agentleFS
kodar-anderskodar-anders/combined-ai/.claude/skills/update-models/SKILL.md

update-models

Skill0 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub

Refresh this library's model registry against the providers' official docs. Checks each provider (Anthropic, OpenAI, Google/Gemini) online for models the project is missing and adds them, double-checks every price in the pricing table, re-checks and recommends the default model per provider, and removes models that are retired / no longer usable. Use when asked to "update the models", "check for new models", "refresh pricing", "verify the model table", or "check the default models".

2 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

  • Other versions2 projects use a version of this.

    Word for word · 0

    None found.

    Edited · 0

    None found.

    Wrote their own version · 2

    1. baptisteArno/typebot.io★ 11ksame name
    2. mikemorgenstern/model-router★ 0same name

    How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.

  • In this repositoryOne other file it gives its agents.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

8 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈4

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 4

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    A wrong price is worse than undefined: Never guess a price. If you can't verify a number on the official page, leave that model out of …

    line 22
  2. Distinctive:

    Don't add every niche/specialized model.

    line 27
  3. Very specific:

    Prefer WebFetch on the official pages (exact ids + prices).

    line 47
  4. Very specific:

    Read the MODELS table and each provider's DEFAULT_MODEL/DEFAULT_EMBED_MODEL.

    line 65
  5. Distinctive:

    Follow the table's conventions (they are load-bearing — see the file header):

    line 92
  6. Distinctive:

    When a default changes, update all of these together:

    line 116
  7. Very specific:

    Add entries under ## [Unreleased] in CHANGELOG.md (Keep a Changelog format): ### Added for new models, ### Changed for default/price …

    line 140
  8. Distinctive:

    Run as you go, then once at the end on the touched files:

    line 147

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Update models

Bring src/models.ts and the per-provider defaults back in sync with what the providers actually offer today. This is an interactive procedure: research online, then propose a concrete diff and confirm the judgment calls (defaults, removals) with the user before editing.

Ground rules (read first)

  • A wrong price is worse than undefined. Never guess a price. If you can't verify a number on the official page, leave that model out of the table (the cost helpers then return undefined, which is the intended safe outcome).
  • Keep the table small. It is the most commonly used models per provider (current + recent generations + the cheap tiers), not an exhaustive catalog. Don't add every niche/specialized model.
  • Confirm the judgment calls. Changing a DEFAULT_MODEL and removing a pricing entry are product decisions — surface a recommendation and use AskUserQuestion before doing either. Adding missing models and correcting a clearly-wrong price can be done directly (still report them).

Key files

  • src/models.ts — the MODELS pricing table, PRICING_VERIFIED_ON, and the findModel resolver. Read the file header and the findModel doc-comment for the full pricing/resolution rules before editing.
  • src/providers/anthropic.ts — const DEFAULT_MODEL (no embeddings).
  • src/providers/openai.ts — const DEFAULT_MODEL + DEFAULT_EMBED_MODEL.
  • src/providers/google.ts — const DEFAULT_MODEL + DEFAULT_EMBED_MODEL.
  • src/providers/__tests__/<provider>.test.ts — the default-path tests assert the default model in the request URL/body and the result (model: field).
  • README.md, CLAUDE.md, CHANGELOG.md — doc references to defaults.

Official sources

Prefer WebFetch on the official pages (exact ids + prices); use WebSearch to discover what's new and to find deprecation dates.

The current month is later than the training cutoff — do not answer from memory, always fetch. Model families move fast (e.g. tier names can change: OpenAI's 5.6 line is Sol/Terra/Luna, not mini/nano).

Procedure

1. Snapshot the current state

Read the MODELS table and each provider's DEFAULT_MODEL/DEFAULT_EMBED_MODEL. Note PRICING_VERIFIED_ON. List what the library currently knows per provider.

2. Research each provider

For Anthropic, OpenAI, and Google gather, from the official pages:

  • Current model ids exactly as used in the API (not marketing names).
  • Input / output / cached-input price per 1M tokens; any tiered pricing (e.g. Gemini 2.5 Pro > 200k prompt tokens); cache-write rate (Anthropic).
  • Which models are GA vs preview, and which are deprecated/retired with their shutdown dates.

