quest
Skill1 starsChanged 51 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Have the AI triage, create, or update a GitHub issue before implementation starts. Use when the user says quest, asks to file a bug, create an issue, triage a report, or update an issue's status, labels, or body.
4 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- opum-ai/proof-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- egregore-labs/egregoretheir own version, first seen Nov 6, 2026
- bmaltais/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- Wondermonger-daydreaming/claude-skills-librarytheir own version, first seen May 30, 2026
Other versions4 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 4
- egregore-labs/egregore★ 293same name
- opum-ai/proof-skills★ 27same name
- Wondermonger-daydreaming/claude-skills-library★ 7same name
- bmaltais/skills★ 2same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
27 rules. 0 are common, 14 are distinctive, and 13 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.
14
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
13
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 8
Use this skill when the user asks the AI to turn a report into a tracked issue, or triage/update one that already exists — the lifecycle …
- Distinctive: line 31
Search existing issues before creating a new one.
- Distinctive: line 34
Create, update, or comment on the issue only with the user's current-turn go-ahead.
- Distinctive: line 41
Not an implementation or design workflow — it tracks the work, it doesn't plan or build it.
- Distinctive: line 43
Not permission to close, reopen, or relabel an issue from an inferred connection to other work.
- Distinctive: line 45
Not a way to auto-file an issue for every complaint or aside in conversation — only when the user asks to track it.
- Distinctive: line 50
Run when the user explicitly asks to quest, file or create an issue, comment on an issue, triage a bug report, or update an issue's title, …
- Distinctive: line 55
If the user asks to search or look up related issues without asking to create or update one, do that read-only and stop there.
- Very specific: line 69
Call get_me (or gh api user as a fallback) to confirm the connected GitHub identity and its access before drafting anything meant to be …
- Very specific: line 71
Search existing issues (search_issues for a conceptual/paraphrased query, list_issues for a direct filter) for likely duplicates before …
- Very specific: line 75
Before setting type or any custom field on issue_write, check list_issue_types and list_issue_fields for the repository and only use values …
- Very specific: line 79
Read any repository issue template (.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/) and follow its required fields first, falling back to context/formats/issue.md …
- Very specific: line 91
Use issue_write method update for title/body/labels/state/type/field changes.
- Very specific: line 100
Use only after the GitHub MCP connector has been tried and is unavailable or blocked, per context/policies/writing-guidelines.md's …
- Very specific: line 103
Never build these commands as one interpolated shell string.
- Very specific: line 113
Create: gh issue create --repo <owner>/<repo> --title '<title>' --body-file <path> --label "<label>" (repeat --label for each label).
- Very specific: line 115
Update title, body, or labels: gh issue edit <number> --repo <owner>/<repo> --title '<title>' --body-file <path> --add-label "<label>" …
- Very specific: line 144
Never create, update, comment on, close, or reopen an issue without the user's current-turn go-ahead per …
- Very specific: line 146
Never touch branches, commits, or pull requests as part of this skill — that's ship's job.
- Distinctive: line 148
Never close or reopen an issue from an inferred connection to other work.
- Distinctive: line 150
Never invent a label, issue type, or custom field value the repository doesn't already define.
- Distinctive: line 155
Stop if the user's message describes a problem but doesn't ask to track it — ask whether they want it filed instead of assuming.
- Very specific: line 157
Stop if the GitHub MCP connector and gh are both unavailable — report the drafted issue content in chat instead.
- Distinctive: line 159
Stop if the connected account lacks issue write access — report this as a permissions issue, not as the connector being down, and share the …
- Distinctive: line 162
Stop if a likely duplicate exists and the user hasn't said whether to file anyway or comment on the existing one instead.
- Distinctive: line 174
If a likely duplicate was found, report it even when the user chose to file anyway.
- Distinctive: line 176
If questing stops or fails, skip the phrase and state the blocker plainly.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Quest Workflow
Use this skill when the user asks the AI to turn a report into a tracked
issue, or triage/update one that already exists — the lifecycle stage before
ship.
Contents
- At A Glance
- What This Is Not
- Trigger Rules
- Requirements
- Prerequisites
- Default Path
- gh Fallback
- Naming And Text
- Guardrails
- Stop Conditions
- Handoff
- Response Examples
At A Glance
- Decide the intent: file a new issue, triage/search for duplicates, or update one that already exists.
- Search existing issues before creating a new one.
- Draft the title, body, labels, and type from the actual report, code, or git history, not a guess.
- Create, update, or comment on the issue only with the user's current-turn go-ahead.
- Report the issue number/URL and what changed.
What This Is Not
- Not
ship: never touches branches, commits, or pull requests. - Not an implementation or design workflow — it tracks the work, it doesn't plan or build it.
- Not permission to close, reopen, or relabel an issue from an inferred connection to other work; only act on what the user explicitly confirms.
- Not a way to auto-file an issue for every complaint or aside in conversation — only when the user asks to track it.
Trigger Rules
- Run when the user explicitly asks to quest, file or create an issue, comment on an issue, triage a bug report, or update an issue's title, body, labels, state, type, or custom fields.
- A bug report or complaint on its own is not a request to track it — ask before creating anything if the user hasn't said to file it.
- If the user asks to search or look up related issues without asking to create or update one, do that read-only and stop there.
Requirements
- A GitHub MCP connector configured for this session, authenticated as an account with issue write access to the repository, for any create, update, or comment action. Without write access, a draft can still be produced but never posted. A search/triage-only pass needs nothing beyond read access.
ghinstalled and authenticated as a fallback path, for when the MCP connector is unavailable mid-session.
