quality-score-fixer
Skill2 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use Google Ads Quality Score components to find the weakest link behind a valuable keyword and draft the smallest useful test. Use when relevance, CTR, or landing-page experience may be holding Search back.
3 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Insightful-Pipe/google-ads-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Insightful-Pipe/marketing-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 11, 2026
- riz1k9/claude-ad-skillstheir own version, first seen Aug 13, 2026
Other versions3 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 3
- Insightful-Pipe/google-ads-skills★ 0same name
- Insightful-Pipe/marketing-skills★ 0same name
- riz1k9/claude-ad-skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository11 other files it gives its agents.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.
4
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 14
When valuable keywords show below-average Quality Score components or weak Search performance.
- Distinctive: line 15
Use a connected Google Ads MCP, or paste keyword metrics, component ratings, triggered queries, current ads, and landing-page copy.
- Distinctive: line 40
Never pause a profitable or strategically valuable keyword only because its score is low.
- Distinctive: line 42
Do not claim that moving from one score to another cuts CPC by a fixed percentage.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Quality Score Fixer
Doctrine
Quality Score is a diagnostic, not a KPI and not a direct auction input. The useful part is the three component ratings: expected click-through rate, ad relevance, and landing-page experience. Diagnose the component, weigh it against real business performance, and test the smallest credible fix. Do not chase a prettier 1-to-10 number at the expense of conversions.
When to use
- When valuable keywords show below-average Quality Score components or weak Search performance.
- Use a connected Google Ads MCP, or paste keyword metrics, component ratings, triggered queries, current ads, and landing-page copy.
- Bring the primary conversion, target CPA or ROAS, conversion delay, and downstream quality where available.
Run it
Run a READ-ONLY Quality Score diagnosis. Use live Google Ads data if connected; otherwise use what I paste. Change nothing.
1. Confirm the date range, primary conversion, target, and keyword-level spend, clicks, conversions, value, Quality Score, expected CTR, ad relevance, and landing-page experience.
2. Prioritize commercially important keywords with below-average components. Do not rank work by the 1-to-10 score alone.
3. For each diagnosis show: weak component, business importance, observed evidence, competing evidence, root-cause hypothesis, confidence, smallest useful test, and success measure.
4. Use triggered queries, current ad assets, and page copy to test message match before proposing a rewrite.
5. Keep fixes component-specific:
- expected CTR: query fit and distinct, credible ad assets;
- ad relevance: tighter alignment among query, keyword, ad group, and ad promise;
- landing-page experience: message match, usefulness, usability, speed evidence, and one clear next step.
6. Measure both the component rating and business results after enough data and conversion delay. A component can improve while CPA gets worse.
7. If asked for savings, say they cannot be estimated from Quality Score alone. Only calculate a scenario from user-supplied CPC, traffic, conversion, and validated assumptions, labeled as a scenario rather than a forecast.
Do not change bids, keywords, ads, or pages. Do not promise a future score, rank, CPC reduction, or savings. End with "No changes were made."Guardrails
- Quality Score helps diagnose user experience. It is not a business outcome and the displayed score is not a direct auction input.
- Never pause a profitable or strategically valuable keyword only because its score is low.
- A below-average component points to where to investigate, not the exact root cause.
- Do not claim that moving from one score to another cuts CPC by a fixed percentage.
- Fix message and experience problems before treating a higher bid as the answer.
Good output looks like
A short list of component-level diagnoses tied to valuable keywords, each with evidence, one test, and an honest success measure. No fake savings forecast and no bid change.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

