planning-methodology
Skill16 starsChanged 5 days agoMITView on GitHub
Build minimal, reversible implementation plans. TRIGGER when: turning research into a plan, or sequencing work before writing code. SKIP: gathering documentation (use research-methodology); writing OpenSpec design.md/tasks.md (use spec-design); should this exist at all (use necessity-first).
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- VAMFI/claude-user-memorytheir own version, first seen Nov 23, 2025
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- VAMFI/claude-user-memory★ 206same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository39 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- agent-commsSkill
- agent-memorySkill
- api-designSkill
- context-engineeringSkill
- database-optimizationSkill
- distillSkill
- docker-templatesSkill
- error-handlingSkill
- frontend-designSkill
- github-actions-templateSkill
- git-operationsSkill
- logging-standardsSkill
- mcp-toolsSkill
- monitoring-observabilitySkill
- mui-stylingSkill
- necessity-firstSkill
- pattern-recognitionSkill
- python-patternsSkill
- quality-validationSkill
- react-patternsSkill
- research-methodologySkill
- reverse-engineer-anythingSkill
- security-review-checklistsSkill
- semantic-memory-mcpSkill
- skill-authoringSkill
- sofa-searchSkill
- spec-designSkill
- spec-developSkill
- spec-researchSkill
- spec-reviewSkill
- spec-workflowSkill
- state-managementSkill
- systematic-debuggingSkill
- testing-strategySkill
- ui-ux-pro-maxSkill
- verification-before-completionSkill
- watch-patternsSkill
- worktree-managementSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
9 rules. About 0 are common, 9 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈9
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 12
After ResearchPack is validated (score >= 80)
- Distinctive: line 13
Before code implementation begins
- Distinctive: line 14
When task requires multi-file changes
- Distinctive: line 28
Check for similar implementations
- Distinctive: line 81
Only modify what's necessary
- Distinctive: line 83
Prefer small, focused changes
- Distinctive: line 86
Every change must be revertable
- Distinctive: line 87
Document rollback per step
- Distinctive: line 88
Keep backup strategy clear
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Planning Methodology Skill
Systematic approach for creating minimal, reversible implementation plans after research phase.
Auto-Invoke Triggers
- After ResearchPack is validated (score >= 80)
- Before code implementation begins
- When task requires multi-file changes
- User requests implementation plan
5-Step Methodology
Step 1: ResearchPack Review (30 sec)
- Verify ResearchPack score >= 80
- Extract required APIs and methods
- Note all gotchas and caveats
- List open questions
Step 2: Codebase Analysis (60 sec)
- Find existing patterns to follow
- Identify files to modify
- Check for similar implementations
- Map component dependencies
Step 3: Change Mapping (60 sec)
- List all files to modify/create
- Define minimal change set
- Identify dependencies between changes
- Plan test coverage
Step 4: Risk Assessment (30 sec)
- Identify potential failure points
- Assess impact on existing code
- Define rollback per change
- Flag breaking changes
Step 5: Plan Documentation (60 sec)
- Write structured ImplementationPlan
- Include verification per step
- Document rollback procedure
- Define success criteria
Output Format: ImplementationPlan
## ImplementationPlan: [Feature]
### Scope
- Files to modify: X
- New files: Y
- Tests to add: Z
### Changes
| # | File | Action | Verification |
|---|------|--------|--------------|
| 1 | path/file.ts | MODIFY | type-check |
| 2 | path/new.ts | CREATE | builds |
### Steps
1. [Step with verification]
2. [Step with verification]
### Rollback
[How to revert each change]
### Success Criteria
- [ ] npm run validate passes
- [ ] Feature works as specifiedPlanning Principles
Minimal Changes
- Only modify what's necessary
- No "while we're here" improvements
- Prefer small, focused changes
Reversibility
- Every change must be revertable
- Document rollback per step
- Keep backup strategy clear
Consistency
- Follow existing patterns
- Match naming conventions
- Use established architecture
Quality Gate
Note: the Plan >= 85 gate is owned by architect/analyst, which run on the opus tier (
model: opus,effort: high) for higher reasoning rigor. Seedocs/model-tiers.md.
Plan must score >= 85:
| Criterion | Points |
| All files listed | 15 |
| Step-by-step sequence | 15 |
| Verification per step | 15 |
| Rollback complete | 15 |
| APIs match research | 15 |
| Risk assessment | 10 |
| Test plan | 10 |
| Success criteria | 5 |
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

