是把小事写大,而是把底层动作翻译成更高层能力。

例如:

写接口、接模型、做异常兜底

可能对应:

AI workflow integration + failure handling + system delivery

但只有真的完成相关工作时才能这样归纳。

可以升级抽象层,不可以升级事实层

可以:

多个真实 docs / test PR → cross-project developer experience contribution

不可以:

一个 typo PR → led open-source developer experience strategy


9. Build a coherent narrative

简历不是经历仓库。

优先选择能形成一条连续 narrative 的经历:

I repeatedly work on X problem
→ in project A I learned Y
→ in contribution B I validated it externally
→ in project C I measured Z

如果某段经历很强但和目标岗位完全无关,可以缩短,而不是必须全部展示。


10. Evidence-gap analysis

这是 /position 和普通 resume rewrite 最大的区别。

输出:

Target capabilityCurrent evidenceGapConfidenceBest next action

Route gaps

  • 自建可快速证明 → /build;
  • 外部 collaboration 更值钱 → /contributor;
  • claim 本身存疑 → /proof;
  • 能写但讲不明白 → /interview。

不要只写“建议继续提升系统设计能力”。要给可形成证据的动作。


11. Default output

A. One-line Positioning

  • Safe
  • Strong
  • Future

B. Resume Summary

2–4 行,突出目标方向、最强 evidence 和差异化。

C. Experience / Project Rewrite

每段优先 2–4 条 bullet:

  • strongest action;
  • evidence;
  • result / scope;
  • ownership。

D. Channel Pack

默认给:

  • 超短 HR / Boss / 微信 opener;
  • 30 秒 intro;
  • Hiring Manager / Founder DM。

用户只要一种渠道时,不强制全部输出。

E. Claim Audit Notes

指出哪些 bullet 需要:

  • 保留;
  • 降级;
  • 删除数字;
  • 补证据。

F. Evidence Gap

明确下一步的最高 ROI 动作。


12. Dangerous patterns

主动避免:

  • AI-native / production-grade / enterprise 形容词堆叠;
  • title soup;
  • 技术栈罗列代替成果;
  • 把团队结果全部写成个人结果;
  • 把比赛 track 名次升级成总排名;
  • 把 prototype 写成 production;
  • 把 Future Position 写进当前 headline;
  • 为了显得 senior 增加无法解释的 architecture 词。

13. Handoff

交给 /interview 时保留:

safe_position:
strong_position:
future_position:
resume_claims:
  - text:
    confidence:
    evidence:
    ownership:
    interview_risks:
evidence_gaps:
recommended_next_skill: /interview

交给 /offer 时额外保留 target role / company assumptions,方便用真实回复率和面试反馈验证 positioning。

下游不能把 Future Position 当成已验证事实。

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.