technical-report
Skill6 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub
Write technical reports — experiment reports, system design documents, code documentation, and internal research memos. Use when documenting technical work that doesn't fit paper format.
- Installs packages
2 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- ZimoLiao/scholaraiotheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- BGLuis/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 7, 2026
Other versions2 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 2
- ZimoLiao/scholaraio★ 585same name
- BGLuis/skills★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository75 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- agent-browserSkill
- agent-desktopSkill
- agent-expertise-protocolSkill
- ai-figure-generationSkill
- api-securitySkill
- architecture-decision-recordsSkill
- architecture-reviewSkill
- art-of-war-software-engineeringSkill
- browser-automationSkill
- business-product-leadershipSkill
- c4-level1-contextSkill
- c4-level2-containerSkill
- c4-level3-componentSkill
- c4-level4-codeSkill
- c4-modelSkill
- clean-architectureSkill
- cloud-securitySkill
- code-quality-gateSkill
- collaborative-engineering-agentSkill
- conference-paperSkill
- container-securitySkill
- database-designSkill
- ddd-coreSkill
- ddd-patternsSkill
- ddd-tacticalSkill
- defense-prepSkill
- dependency-managementSkill
- diffusion-release-trackingSkill
- docker-containerizationSkill
- dora-coreSkill
- evolutionary-architectureSkill
- exam-rubricSkill
- experiment-trackingSkill
- federated-learning-dqnSkill
- git-workflowSkill
- golang-developmentSkill
- internal-critiqueSkill
- javascript-typescriptSkill
- journal-q1-polishSkill
- kinhluan-routerSkill
- kubernetes-orchestrationSkill
- merge-request-reviewSkill
- milestone-trackerSkill
- paper-auditSkill
- paper-writingSkill
- pastureSkill
- payment-systemsSkill
- penetration-testingSkill
- phd-proposalSkill
- problem-discoverySkill
- product-analyticsSkill
- product-ux-researchSkill
- progress-reportSkill
- proposal-defenseSkill
- publication-strategySkill
- python-developmentSkill
- research-designSkill
- research-questionSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 19
Purpose: Document technical work in detail — experiments, systems, code, and internal research.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Technical Report
Purpose: Document technical work in detail — experiments, systems, code, and internal research.
When to use:
- Writing experiment reports (detailed results)
- Documenting system architecture
- Writing code documentation
- Creating internal research memos
- Preparing supplementary materials
Links to:
experiment-tracking— experiment dataresearch-design— methodologythesis-writing— thesis integrationpaper-writing— paper formatdocker-containerization— deployment docskubernetes-orchestration— infrastructure docs
Report Types
1. Experiment Report
# Experiment Report: [Experiment Name]
**Date:** [YYYY-MM-DD]
**Author:** [Name]
**Version:** [v1.0]
## 1. Objective
[What question does this experiment answer?]
## 2. Setup
### 2.1 Hardware
- GPU: [type] × [count]
- RAM: [size]
- Storage: [type/size]
### 2.2 Software
- Python: [version]
- PyTorch: [version]
- CUDA: [version]
### 2.3 Dataset
| Property | Value |
|----------|-------|
| Name | [dataset] |
| Size | [N samples] |
| Train/Val/Test | [split ratios] |
| Preprocessing | [steps] |
### 2.4 Hyperparameters
| Parameter | Search Range | Final Value | Selection |
|-----------|--------------|-------------|-----------|
| learning_rate | [1e-4, 1e-2] | 1e-3 | grid search |
| batch_size | [16, 32, 64] | 64 | validation loss |
## 3. Method
[Brief description of what was tested]
## 4. Results
### 4.1 Main Results
| Method | Accuracy | F1 | Latency |
|--------|----------|-----|---------|
| Baseline | 85.2±0.3 | 84.1±0.4 | 12ms |
| Ours | 87.1±0.2 | 86.3±0.3 | 15ms |
### 4.2 Ablation
| Configuration | Accuracy | Δ |
|---------------|----------|---|
| Full | 87.1±0.2 | — |
