agentleFS
kevmookevmoo/dash_skills/skills/dart-doc-validation/SKILL.md

dart-doc-validation

Skill148 starsChanged 13 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Best practices for validating Dart documentation comments. Covers using `dart doc` to catch unresolved references and macros.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈2

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use this skill when:

    line 17
  2. Distinctive:

    Do NOT apply this skill or refactor doc comments when:

    line 25

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Dart Doc Validation

1. When to use this skill

Use this skill when:

  • Writing or updating documentation comments (///) in Dart code.
  • Checking for broken documentation links, references, or macros.
  • Preparing a package for publishing to pub.dev.

When NOT to use (Abstention Guardrails)

Do NOT apply this skill or refactor doc comments when:

  • Illustrative Pseudo-Code & Non-Dart Code Fences: Comments contain pseudo-code, non-Dart language identifiers (e.g. yaml`, json, ````bash, ````text`), or abstract conceptual fragments intentionally not designed to compile as valid Dart.
  • Generated Code: Files generated by tools (e.g. *.g.dart, *.mocks.dart, *.freezed.dart) where comments are synthesized.
  • External Markdown Hyperlinks: Text in square brackets followed by a link target (e.g. [External Guide](https://...)), which is standard Markdown hyperlink syntax rather than an unresolved Dart doc reference.

Discovery

To find documentation issues:

Missing Lint

Verify if the comment_references lint is enabled:

  • Target: analysis_options.yaml
  • Search Query: comment_references

Automated Validation

Run the documentation generator to surface warnings:

  • Command: dart doc -o $(mktemp -d)
  • Keywords to look for: warning:, unresolved doc reference, undefined macro

2. Best Practices

Enable the doc validation lint

In your analysis_options.yaml, enable the comment_references lint.

linter:
  rules:
    - comment_references

Validating Documentation Locally

Use the dart doc command with a temporary output directory to validate documentation comments without polluting the local project workspace.

This command parses all documentation comments and reports warnings such as:

  • warning: unresolved doc reference
  • warning: undefined macro

Command to run:

dart doc -o $(mktemp -d)

This will work on Mac and Linux.

This ensures that the generated HTML files are stored in a temporary location and don't clutter the package directory, while still surfacing all validation warnings in the terminal output.

Browsing the docs:

Our docs use features designed to be run on a web server. If you want to browse the generated docs locally, install the dhttpd package.

dart install dhttpd
TMP_DIR=$(mktemp -d) && dart doc -o "$TMP_DIR" &&  dhttpd --path "$TMP_DIR"

(Or use another HTTP server, such as python3 -m http.server.)

Fixing Common Warnings

  • Unresolved doc reference: Ensure that any identifier wrapped in square brackets ([Identifier]) correctly points to an existing class, method, property, or parameter in the current scope or imported libraries.
  • Undefined macro: If using {@macro macro_name}, ensure that the template {@template macro_name} is defined in the same file or a file that is imported and visible to the documentation generator.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.