cc-sdd-adr
CLAUDE.md0 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Kiro-style Spec-Driven Development on an agentic SDLC Steering (.kiro/steering/) - Guide AI with project-wide rules and context Specs (.kiro/specs/) - Formalize development process for individual features
In this repository17 other files it gives its agents.
- kiro-debugSkill
- kiro-discoverySkill
- kiro-implSkill
- kiro-reviewSkill
- kiro-spec-batchSkill
- kiro-spec-designSkill
- kiro-spec-initSkill
- kiro-spec-quickSkill
- kiro-spec-requirementsSkill
- kiro-spec-statusSkill
- kiro-spec-tasksSkill
- kiro-steering-customSkill
- kiro-steeringSkill
- kiro-validate-designSkill
- kiro-validate-gapSkill
- kiro-validate-implSkill
- kiro-verify-completionSkill
The file
We split this CLAUDE.md into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 17
Check .kiro/specs/ for active specifications
- Very specific: line 18
Use /kiro-spec-status [feature-name] to check progress
- Very specific: line 55
Keep steering current and verify alignment with /kiro-spec-status
- Distinctive: line 56
Follow the user's instructions precisely, and within that scope act autonomously: gather the necessary context and complete the requested …
- Very specific: line 60
Default files: product.md, tech.md, structure.md
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 26,980 CLAUDE.md files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Agentic SDLC and Spec-Driven Development
Kiro-style Spec-Driven Development on an agentic SDLC
Project Context
Paths
- Steering:
.kiro/steering/ - Specs:
.kiro/specs/
Steering vs Specification
Steering (.kiro/steering/) - Guide AI with project-wide rules and context
Specs (.kiro/specs/) - Formalize development process for individual features
Active Specifications
- Check
.kiro/specs/for active specifications - Use
/kiro-spec-status [feature-name]to check progress
Development Guidelines
- Think in English, generate responses in Japanese. All Markdown content written to project files (e.g., requirements.md, design.md, tasks.md, research.md, validation reports) MUST be written in the target language configured for this specification (see spec.json.language).
Minimal Workflow
- Phase 0 (optional):
/kiro-steering,/kiro-steering-custom - Discovery:
/kiro-discovery "idea"— determines action path, writes brief.md + roadmap.md for multi-spec projects - Phase 1 (Specification):
- Single spec:
/kiro-spec-quick {feature} [--auto]or step by step:/kiro-spec-init "description"/kiro-spec-requirements {feature}/kiro-validate-gap {feature}(optional: for existing codebase)/kiro-spec-design {feature} [-y]/kiro-validate-design {feature}(optional: design review)/kiro-spec-tasks {feature} [-y]
- Multi-spec:
/kiro-spec-batch— creates all specs from roadmap.md in parallel by dependency wave
- Single spec:
- Phase 2 (Implementation):
/kiro-impl {feature} [tasks]- Without task numbers: autonomous mode (subagent per task + independent review + final validation)
- With task numbers: manual mode (selected tasks in main context, still reviewer-gated before completion)
/kiro-validate-impl {feature}(standalone re-validation)
- Progress check:
/kiro-spec-status {feature}(use anytime)
Skills Structure
Skills are located in .claude/skills/kiro-*/SKILL.md
- Each skill is a directory with a
SKILL.mdfile - Skills run inline with access to conversation context
- Skills may delegate parallel research to subagents for efficiency
- Additional files (templates, examples) can be added to skill directories
kiro-review— task-local adversarial review protocol used by reviewer subagentskiro-debug— root-cause-first debug protocol used by debugger subagentskiro-verify-completion— fresh-evidence gate before success or completion claims- If there is even a 1% chance a skill applies to the current task, invoke it. Do not skip skills because the task seems simple.
Development Rules
- 3-phase approval workflow: Requirements → Design → Tasks → Implementation
- Human review required each phase; use
-yonly for intentional fast-track - Keep steering current and verify alignment with
/kiro-spec-status - Follow the user's instructions precisely, and within that scope act autonomously: gather the necessary context and complete the requested work end-to-end in this run, asking questions only when essential information is missing or the instructions are critically ambiguous.
Steering Configuration
- Load entire
.kiro/steering/as project memory - Default files:
product.md,tech.md,structure.md - Custom files are supported (managed via
/kiro-steering-custom)
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

