deep-research
Skill2 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Deep research - end-to-end source-backed workflow that turns a research question into an agent-authored, cited brief with raw source captures. Use when a task needs a literature review, technical investigation, market or competitive intelligence, current-state analysis, any answer whose claims must be traceable to sources, or durable research artifacts in a vault.
- Installs packages
196 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- ridelink0/ultimate-frontend-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- chrisblattman/claudeblattmantheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- genericService/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- ourostack/ouroboros-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- mahsumaktas/agent-evolution-kittheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- insight68/Skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use community-led-growth, ph-community-outreach and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
nicepkgSkillcommunity-led-growth
Expert in community-led growth (CLG) - leveraging user communities to drive acquisition, retention, and expansion. Covers building developer communities, user groups, ambassador programs, and turning customers into advocates. Knows the difference between community as a feature vs community as a growth engine, and how to measure community ROI. Use when "community-led, CLG, ambassador program, champion program, user community, developer community, word of mouth, user group, " mentioned.
Also in 5 projects that use this
nicepkgSkillph-community-outreach
Engage Reddit, Indie Hackers, Hacker News and other communities for Product Hunt launches. Use this skill to identify relevant communities, craft appropriate posts, and drive cross-platform engagement without appearing spammy.
Also in 5 projects that use this
W-MoorerSkillacademic-paper-reviewer
Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Simulates 5 independent reviewers (EIC + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy.
Also in 11 projects that use this
W-MoorerSkillacademic-pipeline
Orchestrator for the full academic research pipeline: research -> write -> integrity check -> review -> revise -> re-review -> re-revise -> final integrity check -> finalize. Coordinates deep-research, academic-paper, and academic-paper-reviewer into a seamless 10-stage workflow with mandatory integrity verification, two-stage peer review, and reproducible quality gates. Triggers on: academic pipeline, research to paper, full paper workflow, paper pipeline, end-to-end paper, research-to-publication, complete paper workflow.
Also in 10 projects that use this
xfstudioSkillmicro-saas-launcher
Expert in launching small, focused SaaS products fast - the indie hacker approach to building profitable software. Covers idea validation, MVP development, pricing, launch strategies, and growing to sustainable revenue. Ship in weeks, not months. Use when: micro saas, indie hacker, small saas, side project, saas mvp.
Also in 5 projects that use this
stophobiaSkillsurprise-me
Create a delightful, unexpected "wow" experience for the user by dynamically discovering and creatively combining other enabled skills. Triggers when the user says "surprise me" or any request expressing a desire for an unexpected creative showcase. Also triggers when the user is bored, wants inspiration, or asks for "something interesting".
Also in 4 projects that use this
- +4 more from nicepkg
- +1 more from W-Moorer
Other versions196 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 196
- affaan-m/ECC★ 246ksame name
- bytedance/deer-flow★ 85ksame name
- Imbad0202/academic-research-skills★ 56ksame name
- THU-MAIC/OpenMAIC★ 43ksame name
- HKUSTDial/Supervisor-Skills★ 12ksame name
- genspark-ai/genoffice★ 12ksame name
- advaitpaliwal/feynman★ 10ksame name
- companion-inc/feynman★ 10ksame name
- getcompanion-ai/feynman★ 10ksame name
- jordan-gibbs/hyperresearch★ 4.4ksame name
186 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository4 other files it gives its agents.
- advanced-web-searchSkill
- crawl4aiSkill
- wiki-ingestSkill
- wiki-lintSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
16 rules. 0 are common, 9 are distinctive, and 7 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 177 edited versions we read keep these.
9
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
7
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 16
Prefer official, primary, and direct sources.
- Distinctive: line 17
Use multiple targeted query classes, not one broad query.
- Distinctive: line 18
Treat search snippets as leads, not evidence.
- Very specific: line 35
Use advanced-web-search/scripts/opencli_google_search.py when it is available.
- Very specific: line 37
Always save discovery output to a JSON file with --output:
- Very specific: line 48
If the user asks for a required count, set --max-results to that count or higher and verify the JSON contains the number of unique URLs …
- Distinctive: line 72
Use the Hermes Obsidian date-root layout:
- Distinctive: line 101
Use official APIs, raw repository files, arXiv HTML/PDF, regulator pages, standards, filings, Crawl4AI captures, or browser views as needed.