3. Reconcile → propose a plan

Produce a concise diff plan, per provider:

  • Add — current, common models missing from the table (respect "keep it small").
  • Fix price — any table entry whose price ≠ the official page.
  • Remove — retired/shut-down models (see step 6 for the nuance).
  • Default — your recommended DEFAULT_MODEL and why.

Present this to the user before making the judgment-call edits.

4. Apply pricing-table edits (src/models.ts)

Follow the table's conventions (they are load-bearing — see the file header):

  • USD per 1M tokens. Keys are grouped by provider with a short comment.
  • Exact keys. The resolver matches k-<DIGIT>… only, so word-suffix siblings each need their own exact key (-mini, -nano, -pro, -sol, -terra, -luna, -flash-lite, …). A dated snapshot (…-2026-07-09) resolves to its base via the digit rule — don't add snapshot keys.
  • cachedInputPerMTok only when the page publishes it; omit otherwise (the cost helpers fall back to the full input rate — never fabricate a discount).
  • cacheWriteInputPerMTok — Anthropic only (1.25× input = the 5-minute TTL).
  • highTier for tiered models (aboveInputTokens + input/output/cached rates).
  • Embedding models: input-only, outputPerMTok: 0, full exact key.
  • PRICING_VERIFIED_ON: bump to today only if you re-verified all three providers' prices this run. If you checked only one provider, leave it (a table-wide stamp must not over-claim).

5. Defaults — recommend + confirm

For each provider, recommend a DEFAULT_MODEL. Good default = GA (not preview), current generation, sensible price/capability for the provider's "workhorse" tier, and not scheduled to retire soon. A same-price newer-generation successor to the existing default is the ideal move. Use AskUserQuestion to let the user pick (offer your recommendation first, marked "Recommended").

When a default changes, update all of these together:

  1. src/providers/<provider>.ts — DEFAULT_MODEL.
  2. src/providers/__tests__/<provider>.test.ts — the default-path test's URL, request-body model, and result model assertions. Keep any explicit-model override test pointed at a different model so it still proves overrides work.
  3. README.md config example (and any prose reference to the default).
  4. CLAUDE.md — the provider's one-line entry.

6. Removals — retired / not recommended

The table exists for cost calculation, and usage logs reference models long after they stop being callable — so keeping a still-relevant entry is often correct even when a model can't be newly selected. Remove an entry only when it is fully retired/shut down (or the user wants the table trimmed). Removing loses cost calc for historical usage of that model — surface that tradeoff and confirm with the user (AskUserQuestion, per-model or as a batch) before deleting. Never remove a model that is still a DEFAULT_MODEL — repoint the default first (step 5). If a model is deprecated-but-active (e.g. 404s for new keys yet still billed for existing ones until a future shutdown date), prefer to keep it with a dated retirement comment rather than remove it.

7. Changelog

Add entries under ## [Unreleased] in CHANGELOG.md (Keep a Changelog format): ### Added for new models, ### Changed for default/price changes, ### Removed for deletions. Keep it short. Do not add a dated version heading (that's a release-time step).

8. Verify (edit loop)

Run as you go, then once at the end on the touched files:

yarn eslint <changed files>
yarn typecheck
yarn prettier --write <changed files>
yarn test google models cost openai anthropic   # the suites this touches

Optional resolver sanity check via the built bundle (confirms new keys resolve and word-suffix siblings don't mis-resolve):

yarn build
node -e 'import("./dist/index.js").then(({findModel})=>{for(const m of ["<new-id>","<new-id>-2026-01-01"])console.log(m,"->",findModel(m)?.id)})'

9. Report

Summarize per provider: models added, prices corrected, models removed, and the new default (with the reasoning). State whether PRICING_VERIFIED_ON was bumped and why/why not. Remind the user nothing was committed (unless they asked).

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.