triage-finding
Skill0 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Triage an external finding such as a post, article, repo, screenshot, video, note, or link and decide whether it matters now. Use when the user wants a verdict, not just a summary.
2 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- openai/codex-securitytheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- openai/pluginstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
Other versions2 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 2
- openai/codex-security★ 11ksame name
- openai/plugins★ 7.8ksame name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository37 other files it gives its agents.
- adr-logSkill
- adversarial-reviewSkill
- ai-writing-detoxSkill
- autonomous-video-pipelineSkill
- browser-tutorial-videoSkill
- codex-execution-packSkill
- continuity-ledgerSkill
- github-mobile-opsSkill
- github-seoSkill
- idea-validationSkill
- illustration-promptSkill
- issue-control-loopSkill
- justdoitSkill
- lazy-seniorSkill
- long-context-dispatchSkill
- openclaw-councilSkill
- parallel-worktreesSkill
- playwrightSkill
- product-councilSkill
- product-shapingSkill
- public-artifact-laneSkill
- readme-generatorSkill
- screenshotSkill
- session-to-postSkill
- spec-bundleSkill
- spreadsheetSkill
- spreadsheet-tabular-analysisSkill
- spreadsheet-xlsx-editSkill
- tool-scoutSkill
- transcribe-basicSkill
- transcribe-diarizeSkill
- transcribeSkill
- video-builderSkill
- video-render-runSkill
- video-spec-builderSkill
- visual-explainerSkill
- work-shapingSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 10
Do not use when: the user only wants a raw summary and no verdict or routing decision.
- Distinctive: line 18
Check for local duplicates or existing use before recommending action, then map the finding to current work, repos, or issue state.
- Distinctive: line 25
Do not install tools or create files unless the user explicitly asked for that step.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Triage Finding
Metadata
- Trigger when: the input is an outside finding and the real question is whether it deserves action in the current context.
- Do not use when: the user only wants a raw summary and no verdict or routing decision.
Skill Purpose
Inspect an external finding against the primary source, local reality, and current work so the result is a usable verdict instead of yet another pile of interesting links.
Instructions
- Inspect the primary source first and fact-check the main claim. Use
~/.codex/skills/triage-finding/references/source-handling.mdwhen you need source-type handling rules. - Check for local duplicates or existing use before recommending action, then map the finding to current work, repos, or issue state. If it is already installed or already in use, say that before anything else.
- Give exactly one primary verdict and the smallest useful next action. Use
~/.codex/skills/triage-finding/references/verdicts.mdonly when you need the verdict frame.
Non-Negotiable Acceptance Criteria
- Primary source truth beats repost or commentary.
- Weak findings do not get stretched into fake relevance.
- The answer names whether the finding is already installed, duplicated, or already in use.
- Do not install tools or create files unless the user explicitly asked for that step.
Output
- A structured verdict with
What is this,Fact-check notes,Duplicate check,Where it applies,Recommendation, andSmallest next step. - For multiple findings, a short summary table of verdicts.
- One clear primary recommendation: apply now, save for later, or not relevant.
Next skill options(only if needed):$tool-scout— research the broader external landscape around the finding;$skill-creator— turn a reusable workflow insight into a skill;$product-council— stress-test a finding that could change direction;$adr-log— record a finding that has turned into a durable decision.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

