ttv-acceleration
Skill1 starsChanged 23 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
This skill should be used when the user says "[account] is stuck in onboarding", "[account] hasn't gone live", "time to value on [account]", "unblock [account]'s implementation", "onboarding is stalled at [account]", "why hasn't [account] reached first value", "TTV acceleration", or when a book review flags PB-ADP-01. It diagnoses the blocker for an onboarding account that has passed its segment's p75 time-to-value without a value milestone, assigns owners on both sides, sets a milestone target date, and drafts one approval-gated check-in.
In this repository9 other files it gives its agents.
- book-reviewSkill
- cs-setupSkill
- customer-360Skill
- ebr-generatorSkill
- expansion-whitespaceSkill
- feature-depth-auditSkill
- red-account-turnaroundSkill
- renewal-defenseSkill
- retention-reportSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 17
Follow ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/customer-360/references/playbook-protocol.md with these specifics.
- Distinctive: line 46
Do not propose a kickoff for an account that already had one.
- Distinctive: line 47
Do not assign an action to a customer contact who has been silent 45+ days without a re-engagement step first.
- Distinctive: line 48
Do not recommend paid services.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
TTV acceleration (PB-ADP-01)
Follow ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/customer-360/references/playbook-protocol.md with these specifics.
When it applies
lifecycle.stage == "onboarding", lifecycle.value_milestones_reached == [], and lifecycle.days_since_term_start > benchmarks.ttv_p75_days. If a milestone has been reached, say so and offer feature-depth-audit instead. If the account is simply early (under p50), say that too: the engine does not chase week-one accounts.
Inputs beyond the Customer 360
value_milestone_definitions_json: from~~product analyticsmilestone definitions when the connector exposes them, else the plugin defaultDEFAULT_VALUE_MILESTONESin${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/src/orchestrator.py. Tell the user which was used.- Onboarding history:
lifecycle.onboarding_steps[],lifecycle.kickoff_notes, sessions from~~calendar, onboarding-tagged tickets from~~support desk, andintegration/onboardingthemes from transcript signals. Pull these into the document before running if they are empty.
Prompt
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/prompts/adoption/ttv_acceleration.prompt. Classify the blocker from the taxonomy in the prompt; the blocker is the earliest unmet prerequisite of the nearest milestone unless evidence shows motion stopped for another reason.
Artifacts
PB-ADP-01.ttv_acceleration.action.jsonwith theonboarding_planblockPB-ADP-01.ttv_acceleration.comm_1.md: check-in to the customer-side owner (approval required)PB-ADP-01.unblock_plan.md: the plan as a one-pager: blocker, owners, three to five dated actions, milestone target date, first-win statement
Proposed writes
- ~~crm:
onboarding_risk_tier(watch / at_risk / stalled) on the account; a task to the implementation owner for each vendor-side action. - ~~support desk: when the blocker is
technical_integrationorvendor_delay, a ticket draft taggedonboarding-blockerwith the prerequisite named; created only on approval. - ~~calendar: a proposed configuration/training session on the date the plan names.
Rules specific to this playbook
- Do not propose a kickoff for an account that already had one.
- Do not assign an action to a customer contact who has been silent 45+ days without a re-engagement step first.
- Do not recommend paid services; you may note the blocker is of the kind professional services typically clears.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

