agentleFS
karlomikuskarlomikus/bar-assistant/.agents/skills/clean-ddd-hexagonal/SKILL.md

clean-ddd-hexagonal

Skill1.1k starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub

Proactively apply when designing APIs, microservices, or scalable backend structure. Triggers on DDD, Clean Architecture, Hexagonal, ports and adapters, entities, value objects, domain events, CQRS, event sourcing, repository pattern, use cases, onion architecture, outbox pattern, aggregate root, anti-corruption layer. Use when working with domain models, aggregates, repositories, or bounded contexts. Clean Architecture + DDD + Hexagonal patterns for backend services, language-agnostic (Go, Rust, Python, TypeScript, Java, C#).

3 other projects use a version of this.

Trending

Quiet since August.about the whole repository

Dec 2025: 0 mentionsJan 2026: 0 mentionsFeb 2026: 2 mentionsMar 2026: 0 mentionsApr 2026: 2 mentionsMay 2026: 0 mentionsJun 2026: 0 mentionsJul 2026: 0 mentionsAug 2026: 1 mentionSep 2026: 0 mentionsOct 2026: 0 mentionsNov 2026: 0 mentions
Dec 2025Jun 2026Nov 2026
Mentions a month of the karlomikus/bar-assistant repository that our weekly crawl found. There is no adoption data for this file yet.

Most recently taken up by

Who's talking about karlomikus/bar-assistant

The biggest 5 of 18 mentions linking to the repository that our crawl found. Each line is their own headline.

See all 18

Talked about on GitHub (18 times).

On GitHub · 18

13 more on GitHub
  • Other versions3 projects use a version of this.

    Word for word · 2

    1. SamuelAlev/control-center★ 8100% same
    2. cmnemoi/skills★ 0100% same

    Edited · 0

    None found.

    Wrote their own version · 1

    1. ccheney/robust-skills★ 60same name

    How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.

  • In this repository3 other files it gives its agents.

The file

Files
SKILL.md

Clean Architecture + DDD + Hexagonal

Backend architecture combining DDD tactical patterns, Clean Architecture dependency rules, and Hexagonal ports/adapters for maintainable, testable systems.

When to Use (and When NOT to)

Use WhenSkip When
Complex business domain with many rulesSimple CRUD, few business rules
Long-lived system (years of maintenance)Prototype, MVP, throwaway code
Team of 5+ developersSolo developer or small team (1-2)
Multiple entry points (API, CLI, events)Single entry point, simple API
Need to swap infrastructure (DB, broker)Fixed infrastructure, unlikely to change
High test coverage requiredQuick scripts, internal tools

Start simple. Evolve complexity only when needed. Most systems don't need full CQRS or Event Sourcing.

CRITICAL: The Dependency Rule

Dependencies point inward only. Outer layers depend on inner layers, never the reverse.

Infrastructure → Application → Domain
   (adapters)     (use cases)    (core)

Violations to catch:

  • Domain importing database/HTTP libraries
  • Controllers calling repositories directly (bypassing use cases)
  • Entities depending on application services

Design validation: "Create your application to work without either a UI or a database" — Alistair Cockburn. If you can run your domain logic from tests with no infrastructure, your boundaries are correct.

Quick Decision Trees

"Where does this code go?"

Where does it go?
├─ Pure business logic, no I/O           → domain/
├─ Orchestrates domain + has side effects → application/
├─ Talks to external systems              → infrastructure/
├─ Defines HOW to interact (interface)    → port (domain or application)
└─ Implements a port                      → adapter (infrastructure)

"Is this an Entity or Value Object?"

Entity or Value Object?
├─ Has unique identity that persists → Entity
├─ Defined only by its attributes    → Value Object
├─ "Is this THE same thing?"         → Entity (identity comparison)
└─ "Does this have the same value?"  → Value Object (structural equality)

"Should this be its own Aggregate?"

Aggregate boundaries?
├─ Must be consistent together in a transaction → Same aggregate
├─ Can be eventually consistent                 → Separate aggregates
├─ Referenced by ID only                        → Separate aggregates
└─ >10 entities in aggregate                    → Split it

Rule: One aggregate per transaction. Cross-aggregate consistency via domain events (eventual consistency).

Directory Structure

src/
├── domain/                    # Core business logic (NO external dependencies)
│   ├── {aggregate}/
│   │   ├── entity              # Aggregate root + child entities
│   │   ├── value_objects       # Immutable value types
│   │   ├── events              # Domain events
│   │   ├── repository          # Repository interface (DRIVEN PORT)
│   │   └── services            # Domain services (stateless logic)
│   └── shared/
│       └── errors              # Domain errors
├── application/               # Use cases / Application services
│   ├── {use-case}/
│   │   ├── command             # Command/Query DTOs
│   │   ├── handler             # Use case implementation
│   │   └── port                # Driver port interface
│   └── shared/
│       └── unit_of_work        # Transaction abstraction
├── infrastructure/            # Adapters (external concerns)
│   ├── persistence/           # Database adapters
│   ├── messaging/             # Message broker adapters
│   ├── http/                  # REST/GraphQL adapters (DRIVER)
│   └── config/
│       └── di                  # Dependency injection / composition root
└── main                        # Bootstrap / entry point

DDD Building Blocks

PatternPurposeLayerKey Rule
EntityIdentity + behaviorDomainEquality by ID
Value ObjectImmutable dataDomainEquality by value, no setters
AggregateConsistency boundaryDomainOnly root is referenced externally
Domain EventRecord of changeDomainPast tense naming (OrderPlaced)
RepositoryPersistence abstractionDomain (port)Per aggregate, not per table
Domain ServiceStateless logicDomainWhen logic doesn't fit an entity
Application ServiceOrchestrationApplicationCoordinates domain + infra

Anti-Patterns (CRITICAL)

Anti-PatternProblemFix
Anemic Domain ModelEntities are data bags, logic in servicesMove behavior INTO entities
Repository per EntityBreaks aggregate boundariesOne repository per AGGREGATE
Leaking InfrastructureDomain imports DB/HTTP libsDomain has ZERO external deps
God AggregateToo many entities, slow transactionsSplit into smaller aggregates
Skipping PortsControllers → Repositories directlyAlways go through application layer
CRUD ThinkingModeling data, not behaviorModel business operations
Premature CQRSAdding complexity before neededStart with simple read/write, evolve
Cross-Aggregate TXMultiple aggregates in one transactionUse domain events for consistency

Implementation Order

  1. Discover the Domain — Event Storming, conversations with domain experts
  2. Model the Domain — Entities, value objects, aggregates (no infra)
  3. Define Ports — Repository interfaces, external service interfaces
  4. Implement Use Cases — Application services coordinating domain
  5. Add Adapters last — HTTP, database, messaging implementations

DDD is collaborative. Modeling sessions with domain experts are as important as the code patterns.

Reference Documentation

FilePurpose
references/LAYERS.mdComplete layer specifications
references/DDD-STRATEGIC.mdBounded contexts, context mapping
references/DDD-TACTICAL.mdEntities, value objects, aggregates (pseudocode)
references/HEXAGONAL.mdPorts, adapters, naming
references/CQRS-EVENTS.mdCommand/query separation, events
references/TESTING.mdUnit, integration, architecture tests
references/CHEATSHEET.mdQuick decision guide

Sources

Primary Sources

Pattern References

Implementation Guides

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.