agentleFS
komlukkomluk/scaffolding/skills/planning-methodology/SKILL.md

planning-methodology

Skill16 starsChanged 5 days agoMITView on GitHub

Build minimal, reversible implementation plans. TRIGGER when: turning research into a plan, or sequencing work before writing code. SKIP: gathering documentation (use research-methodology); writing OpenSpec design.md/tasks.md (use spec-design); should this exist at all (use necessity-first).

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

9 rules. About 0 are common, 9 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈9

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    After ResearchPack is validated (score >= 80)

    line 12
  2. Distinctive:

    Before code implementation begins

    line 13
  3. Distinctive:

    When task requires multi-file changes

    line 14
  4. Distinctive:

    Check for similar implementations

    line 28
  5. Distinctive:

    Only modify what's necessary

    line 81
  6. Distinctive:

    Prefer small, focused changes

    line 83
  7. Distinctive:

    Every change must be revertable

    line 86
  8. Distinctive:

    Document rollback per step

    line 87
  9. Distinctive:

    Keep backup strategy clear

    line 88

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Planning Methodology Skill

Systematic approach for creating minimal, reversible implementation plans after research phase.

Auto-Invoke Triggers

  • After ResearchPack is validated (score >= 80)
  • Before code implementation begins
  • When task requires multi-file changes
  • User requests implementation plan

5-Step Methodology

Step 1: ResearchPack Review (30 sec)

  • Verify ResearchPack score >= 80
  • Extract required APIs and methods
  • Note all gotchas and caveats
  • List open questions

Step 2: Codebase Analysis (60 sec)

  • Find existing patterns to follow
  • Identify files to modify
  • Check for similar implementations
  • Map component dependencies

Step 3: Change Mapping (60 sec)

  • List all files to modify/create
  • Define minimal change set
  • Identify dependencies between changes
  • Plan test coverage

Step 4: Risk Assessment (30 sec)

  • Identify potential failure points
  • Assess impact on existing code
  • Define rollback per change
  • Flag breaking changes

Step 5: Plan Documentation (60 sec)

  • Write structured ImplementationPlan
  • Include verification per step
  • Document rollback procedure
  • Define success criteria

Output Format: ImplementationPlan

## ImplementationPlan: [Feature]

### Scope
- Files to modify: X
- New files: Y
- Tests to add: Z

### Changes

| # | File | Action | Verification |
|---|------|--------|--------------|
| 1 | path/file.ts | MODIFY | type-check |
| 2 | path/new.ts | CREATE | builds |

### Steps
1. [Step with verification]
2. [Step with verification]

### Rollback
[How to revert each change]

### Success Criteria
- [ ] npm run validate passes
- [ ] Feature works as specified

Planning Principles

Minimal Changes

  • Only modify what's necessary
  • No "while we're here" improvements
  • Prefer small, focused changes

Reversibility

  • Every change must be revertable
  • Document rollback per step
  • Keep backup strategy clear

Consistency

  • Follow existing patterns
  • Match naming conventions
  • Use established architecture

Quality Gate

Note: the Plan >= 85 gate is owned by architect/analyst, which run on the opus tier (model: opus, effort: high) for higher reasoning rigor. See docs/model-tiers.md.

Plan must score >= 85:

CriterionPoints
All files listed15
Step-by-step sequence15
Verification per step15
Rollback complete15
APIs match research15
Risk assessment10
Test plan10
Success criteria5

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.