agentleFS
kucherenkokucherenko/gangsta/skills/exit-strategy/SKILL.md

exit-strategy

Skill85 starsChanged 20 days agoMITView on GitHub

Use when implementation is complete and all tests pass — guides the clean exit from a development branch with structured options for merge, PR, or cleanup

  • Commits and pushes

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

11 rules. About 0 are common, 11 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈11

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Every operation needs a clean exit.

    line 10
  2. Distinctive:

    Core principle: Verify tests → Present options → Execute choice → Clean up.

    line 12
  3. Distinctive:

    Stop. Don't proceed to Step 2.

    line 36
  4. Distinctive:

    Wait for exact confirmation from the Don.

    line 126
  5. Distinctive:

    Check if in a safehouse (worktree):

    line 140
  6. Distinctive:

    For Option 3: Keep safehouse.

    line 150
  7. Distinctive:

    Fix: Always verify tests before offering options

    line 165
  8. Distinctive:

    Problem: Remove safehouse when it might still be needed (Option 2, 3)

    line 172
  9. Distinctive:

    Fix: Only cleanup for Options 1 and 4

    line 173
  10. Distinctive:

    Delete work without the Don's confirmation

    line 184
  11. Distinctive:

    Verify tests before offering options

    line 188

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

The Exit Strategy: Finishing a Development Branch

Overview

Every operation needs a clean exit. Guide completion of development work by verifying, presenting options, executing, and cleaning up.

Core principle: Verify tests → Present options → Execute choice → Clean up.

Announce at start: "Initiating exit strategy for this branch."

The Process

Step 1: Verify Tests

Before presenting options, verify tests pass:

# Run project's test suite
npm test / cargo test / pytest / go test ./...

If tests fail:

Tests failing (<N> failures). Must fix before exiting:

[Show failures]

Cannot proceed with merge/PR until tests pass.

Stop. Don't proceed to Step 2.

If tests pass: Continue to Step 2.

Step 2: Determine Base Branch

# Try common base branches
git merge-base HEAD main 2>/dev/null || git merge-base HEAD master 2>/dev/null

Or ask the Don: "This branch split from main — is that correct?"

Step 3: Present Options

Present exactly these 4 options:

Implementation complete. What's the exit strategy?

1. Merge back to <base-branch> locally
2. Push and create a Pull Request
3. Keep the branch as-is (I'll handle it later)
4. Discard this work

Which option?

Don't add explanation — keep options concise.

Step 4: Execute Choice

Option 1: Merge Locally

# Switch to base branch
git checkout <base-branch>

# Pull latest
git pull

# Merge feature branch
git merge <feature-branch>

# Verify tests on merged result
<test command>

# If tests pass
git branch -d <feature-branch>

Then: Cleanup safehouse (Step 5)

Option 2: Push and Create PR

# Push branch
git push -u origin <feature-branch>

# Create PR
gh pr create --title "<title>" --body "$(cat <<'EOF'
## Summary
<2-3 bullets of what changed>

## Test Plan
- [ ] <verification steps>
EOF
)"

Then: Report PR URL to the Don. Preserve safehouse.

Option 3: Keep As-Is

Report: "Keeping branch <name>. Safehouse preserved at <path>."

Don't cleanup safehouse.

Option 4: Discard

Confirm first:

This will permanently delete:
- Branch <name>
- All commits: <commit-list>
- Safehouse at <path>

Type 'discard' to confirm.

Wait for exact confirmation from the Don.

If confirmed:

git checkout <base-branch>
git branch -D <feature-branch>

Then: Cleanup safehouse (Step 5)

Step 5: Safehouse Cleanup

For Options 1, 2, 4:

Check if in a safehouse (worktree):

git worktree list | grep $(git branch --show-current)

If yes:

git worktree remove <worktree-path>

For Option 3: Keep safehouse.

Quick Reference

OptionMergePushKeep SafehouseCleanup Branch
1. Merge locally✓--✓
2. Create PR-✓✓-
3. Keep as-is--✓-
4. Discard---✓ (force)

Common Mistakes

Skipping test verification

  • Problem: Merge broken code, create failing PR
  • Fix: Always verify tests before offering options

Open-ended questions

  • Problem: "What should I do next?" → ambiguous
  • Fix: Present exactly 4 structured options

Automatic safehouse cleanup

  • Problem: Remove safehouse when it might still be needed (Option 2, 3)
  • Fix: Only cleanup for Options 1 and 4

No confirmation for discard

  • Problem: Accidentally delete work
  • Fix: Require the Don to type "discard" to confirm

Red Flags

Never:

  • Proceed with failing tests
  • Merge without verifying tests on result
  • Delete work without the Don's confirmation
  • Force-push without explicit request

Always:

  • Verify tests before offering options
  • Present exactly 4 options
  • Get typed confirmation for Option 4
  • Clean up safehouse for Options 1 & 4 only

Integration

Called by:

  • Laundering — After final verification
  • Any skill completing branch-based work

Pairs with:

  • gangsta:safehouse-worktrees — Cleans up the safehouse that skill created

Omerta Compliance

  • Rule of Truth: Tests verified before offering options
  • Rule of Availability: Final state reported to the Don

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.