data-quality-sweep
Skill4 starsChanged 10 days agoCC-BY-SA-4.0View on GitHub
Sweeps a data range in the open workbook for conditions that break reporting: mixed types in a column, numbers and dates stored as text, duplicates on the apparent key, inconsistent category spellings, out of range values, blanks that are meaningful, and inconsistent date formats. Corrects nothing. Use when the user asks to check data quality, find problems in a dataset, or audit a table before analysis.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈4
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
Licensed with conditions — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
In this repository27 other files it gives its agents.
- runtimes/claude.mdCLAUDE.md
- accessibility-passSkill
- action-title-rewriteSkill
- ai-writing-tells-checkSkill
- appendix-splitSkill
- assumptions-registerSkill
- brand-rules-checkSkill
- chart-intent-checkSkill
- decision-slideSkill
- deck-consistency-sweepSkill
- deck-message-reviewSkill
- deck-trim-proposalSkill
- executive-summary-slideSkill
- formula-risk-reviewSkill
- lookup-integrity-checkSkill
- model-mapSkill
- native-diagram-slideSkill
- numbers-and-claims-checkSkill
- outline-first-deckSkill
- reconciliation-checkSkill
- scenario-skeletonSkill
- speaker-notes-builderSkill
- steering-committee-status-deckSkill
- units-and-rounding-checkSkill
- variance-explainerSkill
- workbook-handover-noteSkill
- workbook-structure-auditSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.