handoff
Skill2 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
Make the current work resumable from a clean checkout — commit/push, record in-flight async work, flag what isn't durable. INVOKE ONLY when the user explicitly runs /handoff or asks for a handoff.
191 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- xiaoxiaosrm/dsh-mattpocock-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- ethosagent/ethostheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- dsifry/metaswarmtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- glebis/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- domengabrovsek/agent-configtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- domengabrovsek/claudetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use decision-mapping, setup-ts-deep-modules and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
FabienDehopreSkilldecision-mapping
Turn a loose idea into a sequenced map of investigation tickets, then drive them to resolution one at a time.
Also in 8 projects that use this
liufeng1976Skillsetup-ts-deep-modules
Wire dependency-cruiser into a TypeScript repo so each package is a deep module — implementation hidden in subfolders, reachable only through its entry-point files. User-invoked.
Also in 42 projects that use this
AWSSkillto-questionnaire
Turn a decision you can't fully answer into a questionnaire for someone else to fill in.
Also in 93 projects that use this
GoogleSkillask-matt
Ask which skill or flow fits your situation. A router over the skills in this repo.
Also in 87 projects that use this
RoentekSkillloop-me
Grill me about specs for the workflows I want to build, within this workspace.
Also in 51 projects that use this
LesaniSkillwriting-beats
Shape an article as a journey of beats, choose-your-own-adventure style. The user picks a starting beat from the raw material, you write only that beat, then offer options for where to pivot next, beat by beat, until the article reaches a natural end. Use when the user has raw material and wants to assemble it as a narrative rather than an argument.
Also in 54 projects that use this
Other versions191 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 191
- mattpocock/skills★ 309ksame name
- QuivrHQ/quivr★ 40ksame name
- The-Vibe-Company/quivr★ 40ksame name
- GreyDGL/PentestGPT★ 16ksame name
- ykdojo/claude-code-tips★ 10ksame name
- ArcReel/ArcReel★ 6.3ksame name
- vinvcn/mattpocock-skills-zh-CN★ 5.5ksame name
- withcoral/coral★ 4.9ksame name
- epicenter-md/epicenter★ 4.8ksame name
- EpicenterHQ/epicenter★ 4.8ksame name
181 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository12 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- remote/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- auditSkill
- decision-boardSkill
- deepthinkSkill
- doublecheckSkill
- filesSkill
- hpcSkill
- loadSkill
- planSkill
- taskSkill
- triageSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
7 rules. 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 172 edited versions we read keep these.
6
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 43
If substantive work remains, state the pickup point in an active durable doc (e.g.
- Distinctive: line 46
If the task is complete and only PR review, CI, or merge remains, do not create or edit repository documentation just to restate that …
- Distinctive: line 52
Do this last, so the docs you wrote in 1–4 land too.
- Distinctive: line 55
Follow repository Git instructions.
- Distinctive: line 58
Leave unrelated work untouched and unstaged.
- Very specific: line 60
Ensure every task-owned tracked change is committed.
- Distinctive: line 74
If substantive work remains, end with a fenced text block the user can paste verbatim as the next session's first message: the pickup …
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 172 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
/handoff — make the work resumable from a clean checkout
Goal: a fresh git clone plus a read of the project's durable docs is enough for the next session to
resume — except artifacts a project keeps local by design (gitignored checkpoints, pools, weights,
venvs; .gitignore is the source of truth). Nothing meant to be tracked may live only in this
conversation, the working tree, or a session-bound process. Close every gap you find — don't just report it.
1. Capture the session's substance (if any emerged)
Decisions and their rationale, findings/results, approaches tried and rejected, open questions — anything from the discussion worth keeping that isn't already in the code — into the project's durable docs (DEVLOG / TODO / notes, whatever the project uses). The conversation is not durable: a decision or finding that lives only in chat is lost. Skip if nothing substantive emerged or if it has already been recorded.
2. Record in-flight / async work
For running or pending work whose continuation depends on session-specific context — cluster jobs, background processes, scheduled tasks, or remote work not otherwise discoverable — record in an active durable doc its ID, the exact command/config, where outputs land, how to retrieve them, and its status, so a reader can resume it without this conversation.
An open PR is already durable and discoverable remote state. Do not copy its number, URL, transient status, or CI state into a plan, devlog, TODO, or completed/archive record merely because it is open; report those details in the final reply. Add repository documentation only when the project already maintains a PR tracker or when resumption requires non-obvious information that the PR and repository do not contain. Keep such information in an active work record, not a completed or archived one.
3. Surface what is NOT durable
- remote/scratch artifacts not yet collected; local-only artifacts the next session must regenerate or fetch (say how);
- session-bound watchers / background tasks that die with this session (the underlying job keeps running — say how to re-attach by ID);
- auth / secrets / local state that won't carry over.
4. State the pickup point
If substantive work remains, state the pickup point in an active durable doc (e.g. the top DEVLOG entry or a TODO file), not only your reply: where to resume, the next decision, and what unblocks it.
If the task is complete and only PR review, CI, or merge remains, do not create or edit repository documentation just to restate that transient state. Report it in the final reply. Never add handoff metadata solely for this purpose to a completed or archived plan, task, issue, or devlog.
5. Commit and push — the final gate
Do this last, so the docs you wrote in 1–4 land too. Commit and push everything from the handoff scope that is meant to be tracked:
- Follow repository Git instructions. Inspect the diff, distinguish task-owned changes from unrelated user or agent work, stage intended files explicitly, and verify the staged diff before committing.
- Leave unrelated work untouched and unstaged. It may keep the repository dirty; report it rather than treating repository-wide cleanliness as a handoff requirement.
- Ensure every task-owned tracked change is committed. Fetch and compare
HEADwith the branch's configured upstream, not a remote name such asorigin. Push the task commits so the upstream contains them. If the branch has no configured upstream, set it toorigin/<branch>when that matches the repository's existing convention (sibling branches pushed the same way, a single remote); ask only when the target is ambiguous — multiple remotes or a fork setup, no comparable branches, or a name that looks private/scratch. - Respect
.gitignore— don't commit the local-by-design artifacts above. If a file is a mid-edit, or you're unsure it should be tracked, surface it and confirm before committing.
Report
What's durable (committed/pushed), what's in flight (with the retrieve command), where you recorded the session's findings/decisions (if any), what isn't durable yet, and the one-line pickup point.
If substantive work remains, end with a fenced text block the user can paste verbatim as the next session's first message: the pickup point, the orientation files to read first (the active devlog or TODO, README, design notes — whatever a newcomer needs to orient), and any in-flight work to re-attach to. Skip files loaded automatically such as CLAUDE.md and the files it pulls in (e.g., AGENTS.md).
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