- Distinctive: line 107
Create a compact matrix before writing conclusions:
- Distinctive: line 118
Write the final artifacts before returning a summary:
- Very specific: line 128
Every key finding sourced from crawled material must include one or more - Raw File: [[YYYY-MM-DD/Raw/Topic-Slug/File-Stem]] lines.
- Very specific: line 132
Use templates/research-brief.md, templates/source-note.md, and templates/source-index.md when creating files.
- Very specific: line 134
If this skill is copied without the sibling crawl4ai skill, use scripts/batch_capture.py for a small standalone Crawl4AI-based capture …
- Distinctive: line 138
If the user specifies a cutoff, split sources into:
- Distinctive: line 145
Do not silently mix these categories.
- Very specific: line 167
every major finding has a Raw File wiki-link or explicit (not crawled) note
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 177 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Deep Research
Overview
Use this skill for research where claims must be traceable to sources. It is harness-neutral, but the default discovery-to-capture path is explicit: use sibling advanced-web-search/scripts/opencli_google_search.py to save candidate URLs as JSON, then use this skill's scripts/batch_capture.py --search-json to crawl them with Crawl4AI, then read the raw markdown and write the final brief.
Runtime requirement: Crawl4AI must be installed for raw capture. Install with python -m pip install -U crawl4ai, then run crawl4ai-setup and crawl4ai-doctor. See ../crawl4ai/SKILL.md.
Operating Contract
- Prefer official, primary, and direct sources.
- Use multiple targeted query classes, not one broad query.
- Treat search snippets as leads, not evidence.
- Inspect extraction quality; do not treat HTTP success as content success.
- Separate facts, interpretation, recommendations, counter-evidence, open questions, and confidence.
- Cite material claims with URLs or local raw/source artifact paths.
- Label blocked, partial, old, borderline, and inferred evidence.
- For durable research, write artifacts in the Hermes Obsidian layout, not a generic flat folder.
Workflow
Phase 0: Scope
Restate the question, decision target, constraints, time window, output format, and source classes needed. Ask a concise clarifying question only if ambiguity changes the source universe or tool calls materially.
Completion: scope is clear enough to define at least four query classes.
Phase 1: Discovery
Use advanced-web-search/scripts/opencli_google_search.py when it is available. Do not use a harness built-in web search as the primary discovery step when OpenCLI is available. Read references/query-patterns.md when constructing the search plan.
Always save discovery output to a JSON file with --output:
python ../advanced-web-search/scripts/opencli_google_search.py \
--query "Hybrid XBRL tagging after:2026-03-01" \
--query "site:github.com XBRL AI tagging after:2026-03-01" \
--max-results 30 \
--pages 8 \
--output outputs/hybrid_xbrl_sources.jsonIf the user asks for a required count, set --max-results to that count or higher and verify the JSON contains the number of unique URLs requested. If fewer are available, record the shortfall and continue with the available sources.
Collect candidate URLs across:
- official and primary sources
- code repositories, issues, releases, and docs
- academic or technical papers
- community/user evidence
- risks, limitations, and counter-evidence
- recent updates
- competitive or market sources
Completion: outputs/<topic>.json exists, contains deduplicated candidate URLs from opencli_google_search.py, and candidates include primary/direct evidence and at least one counter-evidence path where relevant.
Phase 2: Source Selection
Triage each candidate by credibility, relevance, source type, date/version, and extraction status. Read references/source-quality-rubric.md when confidence matters or sources conflict.
Completion: selected sources are sufficient to answer the question, or gaps are explicit.
Phase 3: Direct Capture
Capture selected sources directly with crawl4ai whenever pages are reachable. Use browser/fetch/API fallbacks for pages Crawl4AI cannot access cleanly. Save raw excerpts or full captures when the task is large, audit-sensitive, or the user asks for artifacts.
Use the Hermes Obsidian date-root layout:
Research/
Index/
Research_Index.md
YYYY-MM-DD/
Briefs/
Topic-Slug.md
Raw/
Topic-Slug/
01_Source_Site_Heading.md
Sources/
Topic-Slug_Source_Index.mdRaw files must be named with stable readable IDs, for example 01_FinTagging_arxiv.md, KDA_Agentic-CUDA-Opt.md, Reddit_LocalLLaMA_Speed-Bench.md, or X_CodeZakh_GPU-LLM.md.
