unslop
Skill78 starsChanged 8 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Cut AI tells whenever producing or editing human-facing prose, including prose within coding tasks such as docs, comments, messages, and summaries. Do not rewrite code, identifiers, established domain terms, or required technical syntax.
197 other projects use a version of this, 144 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- alastairlundy/skillsedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- sanjaibalajee/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- ku5ic/claude-kittheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- augchan42/inkstoneedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- caidanw/skillsedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- runkids/my-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use principle-never-block-on-the-human, greploop-apps and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
jaydubya818Skillprinciple-never-block-on-the-human
Apply when safe reversible implementation details can proceed inside scope.
Also in 45 projects that use this
jaydubya818Skillgreploop-apps
Run greploop through @greptile-apps when the normal trigger rejects a large PR. Use only with the companion greploop skill.
Also in 5 projects that use this
ianclearySkillprinciple-explain-the-number
Apply before you trust, report, or act on a number you measured: a speedup, a regression, a throughput, a latency, or an eval result. Find what limits it, and rule out that it measured something other than the work you think.
Also in 30 projects that use this
bnemaSkillsetup-pstack
Configure which Pi models pstack uses per role. Detects available provider/model specs and writes pstack's user configuration. Use for /setup-pstack, "configure pstack models", or changing pstack model choices.
Also in 26 projects that use this
ianclearySkillpoteto-help
Guides users through pstack setup, /poteto-mode, and picking the skill, playbook, or principle for a task. Type /poteto-help with a question.
Also in 15 projects that use this
- +7 more from jaydubya818
Other versions197 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 144
- tester-army/e2e★ 13k86% same
- jaredpalmer/kev★ 9.8k71% same
- backnotprop/pstack★ 3.8k64% same
- michaelshimeles/rstack★ 1.4k84% same
- michaelshimeles/skills★ 1.4k84% same
- VladSez/easy-invoice-pdf★ 1.1k71% same
- moeru-ai/xsai★ 66764% same
- chinmay-sawant/gopdfsuit★ 60779% same
- open-telemetry/semantic-conventions-genai★ 52886% same
- pnpm/pnpm.io★ 31486% same
134 more not listed
Wrote their own version · 53
- heydamir/unslop★ 12ksame name
- Silo-Server/silo-server★ 899same name
- nodetool-ai/nodetool★ 615same name
- mshumer/unslop★ 551same name
- mxyhi/ok-skills★ 511same name
- theclaymethod/unslop★ 412same name
- savannahfeder/agentbox★ 376same name
- Sma1lboy/rove★ 184same name
- MohamedAbdallah-14/unslop★ 182same name
- asavvin-pixel/unslop★ 61same name
43 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository38 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- explorations/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- adhdSkill
- atom-reactivity-specialistSkill
- browser-qa-loopSkill
- closeoutSkill
- codex-findingsSkill
- crispenSkill
- effect-first-developmentSkill
- exploreSkill
- grillingSkill
- grill-meSkill
- grill-with-docsSkill
- jsdoc-annotation-specialistSkill
- motion-evidence-reviewSkill
- onepassword-secret-refsSkill
- ontology-architectSkill
- ontology-conceptualizerSkill
- ontology-curatorSkill
- ontology-foundational-auditorSkill
- ontology-mapperSkill
- ontology-requirementsSkill
- ontology-scoutSkill
- ontology-validatorSkill
- operator-handoffSkill
- orchestrateSkill
- plasma-sensitive-entrySkill
- portlessSkill
- qa-session-opsSkill
- quality-review-fix-loopSkill
- reflectSkill
- remote-development-agentsSkill
- schema-first-developmentSkill
- shadcnSkill
- sparql-expertSkill
- teachSkill
- turborepoSkill
- yeetSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. 4 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
4
Common
Most of the 193 edited versions we read keep these.
2
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 14
Add soul when the requested audience and tone permit it (see next section).
- Distinctive: line 21
Use this pass only when the requested audience and tone permit a personal voice.
- Common: line 54
Boldface overuse: Don't bold every proper noun or acronym.
- Common: line 56
Title case headings: Use sentence case.
- Common: line 57
Decorative emojis: Remove from headings and bullets.
- Common: line 79
Shorten or split dense sentences: If the reader has to backtrack to parse a sentence, break it in two or drop clauses.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 193 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Unslop
Edit text to remove AI patterns and add human voice.
Process
- Scan for the patterns below.
- Rewrite. Preserve meaning, match intended tone.
- Add soul when the requested audience and tone permit it (see next section).
- Self-audit: "What makes this obviously AI generated?" Fix remaining tells.
Adding soul
Removing patterns is half the job. Sterile, voiceless writing is just as obvious.
Use this pass only when the requested audience and tone permit a personal voice. For neutral, formal, legal, or controlled prose, preserve precision and do not add opinions or deliberate messiness that were not in the source.
- Have opinions. React to facts instead of neutrally listing pros and cons.
- Vary rhythm. Short sentences. Then longer ones that take their time. Mix it up.
- Acknowledge complexity. "Impressive but also kind of unsettling" beats "impressive."
- Use "I" when it fits. First person isn't unprofessional.
- Let some mess in. Perfect structure looks machine-made.