| w/o Module A | 85.8±0.3 | -1.3 |
| w/o Module B | 86.2±0.2 | -0.9 |
### 4.3 Statistical Analysis
- Test: paired t-test
- p-value: 0.002 (significant at α=0.05)
- Seeds: 5 (42, 123, 456, 789, 1024)
## 5. Analysis
[Interpretation of results, patterns observed]
## 6. Conclusions
[Key takeaways, next steps]
## 7. Reproducibility
- Code: [URL or "available upon request"]
- Data: [URL or "see Section 2.3"]
- Random seeds: [list]2. System Design Document
# System Design: [System Name]
**Version:** [v1.0]
**Status:** [Draft/Review/Final]
**Last Updated:** [Date]
## 1. Overview
[1 paragraph: what the system does, why it exists]
## 2. Requirements
### 2.1 Functional Requirements
- FR1: [requirement]
- FR2: [requirement]
### 2.2 Non-Functional Requirements
- NFR1: Performance — [specification]
- NFR2: Scalability — [specification]
- NFR3: Reliability — [specification]
## 3. Architecture
### 3.1 High-Level Design
[Architecture diagram]
### 3.2 Component Design
| Component | Responsibility | Interface |
|-----------|---------------|-----------|
| [comp1] | [what it does] | [API/events] |
| [comp2] | [what it does] | [API/events] |
### 3.3 Data Flow
[Sequence diagram or flowchart]
## 4. API Design
### 4.1 Endpoints
| Method | Path | Description |
|--------|------|-------------|
| GET | /api/v1/[resource] | [description] |
| POST | /api/v1/[resource] | [description] |
### 4.2 Data Models
```typescript
interface [Model] {
id: string;
field: type;
}5. Database Design
[ER diagram, schema]
6. Deployment
[Infrastructure, Docker, K8s config]
7. Testing Strategy
[Unit, integration, e2e tests]
8. Monitoring
[Metrics, alerts, dashboards]
9. Security
[Authentication, authorization, data protection]
10. Future Work
[Planned improvements]
### 3. Code Documentation
```markdown
# [Module Name] Documentation
## Overview
[What this module does]
## Installation
```bash
pip install [package]Quick Start
from module import Class
# Initialize
obj = Class(param1=value1)
# Use
result = obj.method(input)API Reference
Class: ClassName
__init__(self, param1, param2)
Description: Initialize the class.
Parameters:
| Name | Type | Default | Description |
| param1 | str | required | [description] |
| param2 | int | 10 | [description] |
Example:
obj = Class(param1="value", param2=20)method(self, input)
Description: [what it does]
Parameters:
| Name | Type | Description |
| input | np.ndarray | [description] |
Returns:
| Type | Description |
| dict | [description] |
Raises:
| Exception | Condition |
| ValueError | [when] |
Example:
result = obj.method(np.array([1, 2, 3]))Configuration
| Variable | Default | Description |
| DEBUG | False | Enable debug mode |
Changelog
v1.0.0 (YYYY-MM-DD)
- Initial release
### 4. Research Memo
```markdown
# Research Memo: [Topic]
**Date:** [YYYY-MM-DD]
**Author:** [Name]
**Status:** [Draft/Reviewed]
## Context
[Why this memo exists, what triggered it]
## Key Observations
1. [Observation 1]
2. [Observation 2]
3. [Observation 3]
## Analysis
[Detailed analysis of observations]
## Implications
[What this means for the research]
## Action Items
- [ ] [Action 1]
- [ ] [Action 2]
## References
[Related papers, experiments, discussions]Report Quality Checklist
Content
- Clear objective statement
- Sufficient detail for reproduction
- Results with mean ± std (min 3 seeds)
- Statistical significance tests
- Honest limitations acknowledged
Format
- Consistent notation
- Figures with captions
- Tables with captions
- References formatted
- Version number
- Date
Technical
- Code snippets tested
- Commands verified
- Links working
- Version numbers accurate
Integration Flow
experiment-tracking (data)
↓
technical-report (this skill)
├── Experiment Report → advisor/committee
├── System Design → team/collaborators
├── Code Documentation → users/developers
└── Research Memo → self/team
↓
thesis-writing (integrate into thesis)
↓
paper-writing (extract for paper)
↓
conference-paper (present findings)
↓
progress-report (summarize for advisor)Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

