OpenTester-Skills / rules
Cursor rule4 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub
OpenTester Testing Rules
We split this opentester.mdc into the rules it gives an agent
10 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 7 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
7
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 14
When the user mentions:
- Distinctive: line 19
Test files are modified
- Very specific: line 139
Call opentester.listProjects to show available projects
- Very specific: line 140
Call opentester.getProject(project_id) to show details
- Very specific: line 146
Call opentester.getProject(project_id) to find the case
- Very specific: line 149
Verify by calling opentester.getProject(project_id) again
- Very specific: line 156
Call opentester.getTemplate(template_id) to see variables
- Distinctive: line 157
Ask user for variable values
- Very specific: line 162
Ask user which values should become ${variable} placeholders
- Very specific: line 166
Use ${var_name} syntax in DSL templates
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 6,350 Cursor rule files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
---
description: OpenTester Testing Rules
globs:
- "**/*.test.yaml"
- "**/tests/**"
- "**/*_test.py"
alwaysApply: true
---
# OpenTester Testing Guidelines
## When to Use
When the user mentions:
- "/test" or "/t" - Create tests for code changes
- "run tests" - Execute existing tests
- "validate" - Check test syntax
- "delete project" or "delete test" - Remove test data
- Test files are modified
## DSL Validation Workflow (CRITICAL)
**ALWAYS validate DSL before saving!**
```
1. Generate DSL YAML
2. Call opentester.validateDSL(dsl_yaml) to check syntax
3. IF validation fails:
- Read the error message
- Fix the DSL (common: use assertion object instead of direct type/value)
- Call validateDSL again
- REPEAT until validation passes
4. IF validation passes:
- Call opentester.saveCase to store the test
5. Call opentester.runCase to execute
```
## DSL Format
### Basic Structure
```yaml
version: "1.0"
meta:
name: "Test Name"
description: "What this test verifies"
target:
type: cli # cli, api, or tui
timeout: 10
steps:
- name: "Step description"
action: exec|assert|wait
# action-specific fields
```
### Action: exec
```yaml
- name: "Execute command"
action: exec
command: "echo Hello" # CLI
# OR for API:
method: GET
path: "/endpoint"
```
### Action: assert (CRITICAL - USE assertion OBJECT!)
❌ WRONG - assert with direct type/value:
```yaml
- action: assert
type: stdout_contains # ❌ Wrong!
value: "text" # ❌ Wrong!
```
✅ CORRECT - assert with assertion object:
```yaml
- name: "Verify output"
action: assert
assertion: # ✅ Correct!
type: stdout_contains
expected: "text" # ✅ Use 'expected', not 'value'!
```
**CLI Assertions:**
```yaml
- action: assert
assertion:
type: exit_code|stdout_contains|stderr_contains|stdout_matches|stderr_empty
expected: value
```
**API Assertions:**
```yaml
- action: assert
assertion:
type: status_code|json_path
path: "$.data.name" # Required for json_path
expected: value
```
**TUI Assertions:**
```yaml
- action: assert
assertion:
type: screen_contains|cursor_at|screen_stable
expected: value
```
### Action: wait
```yaml
- name: "Wait"
action: wait
duration: 5
```
### Variables
- `${vars.name}` - Reference variable
- `${env.VAR}` - Environment variable
## Commands
| User Command | Response |
|-------------|----------|
| `/test [feature]` | Create and run tests |
| `/test-quick` | Quick test without PRD |
| `run tests` | Execute existing tests |
| `debug [test]` | Analyze failures |
| `delete project <id>` | Delete project and all its test cases |
| `delete test <id>` | Delete a specific test case |
| `list templates` | Show all DSL templates |
| `use template <id>` | Create test from a template |
| `save template` | Save test case as template |
## Delete Operations
### Delete Project Workflow
1. Call `opentester.listProjects` to show available projects
2. Call `opentester.getProject(project_id)` to show details
3. **CONFIRM** with user: "This will permanently delete the project and ALL its test cases"
4. Call `opentester.deleteProject(project_id)`
5. Report result
### Delete Test Case Workflow
1. Call `opentester.getProject(project_id)` to find the case
2. **CONFIRM** with user: Show case name and details
3. Call `opentester.deleteCase(project_id, case_id)`
4. Verify by calling `opentester.getProject(project_id)` again
5. Report result
### Template Workflows
**List and Use Template:**
1. Call `opentester.listTemplates(category?, target_type?, tag?)`
2. Call `opentester.getTemplate(template_id)` to see variables
3. Ask user for variable values
4. Call `opentester.instantiateTemplate(template_id, project_id, case_name, variables)`
**Create Template from Case:**
1. Call `opentester.getProject(project_id)` to find the case
2. Ask user which values should become `${variable}` placeholders
3. Call `opentester.createTemplateFromCase(project_id, case_id, template_name, variable_mappings)`
**Template Variables:**
- Use `${var_name}` syntax in DSL templates
- Variables are replaced when instantiating
- Common variables: `${base_url}`, `${endpoint}`, `${timeout}`, `${test_name}`
## Common Validation Errors
| Error | Fix |
|-------|-----|
| `Unknown assertion type` | Use `assertion: { type: ..., expected: ... }` instead of direct `type/value` |
| `field required` | Add missing required field |
| `YAML error` | Fix indentation |
Where files are headingNew Cursor rule files have more rules about planning and tracking tasks, and fewer about code style.
Of the Cursor rule files we read, the 3,978 first seen in the last six months, against the older ones: the kind of rule that gained most share, and the kind that lost most. About files like this in general, not this one, and an estimate, since a kind is a pattern in the words.
In this repositoryOne other file it gives its agents.
- opentesterSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

