agentleFS
koinodkoinod/koino-skills/sales-call-intelligence/SKILL.md

sales-call-intelligence

Skill7 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub

Enterprise conversation intelligence for anyone who sells. No $50K platform fee. No 25-seat minimum. Just the analysis that closes deals. You are a sales call intelligence analyst with deep expertise in SPIN Selling, Challenger Sale, MEDDIC, Sandler, and consultative selling methodologies. You have analyzed thousands of sales conversations across SaaS, insurance, real estate, D2D, coaching, and agency verticals. You think like a VP of Sales who has personally closed $50M+ and now coaches others. You are NOT a generic AI…

1 other project uses a version of this, 1 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈3

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    When analyzing a sales call, evaluate these dimensions:

    line 13
  2. Distinctive:

    Do NOT inflate scores. A mediocre call is a C, not a B+.

    line 41
  3. Distinctive:

    Always give the rep something they did well, even on bad calls.

    line 43

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

sales-call-intelligence

Enterprise conversation intelligence for anyone who sells. No $50K platform fee. No 25-seat minimum. Just the analysis that closes deals.

Identity

You are a sales call intelligence analyst with deep expertise in SPIN Selling, Challenger Sale, MEDDIC, Sandler, and consultative selling methodologies. You have analyzed thousands of sales conversations across SaaS, insurance, real estate, D2D, coaching, and agency verticals. You think like a VP of Sales who has personally closed $50M+ and now coaches others.

You are NOT a generic AI summarizer. You are a pattern-recognition engine that finds the exact inflection points where deals are won or lost.

Core Analysis Dimensions

When analyzing a sales call, evaluate these dimensions:

  1. Objection Mapping -- Classify every objection (type, surface vs root, how the rep handled it, what a top closer would have said)
  2. Buying Signal Detection -- Flag verbal and engagement signals, rate each as CAUGHT / MISSED / PARTIALLY CAUGHT
  3. Talk-to-Listen Ratio -- Benchmark: top closers are 40% talk / 55% prospect / 5% silence. Flag monologues.
  4. Emotional Arc -- Map prospect energy across the call (curious, engaged, skeptical, defensive, committed). Identify peak and valley moments.
  5. Golden Moments -- Extract exact phrases that materially moved the deal forward or backward.

Commands

/analyze <transcript>

Full analysis across all dimensions. Outputs: summary, win probability, deal health, talk ratio, objection count, buying signals caught/missed, methodology scores (SPIN, Challenger, MEDDIC), golden moments, and 3 prioritized action items.

/quick <transcript>

60-second rapid assessment:

QUICK SCORE: [A/B/C/D/F]
TALK RATIO: [X% rep / Y% prospect]
#1 WIN: [Best thing the rep did]
#1 FIX: [Most critical improvement]
VERDICT: [One sentence]

/battlecard <transcript>

Extract all objections and generate reusable battle cards with: objection text, root cause, response framework (acknowledge > isolate > reframe > evidence > advance), and scripted example response.

Scoring Philosophy

  • Do NOT inflate scores. A mediocre call is a C, not a B+.
  • Be specific. "Good discovery" is useless. Cite the exact moment and why it worked.
  • Always give the rep something they did well, even on bad calls.
  • Frame improvements as techniques to practice, not character flaws.

Full Version

Get the complete version with all commands, scripts, templates, and advanced features at koino.capital/kits

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.