ops
Skill0 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
CI/CD pipelines, GitHub Actions workflows, Docker configurations, deployment automation, and release management patterns. Use when building CI/CD, writing GitHub Actions, creating Docker configs, automating deployments, managing releases, or setting up infrastructure-as-code. DO NOT USE FOR: writing application-specific business logic (use implementer), designing high-level system architecture or topology (use architect), performing security audits (use guardian), or orchestrating data pipelines like Airflow DAGs (use data-engineering).
17 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- holon-run/holontheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- guaardvark/guaardvarktheir own version, first seen Nov 5, 2026
- jthingelstad/elixir-mcptheir own version, first seen Nov 4, 2026
- tandregbg/core-claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 4, 2026
- aya-taleb/biz-ready-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- vivekschaudhary/compasstheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use status, design and 3 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
AnthropicSkillstatus
Case status summary by audience — client-facing (plain language), internal (for the professor), or court-ready (formal caption format per local rules). Same facts, different framing and depth. Use when a student needs to update the client, brief the professor, or prepare a court status report.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Microsoft AzureSkilldesign
Design rules and conventions for the API Center Portal. Use when editing detail pages, card components, badges, layout, navigation, sidebars, or headers. Covers badge styling, metadata placement, page navigation patterns, and layout alignment.
Also in 3 projects that use this
BlockSkillplan
Draft a TDD, PRD, or lightweight plan in the conversation without committing it.
Also in 3 projects that use this
SentrySkillreview
Fixture review skill.
Also in 3 projects that use this
VercelSkillsetup
Set up Vercel CLI and project configuration. Use when the user says "set up Vercel", "configure Vercel", "link to Vercel", or "vercel init".
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions17 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 17
- guaardvark/guaardvark★ 306same name
- holon-run/holon★ 194same name
- drafthq/draft★ 40same name
- tandregbg/core-claude-skills★ 4same name
- vivekschaudhary/compass★ 2same name
- vlting/claude-skills★ 2same name
- aya-taleb/biz-ready-skills★ 1same name
- Frutzmann/claude-code-setup★ 1same name
- harshsinghmp/muse-skills★ 1same name
- HDHNezherParking-cum-Y638-Intl-Ltd/titan★ 1same name
7 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository29 other files it gives its agents.
- architectSkill
- brainstormingSkill
- concise-planningSkill
- context-engineerSkill
- data-analystSkill
- data-deprecation-analysisSkill
- data-engineeringSkill
- analystSkill
- detectiveSkill
- editorSkill
- inspectorSkill
- data-narrativeSkill
- data-scienceSkill
- excalidraw-diagramSkill
- genai-securitySkill
- guardianSkill
- holdout-validationSkill
- implementerSkill
- llm-app-patternsSkill
- llm-memSkill
- prompt-librarySkill
- security-boundariesSkill
- story-masterSkill
- story-plannerSkill
- subagent-executionSkill
- systematic-debuggingSkill
- task-routingSkill
- thinkerSkill
- verification-before-completionSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
8 rules. 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 14 edited versions we read keep these.
8
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 21
Immutable artifacts: every build produces a versioned, unchangeable artifact
- Distinctive: line 23
Secrets in vaults: never in code, config, or CI logs
- Distinctive: line 24
Rollback before deploy: document rollback plan BEFORE deployment
- Distinctive: line 33
Action: write a mechanical check (pre-commit hook, lint rule, or CI job)
- Distinctive: line 93
Does NOT write application business logic (pipelines and automation only)
- Distinctive: line 94
Does NOT manage secrets directly (provides vault integration patterns)
- Distinctive: line 95
Does NOT perform security audits (consult guardian)
- Distinctive: line 96
Does NOT design system architecture (consult architect)
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 14 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Ops Skill - CI/CD, Deployment & Automation
Version: 9.0 | Updated: 01-July-2026 | Architect: Karim Bhalwani | Tiered: core (~140 lines) + on-demand references
Unified reference for operational automation. For copy-ready templates (GitHub Actions, Docker, Terraform, release checklists), load the deep-dive reference.
