exit-strategy
Skill85 starsChanged 20 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use when implementation is complete and all tests pass — guides the clean exit from a development branch with structured options for merge, PR, or cleanup
- Commits and pushes
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- vivy-yi/xiaohongshu-skillstheir own version, first seen Jan 22, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- vivy-yi/xiaohongshu-skills★ 455same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository20 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- rules/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- audit-reviewSkill
- drill-tddSkill
- interrogation-debuggingSkill
- launderingSkill
- omertaSkill
- receiving-ordersSkill
- reconnaissanceSkill
- resource-developmentSkill
- safehouse-worktreesSkill
- sweep-verificationSkill
- the-capoSkill
- the-consigliereSkill
- the-grillingSkill
- the-hitSkill
- the-ledgerSkill
- the-sit-downSkill
- the-underbossSkill
- using-gangstaSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
11 rules. About 0 are common, 11 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈11
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 10
Every operation needs a clean exit.
- Distinctive: line 12
Core principle: Verify tests → Present options → Execute choice → Clean up.
- Distinctive: line 36
Stop. Don't proceed to Step 2.
- Distinctive: line 126
Wait for exact confirmation from the Don.
- Distinctive: line 140
Check if in a safehouse (worktree):
- Distinctive: line 150
For Option 3: Keep safehouse.
- Distinctive: line 165
Fix: Always verify tests before offering options
- Distinctive: line 172
Problem: Remove safehouse when it might still be needed (Option 2, 3)
- Distinctive: line 173
Fix: Only cleanup for Options 1 and 4
- Distinctive: line 184
Delete work without the Don's confirmation
- Distinctive: line 188
Verify tests before offering options
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
The Exit Strategy: Finishing a Development Branch
Overview
Every operation needs a clean exit. Guide completion of development work by verifying, presenting options, executing, and cleaning up.
Core principle: Verify tests → Present options → Execute choice → Clean up.
Announce at start: "Initiating exit strategy for this branch."
The Process
Step 1: Verify Tests
Before presenting options, verify tests pass:
# Run project's test suite
npm test / cargo test / pytest / go test ./...If tests fail:
Tests failing (<N> failures). Must fix before exiting:
[Show failures]
Cannot proceed with merge/PR until tests pass.Stop. Don't proceed to Step 2.
If tests pass: Continue to Step 2.
Step 2: Determine Base Branch
# Try common base branches
git merge-base HEAD main 2>/dev/null || git merge-base HEAD master 2>/dev/nullOr ask the Don: "This branch split from main — is that correct?"
Step 3: Present Options
Present exactly these 4 options:
Implementation complete. What's the exit strategy?
1. Merge back to <base-branch> locally
2. Push and create a Pull Request
3. Keep the branch as-is (I'll handle it later)
4. Discard this work
Which option?Don't add explanation — keep options concise.
Step 4: Execute Choice
Option 1: Merge Locally
# Switch to base branch
git checkout <base-branch>
# Pull latest
git pull
# Merge feature branch
git merge <feature-branch>
# Verify tests on merged result
<test command>
# If tests pass
git branch -d <feature-branch>Then: Cleanup safehouse (Step 5)
Option 2: Push and Create PR
# Push branch
git push -u origin <feature-branch>
# Create PR
gh pr create --title "<title>" --body "$(cat <<'EOF'
## Summary
<2-3 bullets of what changed>
## Test Plan
- [ ] <verification steps>
EOF
)"Then: Report PR URL to the Don. Preserve safehouse.
Option 3: Keep As-Is
Report: "Keeping branch <name>. Safehouse preserved at <path>."
Don't cleanup safehouse.
Option 4: Discard
Confirm first:
This will permanently delete:
- Branch <name>
- All commits: <commit-list>
- Safehouse at <path>
Type 'discard' to confirm.Wait for exact confirmation from the Don.
If confirmed:
git checkout <base-branch>
git branch -D <feature-branch>Then: Cleanup safehouse (Step 5)
Step 5: Safehouse Cleanup
For Options 1, 2, 4:
Check if in a safehouse (worktree):
git worktree list | grep $(git branch --show-current)If yes:
git worktree remove <worktree-path>For Option 3: Keep safehouse.
Quick Reference
| Option | Merge | Push | Keep Safehouse | Cleanup Branch |
| 1. Merge locally | ✓ | - | - | ✓ |
| 2. Create PR | - | ✓ | ✓ | - |
| 3. Keep as-is | - | - | ✓ | - |
| 4. Discard | - | - | - | ✓ (force) |
Common Mistakes
Skipping test verification
- Problem: Merge broken code, create failing PR
- Fix: Always verify tests before offering options
Open-ended questions
- Problem: "What should I do next?" → ambiguous
- Fix: Present exactly 4 structured options
Automatic safehouse cleanup
- Problem: Remove safehouse when it might still be needed (Option 2, 3)
- Fix: Only cleanup for Options 1 and 4
No confirmation for discard
- Problem: Accidentally delete work
- Fix: Require the Don to type "discard" to confirm
Red Flags
Never:
- Proceed with failing tests
- Merge without verifying tests on result
- Delete work without the Don's confirmation
- Force-push without explicit request
Always:
- Verify tests before offering options
- Present exactly 4 options
- Get typed confirmation for Option 4
- Clean up safehouse for Options 1 & 4 only
Integration
Called by:
- Laundering — After final verification
- Any skill completing branch-based work
Pairs with:
- gangsta:safehouse-worktrees — Cleans up the safehouse that skill created
Omerta Compliance
- Rule of Truth: Tests verified before offering options
- Rule of Availability: Final state reported to the Don
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