- Be specific. Not "this is concerning" but "there's something unsettling about agents churning away at 3am."
Patterns to detect and fix
Content
- Puffery. "pivotal moment", "testament to", "evolving landscape", "setting the stage for", "indelible mark", "deeply rooted". Cut puffery, state what happened.
- Name-dropping. Listing media outlets without context. Pick one, say what was said.
- Superficial -ing phrases. "highlighting...", "ensuring...", "reflecting...", "showcasing...", "fostering...". Delete or expand with real sources.
- Promotional language. "nestled", "vibrant", "breathtaking", "groundbreaking", "renowned", "stunning", "must-visit". Use neutral descriptions.
- Vague attributions. "Experts believe", "Industry reports suggest", "Some critics argue". Name the source or delete.
- Formulaic challenges. "Despite challenges... continues to thrive." Replace with specific facts.
Language
- AI vocabulary. Additionally, crucial, delve, enduring, enhance, fostering, garner, interplay, intricate, landscape (abstract), pivotal, showcase, tapestry (abstract), testament, underscore, vibrant. Replace with plain words.
- Fancy ways to say "is". "serves as", "stands as", "boasts", "features". Just say "is" or "has".
- "Not just X, but Y." State the point directly instead.
- Rule of three. Forcing ideas into groups of three. Use the natural number.
- Synonym cycling. Protagonist, main character, central figure, hero all in one paragraph. Pick one, repeat it.
- False ranges. "from X to Y" where X and Y aren't on a meaningful scale. List topics directly.
Style
- Em dash overuse. Avoid em dashes entirely. Use periods or commas instead, and do not use parentheses, en dashes, or hyphens merely as dash substitutes. Keep parentheses when they carry required syntax, citations, or technical grouping. If a thought needs separation, end the sentence or use a comma.
- Colon overuse. Colons are fine before a list or example. Not as mid-sentence connectors. "If you're coming from traditional automation: instead of registering event handlers, you describe conditions" adds nothing with the colon. Rewrite to let the point stand on its own without comparison framing. "Describing when the scheduler should fire works best as plain English." Same meaning, no crutch punctuation.
- Boldface overuse. Don't bold every proper noun or acronym.
- Inline-header lists. The tell is a bold label and colon that restates the line: "Performance: Performance improved...". Convert those to prose. A bold lead-in that ends in a period, names the item, and is followed by genuinely new detail ("Schema in TypeScript. Tables live in one file.") is fine, not a tell.
- Title case headings. Use sentence case.
- Decorative emojis. Remove from headings and bullets.
- Curly quotes. Replace with straight quotes.
Communication artifacts
- Chatbot phrases. "I hope this helps!", "Let me know if...", "Of course!", "Certainly!", "Found the smoking gun!" Remove.
- Cutoff disclaimers. "While specific details are limited..." Find sources or remove.
- Sycophantic tone. "Great question! You're absolutely right!" Respond directly.
Filler
- Filler phrases. "In order to" becomes "To". "Due to the fact that" becomes "Because". "It is important to note that" gets deleted.
- Excessive hedging. "could potentially possibly be argued that it might" becomes "may".
- Generic conclusions. "The future looks bright." State specific plans or facts.
Jargon
- Abstract metaphor nouns. Substrate, wedge, vector, locus, vantage, nexus, primitive (as noun), harness (as metaphor), surface, bedrock, scaffolding (as metaphor), modality, paradigm, gold-plating, ratchet (as metaphor), evacuate (for moving code), endgame, north star, flywheel. Replace these when they are vague metaphors, not when they are established project vocabulary. Never rewrite code, identifiers, or domain terms such as "API surface" or a named quality ratchet. When a plainer word is accurate, "substrate" becomes "base", "wedge in" becomes "add", and "vector" becomes "way" or "method". Pick the concrete word.
Plain speech
- Say what it does, not how it feels. "the database stays close at hand", "SQL you can read", "types that follow your schema" name a feeling. The fix names the mechanism or a number: "
.toSQL()returns the exact string sent to the database", "a column rename fails the build". Ask what the sentence tells the reader to do or know, then write that. If you can't restate it as a concrete instruction, fact, or number, cut it. For generic promotional filler, ask whether the sentence conveys a project-specific fact or essential reusable guidance. Cut it only when the answer is no. Preserve prerequisites, safety and security warnings, compatibility notes, accessibility instructions, standards, and other necessary guidance even when it applies to more than one project. - Shorten or split dense sentences. If the reader has to backtrack to parse a sentence, break it in two or drop clauses. One idea per sentence.
- Active voice. Prefer it. Catch "is/are/was/were + past participle" and name the actor: "queries are validated" becomes "the compiler validates queries", "the file is parsed by the loader" becomes "the loader parses the file". Passive is fine only when the actor is unknown or genuinely doesn't matter.
- Cut adverbs, or use a stronger verb. "runs quickly" becomes "is fast" or the number. "significantly improves" becomes the measured delta. An adverb propping up a weak verb means the verb is wrong.
- Prefer the plain word. "utilize" becomes "use", "leverage" becomes "use", "facilitate" becomes "help", "numerous" becomes "many", "in the event that" becomes "if". The fancier synonym is rarely clearer.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

