analyze-failures
Skill9 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Analyze failure patterns from events.jsonl. Use after completing a complex task to identify recurring issues.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- katalon-labs/true-skillstheir own version, first seen Jun 23, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- katalon-labs/true-skills★ 10same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository29 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- anti-debugging-techniquesSkill
- anti-drift-disciplineSkill
- binary-protection-bypassSkill
- code-obfuscation-deobfuscationSkill
- distillSkill
- dwarf-expertSkill
- emulation-reSkill
- find-skillsSkill
- ida-mcpSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- diagnosing-bugsSkill
- domain-modelingSkill
- implementSkill
- prototypeSkill
- researchSkill
- resolving-merge-conflictsSkill
- tddSkill
- to-specSkill
- writing-great-skillsSkill
- mobile-dynamic-reSkill
- native-static-reSkill
- physarumSkill
- re-escalationSkill
- re-routerSkill
- stormSkill
- symbolic-execution-toolsSkill
- vm-and-bytecode-reverseSkill
- web-reverse-engineeringSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈2
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 7
After completing a complex investigation or encountering repeated issues, use this skill to systematically analyze the event log for …
- Very specific: line 44
Use board with action=distill, the relative path above, and the selected scope.
- Very specific: line 48
After board close on a complex topic (especially if multiple spawn rounds occurred)
- Distinctive: line 49
When you notice the same hook_warn firing repeatedly
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Analyze Failures: Mine Patterns from Event Log
After completing a complex investigation or encountering repeated issues, use this skill to systematically analyze the event log for failure patterns.
Process
Step 1: Read Event Log
read .pi-board/events.jsonlFilter for failure-related events: hook_warn, hook_fail_loud, hook_block.
Step 2: Cluster by Rule
Group failures by their rule field:
read-before-write— files modified without reading firstdiff-scope-observation— too many files touchedfail-loud— bash commands failing silentlyconvergence-gate— premature close attemptsspawn-round-guard— excessive spawn rounds
Step 3: Identify Patterns
For each cluster with ≥2 occurrences, ask:
- Root cause: Why does this keep happening?
- Is it a doctrine gap? (Agent doesn't know better → improve doctrine)
- Is it a skill gap? (Agent can't do better → add tool/skill)
- Is it environmental? (External issue → document workaround)
Step 4: Distill into Knowledge
For actionable project patterns, use the project knowledge tier:
- Path:
failures/<pattern-name>.md - Scope:
projectfor one component,workspacefor related components,globalacross repositories - Content: description + root cause + mitigation
- Source:
events.jsonl entries at timestamps X, Y, Z
Use board with action=distill, the relative path above, and the selected scope.
When to Use
- After
board closeon a complex topic (especially if multiple spawn rounds occurred) - When you notice the same hook_warn firing repeatedly
- Periodically (every ~5 topics) as maintenance
Output
A brief report: which patterns found, severity, suggested mitigation. If a pattern suggests a doctrine change, flag it for human review.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

