prd-to-plan
Skill3 starsChanged 8 months agoCC0-1.0View on GitHub
Turn a PRD into a multi-phase implementation plan using tracer-bullet vertical slices, saved as a local Markdown file in ./plans/. Use when user wants to break down a PRD, create an implementation plan, plan phases from a PRD, or mentions "tracer bullets".
24 other projects use a version of this, 9 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- tada5hi/skillsword for word, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- datnt97/claude-skillsedited, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- Pitcocy/skillsedited, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- amit-t/skillsedited, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- iPwnPancakes/skillsedited, first seen Oct 17, 2026
- scoobydont-666/shared-claude-skillsedited, first seen Oct 13, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use obsidian-vault and migrate-to-shoehorn.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
simo97Skillobsidian-vault
Also in 3 projects that use this
simo97Skillmigrate-to-shoehorn
Migrate test files from `as` type assertions to @total-typescript/shoehorn. Use when user mentions shoehorn, wants to replace `as` in tests, or needs partial test data.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions24 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 13
- jewbetcha/openflight★ 1.2k100% same
- HK-hub/AgentSkills★ 6100% same
- shreyas-makes/agent-skills★ 2100% same
- tada5hi/skills★ 2100% same
- arturlimaaa/skills★ 1100% same
- moiznoorani/skills★ 1100% same
- NISTALTALSON/essential-claude-skills★ 1100% same
- Odineer/Skills★ 1100% same
- BrianProcopio/claude-skills★ 0100% same
- coderbaba0/ai_agents_skills★ 0100% same
3 more not listed
Edited · 9
- webiny/webiny-js★ 8k99% same
- Code-Shock/claude-skills★ 528% same
- amit-t/skills★ 482% same
- qhuang20/shazam★ 494% same
- andrewjohnharvey/skills★ 193% same
- datnt97/claude-skills★ 195% same
- iPwnPancakes/skills★ 1100% same
- Pitcocy/skills★ 188% same
- scoobydont-666/shared-claude-skills★ 189% same
Wrote their own version · 2
- haixcoder/skills★ 2same name
- DROOdotFOO/agent-skills★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository48 other files it gives its agents.
- 3d-printingSkill
- app-securitySkill
- architecture-designSkill
- aws-genai-lensSkill
- aws-well-architected-frameworkSkill
- aws-well-architectedSkill
- azure-well-architectedSkill
- blog-post-with-diagramsSkill
- clean-architectureSkill
- clean-codeSkill
- databricks-genie-spaces-best-practicesSkill
- data-visualization-guideSkill
- design-an-interfaceSkill
- design-patternsSkill
- domain-driven-designSkill
- dry-principleSkill
- edit-articleSkill
- event-driven-designSkill
- git-best-practicesSkill
- git-guardrails-claude-codeSkill
- grill-meSkill
- hexagonal-architectureSkill
- improve-codebase-architectureSkill
- language-conventions-source-en-docs-brSkill
- learn-electronicsSkill
- linked-dataSkill
- microservices-skillSkill
- object-oriented-programmingSkill
- oop-design-patternsSkill
- oreilly-design-referenceSkill
- organize-docs-from-zipSkill
- prd-to-issuesSkill
- project-context-syncSkill
- request-refactor-planSkill
- rfc2119Skill
- scaffold-exercisesSkill
- semverSkill
- setup-pre-commitSkill
- solid-principlesSkill
- tddSkill
- todoSkill
- triage-issueSkill
- ts-otp-awsSkill
- ubiquitous-languageSkill
- ux-design-principlesSkill
- write-a-prdSkill
- write-a-skillSkill
- yagni-principleSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
7 rules. 6 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
6
Common
Most of the 11 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Common: line 18
If you have not already explored the codebase, do so to understand the current architecture, existing patterns, and integration layers.
- Common: line 22
Before slicing, identify high-level decisions that are unlikely to change throughout implementation:
- Common: line 39
Prefer many thin slices over few thick ones
- Common: line 40
Do NOT include specific file names, function names, or implementation details that are likely to change as later phases are built
- Common: line 41
DO include durable decisions: route paths, schema shapes, data model names </vertical-slice-rules>
- Common: line 54
Should any phases be merged or split further?
- Very specific: line 60
Create ./plans/ if it doesn't exist.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 11 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
PRD to Plan
Break a PRD into a phased implementation plan using vertical slices (tracer bullets). Output is a Markdown file in ./plans/.
Process
1. Confirm the PRD is in context
The PRD should already be in the conversation. If it isn't, ask the user to paste it or point you to the file.
2. Explore the codebase
If you have not already explored the codebase, do so to understand the current architecture, existing patterns, and integration layers.
3. Identify durable architectural decisions
Before slicing, identify high-level decisions that are unlikely to change throughout implementation:
- Route structures / URL patterns
- Database schema shape
- Key data models
- Authentication / authorization approach
- Third-party service boundaries
These go in the plan header so every phase can reference them.
4. Draft vertical slices
Break the PRD into tracer bullet phases. Each phase is a thin vertical slice that cuts through ALL integration layers end-to-end, NOT a horizontal slice of one layer.
<vertical-slice-rules>
- Each slice delivers a narrow but COMPLETE path through every layer (schema, API, UI, tests)
- A completed slice is demoable or verifiable on its own
- Prefer many thin slices over few thick ones
- Do NOT include specific file names, function names, or implementation details that are likely to change as later phases are built
- DO include durable decisions: route paths, schema shapes, data model names
</vertical-slice-rules>5. Quiz the user
Present the proposed breakdown as a numbered list. For each phase show:
- Title: short descriptive name
- User stories covered: which user stories from the PRD this addresses
Ask the user:
- Does the granularity feel right? (too coarse / too fine)
- Should any phases be merged or split further?
Iterate until the user approves the breakdown.
6. Write the plan file
Create ./plans/ if it doesn't exist. Write the plan as a Markdown file named after the feature (e.g. ./plans/user-onboarding.md). Use the template below.
<plan-template>
# Plan: <Feature Name>Source PRD:
<brief identifier or link>
Architectural decisions
Durable decisions that apply across all phases:
- Routes: ...
- Schema: ...
- Key models: ...
- (add/remove sections as appropriate)
Phase 1: <Title>
User stories: <list from PRD>
What to build
A concise description of this vertical slice. Describe the end-to-end behavior, not layer-by-layer implementation.
Acceptance criteria
- Criterion 1
- Criterion 2
- Criterion 3
Phase 2: <Title>
User stories: <list from PRD>
What to build
...
Acceptance criteria
- ...
<!-- Repeat for each phase --></plan-template>Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