Phase 3 normally starts from the JSON saved in Phase 1. Feed that file directly to the bundled capture helper:
python scripts/batch_capture.py \
--search-json outputs/hybrid_xbrl_sources.json \
--topic Hybrid-XBRL-Tagging \
--vault /path/to/Obsidian-vault/HermesThe helper extracts unique url fields, preserves search metadata where available, crawls each URL with Crawl4AI, and writes raw captures, source index, capture JSON, and the research index entry — everything except the brief, which is agent-authored (Phase 5). It is cross-platform (pathlib); use python3 where that is the installed name.
Use official APIs, raw repository files, arXiv HTML/PDF, regulator pages, standards, filings, Crawl4AI captures, or browser views as needed. If a source is blocked, partial, empty, or JavaScript-only, label it and try a stronger fallback before downgrading to secondary summaries.
Completion: each key claim has direct evidence or is explicitly marked unverified/inferred.
Phase 4: Evidence Matrix
Create a compact matrix before writing conclusions:
| Claim ID | Claim | Evidence | Source(s) | Evidence type | Confidence | Caveats |
Evidence types: primary source, official documentation, paper/preprint, code/repository evidence, regulator/filing/standard, secondary analysis, community/anecdotal, inferred.
Completion: every recommendation maps to one or more claim IDs.
Phase 5: Synthesis
Write the final artifacts before returning a summary:
- Research index entry in
Research/Index/Research_Index.md. - Source index in
Research/YYYY-MM-DD/Sources/<Topic-Slug>_Source_Index.md. - Agent-authored final brief in
Research/YYYY-MM-DD/Briefs/<Topic-Slug>.md. - Optional benchmark/process report in
Research/Reports/when the task compares methods, agents, or runtimes. - Optional standalone paper notes in
Research/Papers/for important papers that deserve their own note.
The brief is agent-authored: written only after reading the raw markdown captures, never assembled from capture-helper output, search snippets, source titles, or a scaffold. It should follow the Hermes narrative format: H1 title, **Research Brief | YYYY-MM-DD**, ## Source Index: [[...]], executive summary, key findings or key source briefs, claims table with confidence, consensus/dissent, gaps, and research log. Avoid link spam; put the full URL list in the source index and use raw-file links only where they support a finding.
Every key finding sourced from crawled material must include one or more - **Raw File:** [[YYYY-MM-DD/Raw/Topic-Slug/File-Stem]] lines. If a source was selected but not crawled, write - **Raw File:** (not crawled) and explain why.
The source index must group sources by type and include URL, source type, raw file wiki-link, and credibility. Include a Failed / Blocked Sources table when any source could not be captured.
Use templates/research-brief.md, templates/source-note.md, and templates/source-index.md when creating files. The research brief template is for agent-written synthesis, not for automatic capture generation.
If this skill is copied without the sibling crawl4ai skill, use scripts/batch_capture.py for a small standalone Crawl4AI-based capture helper.
Time-Bounded Research
If the user specifies a cutoff, split sources into:
- strict post-cutoff
- borderline or unclear date
- older but updated after cutoff
- older context only
Do not silently mix these categories. For ambiguous requests such as "after March 2026", state whether strict means April 1, 2026 onward or March 1, 2026 onward.
References
references/query-patterns.mdfor query class examples.references/source-quality-rubric.mdfor credibility, relevance, and confidence.references/obsidian-layout.mdfor Hermes-style vault paths, filenames, and wiki-links.../crawl4ai/SKILL.mdfor crawling, raw markdown capture, and extraction quality checks.
Quality Gate
Before finalizing, verify:
advanced-web-search/scripts/opencli_google_search.pywas used for primary discovery when available- the search command used
--output <json-file>; do not rely on stdout or shell redirection for the handoff - the saved JSON file was passed to
scripts/batch_capture.py --search-json <json-file> - more than one query class was used unless the user explicitly requested one query
- important facts were checked from direct sources
- Crawl4AI or an equivalent crawler captured raw content for key reachable sources
- raw captures are under
Research/YYYY-MM-DD/Raw/<Topic-Slug>/ - source index is under
Research/YYYY-MM-DD/Sources/and linked near the top of the brief - the brief is agent-authored: written after reading raw markdown files, not copied from titles/snippets or generated by
batch_capture.py - every major finding has a
Raw Filewiki-link or explicit(not crawled)note - primary sources were prioritized
- extraction quality was inspected
- counter-evidence or limitations were included
- confidence and evidence type were labeled
- material claims have citations
- gaps are stated instead of guessed
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

