study-close
Skill0 starsChanged 43 days agoMITView on GitHub
Close the current session of the user's active study plan after its evaluation — asks the user to explain the core ideas in their own words and writes those as the session's notes, rewrites what is still weak, marks the session closed, and when the session ends a block writes the block closure summary (coverage, results, concepts, drift) ready to copy. Use whenever the user says "cerremos la sesión", "listo por hoy", "terminé", "guarda los apuntes", "close this session", or wants to wrap up a study session or a study week/block.
In this repository5 other files it gives its agents.
- study-evalSkill
- study-newSkill
- study-nextSkill
- study-sharedSkill
- study-statusSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈2
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 25
Ask: *"In your own words, what are the 2-3 ideas from this session you would explain to a colleague?"* One message, then wait.
- Distinctive: line 27
Do not lecture: the point is their wording, corrected as little as possible.
- Very specific: line 57
If external_followup: true in PLAN.md, also print that block as plain text and say it is ready to paste wherever they report.
- Very specific: line 62
Run python3 $SS status "$PLAN" and say in one line where they stand and what /study-next will open.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
/study-close — close the session with the user's own words
Notes the model writes get read once. Notes in the learner's own words are the learning. This command makes the user say the ideas back (the practice that works even with no environment to touch) and records it where the next session, and the next Claude, will find it.
Step 0
SHARED="$HOME/.claude/skills/study-shared"; SS="$SHARED/scripts/study_state.py"
PLAN=$(python3 $SS registry resolve) || exit
python3 $SS next "$PLAN"The current session must be evaluated, or studied with eval_type: none. Otherwise point to
/study-eval (or /study-next if it is still pending).
Step 1 — explain it back
Ask: "In your own words, what are the 2-3 ideas from this session you would explain to a colleague?" One message, then wait. If an idea comes back wrong or vague, ask one follow-up on it. Do not lecture: the point is their wording, corrected as little as possible.
Step 2 — write
With the Edit tool, in the session file:
notesregion: the user's ideas, lightly edited for clarity, kept in their voice. Add at most one line per idea if something essential was missing, marked as yours.weakregion: rewrite it (study-eval may have filled it after a failed attempt) with what is still not consolidated: failed or guessed concepts from this session's evaluations that are notconsolidatedin PLAN.md, plus anything the user says is still fuzzy. Each line: the concept, the correct idea in one sentence, the source link. These feed the next evaluations' review quota.
python3 $SS set "<session-file>" status=closed closed_date=$(python3 $SS today)
python3 $SS refresh "$PLAN"Step 3 — if is_checkpoint: true, close the block
Append under the Block closures heading of PLAN.md:
### Block N — closed <date from `python3 $SS today`>
- Covered: sessions a–b (<areas>)
- Checkpoint result: <score> (<type>)
- Concepts consolidated: … · still pending: …
- Drift: <on track | N sessions behind | ahead>; buffer left <x/y>If external_followup: true in PLAN.md, also print that block as plain text and say it is ready to
paste wherever they report. Do not publish it anywhere yourself.
Step 4 — hand off
Run python3 $SS status "$PLAN" and say in one line where they stand and what /study-next will
open.
Language: files in the plan's language, conversation in the user's (language.md). The notes keep
the user's own words, untranslated.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

