security-audit
Skill1 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub
Run an OWASP-style security audit on the current diff, the working tree, or a specified path. Flags injection, auth flaws, secrets, insecure deserialization, and misconfigurations.
- Reads credentials
192 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- argos-ci/argostheir own version, first seen Nov 9, 2026
- classroomio/classroomiotheir own version, first seen Nov 9, 2026
- dio-az/dotfilestheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- roke22/Squadratheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- qwwiwi/agentos-skills-publictheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- craigcossairt/trellistheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use create-stories, story-done and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
lilangMaxSkillcreate-stories
Break a single epic into implementable story files. Reads the epic, its GDD, governing ADRs, and control manifest. Each story embeds its GDD requirement TR-ID, ADR guidance, acceptance criteria, story type, and test evidence path. Run after /create-epics for each epic.
Also in 11 projects that use this
lilangMaxSkillstory-done
End-of-story completion review. Reads the story file, verifies each acceptance criterion against the implementation, checks for GDD/ADR deviations, prompts code review, updates story status to Complete, and surfaces the next ready story from the sprint.
Also in 11 projects that use this
nicepkgSkillcommunity-led-growth
Expert in community-led growth (CLG) - leveraging user communities to drive acquisition, retention, and expansion. Covers building developer communities, user groups, ambassador programs, and turning customers into advocates. Knows the difference between community as a feature vs community as a growth engine, and how to measure community ROI. Use when "community-led, CLG, ambassador program, champion program, user community, developer community, word of mouth, user group, " mentioned.
Also in 5 projects that use this
nicepkgSkillph-community-outreach
Engage Reddit, Indie Hackers, Hacker News and other communities for Product Hunt launches. Use this skill to identify relevant communities, craft appropriate posts, and drive cross-platform engagement without appearing spammy.
Also in 5 projects that use this
- +7 more from lilangMax
- +1 more from nicepkg
Other versions192 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 192
- ruvnet/claude-flow★ 80ksame name
- ruvnet/ruflo★ 79ksame name
- PostHog/posthog★ 40ksame name
- Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios★ 27ksame name
- cloudflare/security-audit-skill★ 18ksame name
- rommapp/romm★ 14ksame name
- kubeshark/kubeshark★ 12ksame name
- maximhq/bifrost★ 9.4ksame name
- mono/SkiaSharp★ 5.6ksame name
- MaxMiksa/Auto-Company★ 3.2ksame name
182 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository5 other files it gives its agents.
- api-mockSkill
- changelog-genSkill
- db-migrateSkill
- i18n-translateSkill
- license-checkSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 173 edited versions we read keep these.
2
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 21
Ask the user (or infer) the scope:
- Distinctive: line 44
Search for committed secrets using these patterns:
- Very specific: line 76
When the user wants a code review (use code-review instead)
- Very specific: line 77
When the user wants a license scan (use license-check)
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 173 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Security Audit Skill
You are performing a security audit. Output a structured report — not just prose.
Step 1 — Define the scope
Ask the user (or infer) the scope:
- Diff — current uncommitted changes (default if there are uncommitted changes)
- Branch —
git diff main...HEAD - Repo — full working tree
- Path — a specific directory or file
Step 2 — Run the audit
Walk through the OWASP Top 10 (2021) categories systematically:
- A01 Broken Access Control — missing authz checks, IDOR, path traversal
- A02 Cryptographic Failures — weak hashing (MD5, SHA1), hardcoded keys, missing TLS
- A03 Injection — SQL, NoSQL, OS command, LDAP, XSS — search for unparameterized string interpolation in queries, untrusted input in
exec/eval - A04 Insecure Design — race conditions in critical flows (payments, account changes)
- A05 Security Misconfiguration — debug=true in prod, default creds, exposed admin panels, permissive CORS
- A06 Vulnerable Components — outdated deps with known CVEs (cross-reference package.json/requirements.txt/go.mod)
- A07 Identification & Authentication Failures — weak password policy, missing rate-limit on login, JWT with
alg=none, sessions without timeout - A08 Software & Data Integrity Failures — unsigned updates, insecure deserialization (pickle, YAML.load, Java ObjectInputStream)
- A09 Logging & Monitoring Failures — sensitive data in logs, missing audit trails
- A10 SSRF — unvalidated URL fetches that could hit internal services (169.254.169.254, localhost)
Step 3 — Look for secrets
Search for committed secrets using these patterns:
aws_secret,AKIA[0-9A-Z]{16},ghp_[A-Za-z0-9]{36},sk-[A-Za-z0-9]{32,}password\s*=\s*['"],api[_-]?key\s*=\s*['"].env,.pem,.keyfiles that should be gitignored
Step 4 — Output the report
SECURITY AUDIT REPORT
─────────────────────
Scope: <scope>
Files: <N files scanned>
🔴 CRITICAL (N)
- <file:line> — <issue> — <fix>
🟠 HIGH (N)
- <file:line> — <issue> — <fix>
🟡 MEDIUM (N)
- <file:line> — <issue> — <fix>
🟢 LOW (N)
- <file:line> — <issue> — <fix>
✓ PASSED CHECKS
- <category>: cleanWhen NOT to use
- Repos with no source code (docs-only)
- When the user wants a code review (use
code-reviewinstead) - When the user wants a license scan (use
license-check)
Failure modes
- ⚠️ A clean report doesn't mean the code is secure — it means these checks passed.
- ⚠️ Always recommend a real third-party scanner (Semgrep, Snyk, Trivy) for production releases.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