Prerequisites
- Call
get_me(orgh api useras a fallback) to confirm the connected GitHub identity and its access before drafting anything meant to be posted. - Search existing issues (
search_issuesfor a conceptual/paraphrased query,list_issuesfor a direct filter) for likely duplicates before drafting a new one. If a strong match exists, surface it and ask whether to comment on the existing issue instead of opening a new one. - Before setting
typeor any custom field onissue_write, checklist_issue_typesandlist_issue_fieldsfor the repository and only use values it actually supports; omittype/issue_fieldsentirely if the repository doesn't have them. - Read any repository issue template (
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/) and follow its required fields first, falling back tocontext/formats/issue.mdwhen the repo has none, then to a plain title/body if that format is absent.
Default Path
- Determine intent: create, update, or triage/search only.
- To create: search for duplicates first (see Prerequisites). Draft a
title, body, and labels grounded in the actual report, code, or git
history. Use
issue_writemethodcreate. - To update: fetch the current issue with
issue_readmethodgetfirst, so edits apply to its real current state instead of a stale assumption. Useissue_writemethodupdatefor title/body/labels/state/type/field changes. - To comment: use
add_issue_comment. - Confirm the write call actually returned an issue number, URL, or comment id before declaring success — a call that didn't error is not proof it posted.
gh Fallback
Use only after the GitHub MCP connector has been tried and is unavailable or
blocked, per context/policies/writing-guidelines.md's MCP-first rule.
- Never build these commands as one interpolated shell string. Pass each
flag and value as its own literal argument (an argv list) — backticks or
$(...)inside report-derived text only run as shell commands when that text gets concatenated into a larger quoted string, not when it's passed as a standalone argument. Write body and comment text to a temp file first and pass it with--body-file <path>, sinceghhas no--title-fileequivalent for the title. If only a single shell string is available, single-quote the title and escape embedded single quotes ('→'\'') rather than double-quoting it, since$(...)and backticks aren't special inside single quotes. - Create:
gh issue create --repo <owner>/<repo> --title '<title>' --body-file <path> --label "<label>"(repeat--labelfor each label). - Update title, body, or labels:
gh issue edit <number> --repo <owner>/<repo> --title '<title>' --body-file <path> --add-label "<label>" --remove-label "<label>". - Close or reopen:
gh issue close <number> --repo <owner>/<repo>orgh issue reopen <number> --repo <owner>/<repo>. - Comment:
gh issue comment <number> --repo <owner>/<repo> --body-file <path>. ghhas no equivalent for issuetypeor custom project fields — those are GraphQL-only. If the MCP connector is down and either is required to fulfill the request, say so and stop instead of silently dropping the field.- Confirm success the same way as the MCP path (step 5 above): read back
what
ghjust returned before declaring success.
Naming And Text
- Issue title: concise and technical, following the tone rules in
context/policies/writing-guidelines.md(no marketing language, no vague words like "stuff" or "things"). - Issue body: describe the actual problem or request with enough detail for someone else to act on it — reproduction steps for a bug, or the concrete outcome for a feature ask. Do not invent acceptance criteria, screenshots, or scope the user didn't give.
- Labels, type, and fields: only apply values that already exist in the repository's own label/type/field list; never invent one the repo doesn't have.
Guardrails
- Never create, update, comment on, close, or reopen an issue without the
user's current-turn go-ahead per
context/policies/approval-policy.md. - Never touch branches, commits, or pull requests as part of this skill —
that's
ship's job. - Never close or reopen an issue from an inferred connection to other work; only act on what the user explicitly confirms.
- Never invent a label, issue type, or custom field value the repository doesn't already define.
Stop Conditions
- Stop if the user's message describes a problem but doesn't ask to track it — ask whether they want it filed instead of assuming.
- Stop if the GitHub MCP connector and
ghare both unavailable — report the drafted issue content in chat instead. - Stop if the connected account lacks issue write access — report this as a permissions issue, not as the connector being down, and share the draft in chat.
- Stop if a likely duplicate exists and the user hasn't said whether to file anyway or comment on the existing one instead.
Handoff
- Unless the user asked for plain output, open with a fresh one-line success
phrase in the orc voice, speaking as the Quest-Giver from
context/personality.md(the target repo's copy when it exists, otherwise${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/context/personality.md). If they did, open with the plain result instead. - Report the issue number/URL and what changed (created, which fields were updated, or that a comment was posted).
- If a likely duplicate was found, report it even when the user chose to file anyway.
- If questing stops or fails, skip the phrase and state the blocker plainly.
Response Examples
Opening lines are samples of the orc voice; write a fresh one each time.
New issue filed:
📌 Hrrm. Quest posted: issue #45 marks the crash for the raiding party. ✨
Issue: https://github.com/example/repo/issues/45
Title: fix: null token crashes login on refresh
Labels: bugExisting issue updated:
📌 The board's been redrawn. Issue #40 now reads true.
Issue: https://github.com/example/repo/issues/40
Changed: labels (added `priority-high`), body (added repro steps).Duplicate found, filed anyway:
📌 Hrrm. A cousin quest already stands on the board.
Issue #38 looks like the same crash. Filed #46 anyway, per your call — worth
linking or closing one as a duplicate of the other later.Blocked quest:
⚠️ Quest is blocked: the connected account has no issue write access on this repo.
No issue was created. Draft:
Title: fix: null token crashes login on refresh
Body: <drafted body>Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

