agentleFS
kinhluankinhluan/skills/skills/technical-report/SKILL.md

technical-report

Skill6 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub

Write technical reports — experiment reports, system design documents, code documentation, and internal research memos. Use when documenting technical work that doesn't fit paper format.

  • Installs packages

2 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Purpose: Document technical work in detail — experiments, systems, code, and internal research.

    line 19

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Technical Report

Purpose: Document technical work in detail — experiments, systems, code, and internal research.

When to use:

  • Writing experiment reports (detailed results)
  • Documenting system architecture
  • Writing code documentation
  • Creating internal research memos
  • Preparing supplementary materials

Links to:

  • experiment-tracking — experiment data
  • research-design — methodology
  • thesis-writing — thesis integration
  • paper-writing — paper format
  • docker-containerization — deployment docs
  • kubernetes-orchestration — infrastructure docs

Report Types

1. Experiment Report

# Experiment Report: [Experiment Name]

**Date:** [YYYY-MM-DD]
**Author:** [Name]
**Version:** [v1.0]

## 1. Objective
[What question does this experiment answer?]

## 2. Setup

### 2.1 Hardware
- GPU: [type] × [count]
- RAM: [size]
- Storage: [type/size]

### 2.2 Software
- Python: [version]
- PyTorch: [version]
- CUDA: [version]

### 2.3 Dataset
| Property | Value |
|----------|-------|
| Name | [dataset] |
| Size | [N samples] |
| Train/Val/Test | [split ratios] |
| Preprocessing | [steps] |

### 2.4 Hyperparameters
| Parameter | Search Range | Final Value | Selection |
|-----------|--------------|-------------|-----------|
| learning_rate | [1e-4, 1e-2] | 1e-3 | grid search |
| batch_size | [16, 32, 64] | 64 | validation loss |

## 3. Method
[Brief description of what was tested]

## 4. Results

### 4.1 Main Results
| Method | Accuracy | F1 | Latency |
|--------|----------|-----|---------|
| Baseline | 85.2±0.3 | 84.1±0.4 | 12ms |
| Ours | 87.1±0.2 | 86.3±0.3 | 15ms |

### 4.2 Ablation
| Configuration | Accuracy | Δ |
|---------------|----------|---|
| Full | 87.1±0.2 | — |
| w/o Module A | 85.8±0.3 | -1.3 |
| w/o Module B | 86.2±0.2 | -0.9 |

### 4.3 Statistical Analysis
- Test: paired t-test
- p-value: 0.002 (significant at α=0.05)
- Seeds: 5 (42, 123, 456, 789, 1024)

## 5. Analysis
[Interpretation of results, patterns observed]

## 6. Conclusions
[Key takeaways, next steps]

## 7. Reproducibility
- Code: [URL or "available upon request"]
- Data: [URL or "see Section 2.3"]
- Random seeds: [list]

2. System Design Document

# System Design: [System Name]

**Version:** [v1.0]
**Status:** [Draft/Review/Final]
**Last Updated:** [Date]

## 1. Overview
[1 paragraph: what the system does, why it exists]

## 2. Requirements

### 2.1 Functional Requirements
- FR1: [requirement]
- FR2: [requirement]

### 2.2 Non-Functional Requirements
- NFR1: Performance — [specification]
- NFR2: Scalability — [specification]
- NFR3: Reliability — [specification]

## 3. Architecture

### 3.1 High-Level Design
[Architecture diagram]

### 3.2 Component Design
| Component | Responsibility | Interface |
|-----------|---------------|-----------|
| [comp1] | [what it does] | [API/events] |
| [comp2] | [what it does] | [API/events] |

### 3.3 Data Flow
[Sequence diagram or flowchart]

## 4. API Design

### 4.1 Endpoints
| Method | Path | Description |
|--------|------|-------------|
| GET | /api/v1/[resource] | [description] |
| POST | /api/v1/[resource] | [description] |

### 4.2 Data Models
```typescript
interface [Model] {
  id: string;
  field: type;
}

5. Database Design

[ER diagram, schema]

6. Deployment

[Infrastructure, Docker, K8s config]

7. Testing Strategy

[Unit, integration, e2e tests]

8. Monitoring

[Metrics, alerts, dashboards]

9. Security

[Authentication, authorization, data protection]

10. Future Work

[Planned improvements]


### 3. Code Documentation

```markdown
# [Module Name] Documentation

## Overview
[What this module does]

## Installation
```bash
pip install [package]

Quick Start

from module import Class

# Initialize
obj = Class(param1=value1)

# Use
result = obj.method(input)

API Reference

Class: ClassName

__init__(self, param1, param2)

Description: Initialize the class.

Parameters:

NameTypeDefaultDescription
param1strrequired[description]
param2int10[description]

Example:

obj = Class(param1="value", param2=20)

method(self, input)

Description: [what it does]

Parameters:

NameTypeDescription
inputnp.ndarray[description]

Returns:

TypeDescription
dict[description]

Raises:

ExceptionCondition
ValueError[when]

Example:

result = obj.method(np.array([1, 2, 3]))

Configuration

VariableDefaultDescription
DEBUGFalseEnable debug mode

Changelog

v1.0.0 (YYYY-MM-DD)

  • Initial release

### 4. Research Memo

```markdown
# Research Memo: [Topic]

**Date:** [YYYY-MM-DD]
**Author:** [Name]
**Status:** [Draft/Reviewed]

## Context
[Why this memo exists, what triggered it]

## Key Observations
1. [Observation 1]
2. [Observation 2]
3. [Observation 3]

## Analysis
[Detailed analysis of observations]

## Implications
[What this means for the research]

## Action Items
- [ ] [Action 1]
- [ ] [Action 2]

## References
[Related papers, experiments, discussions]

Report Quality Checklist

Content

  • Clear objective statement
  • Sufficient detail for reproduction
  • Results with mean ± std (min 3 seeds)
  • Statistical significance tests
  • Honest limitations acknowledged

Format

  • Consistent notation
  • Figures with captions
  • Tables with captions
  • References formatted
  • Version number
  • Date

Technical

  • Code snippets tested
  • Commands verified
  • Links working
  • Version numbers accurate

Integration Flow

experiment-tracking (data)
    ↓
technical-report (this skill)
    ├── Experiment Report → advisor/committee
    ├── System Design → team/collaborators
    ├── Code Documentation → users/developers
    └── Research Memo → self/team
    ↓
thesis-writing (integrate into thesis)
    ↓
paper-writing (extract for paper)
    ↓
conference-paper (present findings)
    ↓
progress-report (summarize for advisor)

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.