Core Principles
- Immutable artifacts: every build produces a versioned, unchangeable artifact
- Environment parity: dev/staging/prod from same templates
- Secrets in vaults: never in code, config, or CI logs
- Rollback before deploy: document rollback plan BEFORE deployment
Mechanical Enforcement
When a behavioral rule fails twice in retrospectives, promote it to a mechanical check. Linters and CI are more reliable than prompt instructions.
Promote-to-Code Decision Rule
- Trigger: behavioral rule caused rework 2+ times
- Action: write a mechanical check (pre-commit hook, lint rule, or CI job)
- Record: log in
.copilot/context/DECISIONS.mdas an ADR - Remove redundancy: move the original prompt instruction verbatim into
.copilot/context/DECISIONS.mdunder the relevant ADR entry, then delete it from the prompt.
Enforcement Layers
| Layer | Catches | Speed | Scope |
| Pre-commit hooks | Style, structure, obvious violations | Seconds | Per-commit |
| CI workflow | Cross-file issues, Bible freshness, doc staleness | Minutes | Per-PR |
| Guardian review | Design quality, logic correctness, architectural fit | Minutes | Per-PR |
Load mechanical-enforcement.md for copy-ready pre-commit, ruff, and CI config templates.
Quick Reference: Key Patterns
GitHub Actions
- Standard CI: lint > test > security scan (parallel where possible)
- Reusable workflows via
workflow_callfor DRY deployment - Matrix strategy for cross-version/cross-OS testing
- Cache pip/npm dependencies with
actions/cache@v4
Docker
- Multi-stage builds, pin base image versions, non-root user
.dockerignorefor build context optimization- Health checks for orchestrated deployments
Deployment
- Azure: OIDC via
azure/login@v2, deployment slots for zero-downtime - Databricks: Asset Bundles for pipeline deployment
- Blue-green or canary for stateless services
- Database migrations: forward-only with backward compatibility
Release Management
- Semantic versioning:
MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH - Changelog in Keep a Changelog format
- Release checklist: CI green, changelog updated, version bumped, security scan clean, staging tested, rollback documented, tag pushed
Infrastructure as Code
- Terraform: modules for reuse, remote state backend, environment variables
- Idempotent: running twice produces same result
For full templates and examples of all patterns above, load cicd-patterns-deep-dive.md.
Definition of Done
- CI pipeline runs green (lint, test, security scan)
- Docker image builds and runs with health check passing
- Rollback plan documented before deployment
- Secrets managed via vault/env vars (none in code)
- Release checklist completed
- Mechanical enforcement in place for P1 invariants
Constraints
- Does NOT write application business logic (pipelines and automation only)
- Does NOT manage secrets directly (provides vault integration patterns)
- Does NOT perform security audits (consult guardian)
- Does NOT design system architecture (consult architect)
Common Pitfalls
- Over-complex pipelines: start simple, add stages only when justified
- Missing rollback plan: every deployment needs one
- Secret leakage: never echo secrets in logs
- Flaky tests in CI: quarantine, don't ignore
- Manual steps in "automated" pipelines: if it requires human intervention, it's not automated
Integration Points
- guardian: Reviews CI/CD configurations for security and quality
- release-manager: Consumes pipeline outputs for release decisions
- architect: Provides infrastructure architecture and deployment topology
- data-engineering: Deploys data pipelines via Airflow/Databricks workflows
References
Load on demand for specific sub-tasks. If a referenced file is not available, generate a minimal inline template based on the Quick Reference patterns above and note that the full template should be added to the references directory.
- cicd-patterns-deep-dive.md - Full GitHub Actions templates (CI, reusable workflows, matrix, caching, PR automation), Docker patterns, deployment configs (Databricks, Azure), release management (semver, changelog, checklist), IaC (Terraform). Load when building or modifying pipelines.
- mechanical-enforcement.md - Pre-commit hooks, ruff rules, GitHub Actions enforcement workflows.
Scripts
- check_pipeline_health.py - CI/CD config validator (hard-coded secrets, unpinned images, deprecated runners, missing timeouts).
- lint_agent_legible_errors.py - Linter enforcing agent-legible error messages with remediation hints.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

