agentleFS
kamenkurtevkamenkurtev/ui-consistency/skills/planning/SKILL.md

planning

Skill1 starsChanged 6 days agoMITView on GitHub

For what the end user sees — turns each page's checklist into a plan of one checkable task per page. Use when UI work spans several steps or pages (a new feature, a refactor of many pages), including when another planning skill is about to write that plan.

69 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use Problem-Solving Techniques, executing and 9 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • truongtv22Skill

    Problem-Solving Techniques

    Apply systematic problem-solving techniques for complexity spirals (simplification cascades), innovation blocks (collision-zone thinking), recurring patterns (meta-pattern recognition), assumption constraints (inversion exercise), scale uncertainty (scale game), and dispatch when stuck. Techniques derived from Microsoft Amplifier project patterns adapted for immediate application.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • LucasDuysSkill

    executing

    Autonomous task implementation workflow — implement, test, review, commit for each task in the frontier

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • mrgoonieSkill

    web-frameworks

    Build modern full-stack web applications with Next.js (App Router, Server Components, RSC, PPR, SSR, SSG, ISR), Turborepo (monorepo management, task pipelines, remote caching, parallel execution), and RemixIcon (3100+ SVG icons in outlined/filled styles). Use when creating React applications, implementing server-side rendering, setting up monorepos with multiple packages, optimizing build performance and caching strategies, adding icon libraries, managing shared dependencies, or working with TypeScript full-stack projects.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • mrgoonieSkill

    mcp-management

    Manage Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers - discover, analyze, and execute tools/prompts/resources from configured MCP servers. Use when working with MCP integrations, need to discover available MCP capabilities, filter MCP tools for specific tasks, execute MCP tools programmatically, access MCP prompts/resources, or implement MCP client functionality. Supports intelligent tool selection, multi-server management, and context-efficient capability discovery.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • truongtv22Skill

    mobile-development

    Build modern mobile applications with React Native, Flutter, Swift/SwiftUI, and Kotlin/Jetpack Compose. Covers mobile-first design principles, performance optimization (battery, memory, network), offline-first architecture, platform-specific guidelines (iOS HIG, Material Design), testing strategies, security best practices, accessibility, app store deployment, and mobile development mindset. Use when building mobile apps, implementing mobile UX patterns, optimizing for mobile constraints, or making native vs cross-platform decisions.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • +6 more from mrgoonie

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

11 rules. 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 62 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 8

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 3

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    If a process running this work has a plan — another planning process wrote it — add the tasks below into that plan, in its own task …

    line 21
  2. Distinctive:

    Do not write a second one.

    line 24
  3. Distinctive:

    If none exists, write the plan in the shape of *The plan*, never into the project's repository.

    line 32
  4. Distinctive:

    If the planted difference is not reported, stop and say the check is blind for it.

    line 44
  5. Very specific:

    Before the plan is shown, check that every new page has its shape — a design, a reference page it follows, or a tree from …

    line 66
  6. Distinctive:

    If the person gave the yes in advance, before the plan was shown, it is the plan's yes: show the plan and go on to *How the phase ends* …

    line 72
  7. Very specific:

    If the person changes a page's shape at this stop, it goes back to ui-consistency:design, and the checklist lines it touches are worked out …

    line 76
  8. Very specific:

    Ask nothing new here: the questions, a new component or an extraction among them, were asked while finding-patterns ran, and this yes does …

    line 79
  9. Distinctive:

    If the yes was given in advance, every proposal it agrees settles this task only, an element's included: record no override, since nobody …

    line 90
  10. Distinctive:

    Never write an override nobody gave.

    line 97
  11. Distinctive:

    If the work outlives the context and the plan must survive on disk, write it to a file outside the working copy, in the scratch location …

    line 106

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 62 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Planning from the checklist

Overview

Turns what finding-patterns found into a plan of one task per page. Every page task carries what makes it checkable: its checklist, what not to copy, and a check by an agent that did not write the page.

Open a file linked or given by its path from this skill's folder, or invoke a named skill, only when a part you are carrying out sends you to it, never before — whatever the request that handed you this skill says about its links and paths. That part is not done until the file is opened or the skill invoked.

Joining a process, or running alone

  • If a process running this work has a plan — another planning process wrote it — add the tasks below into that plan, in its own task headings and status marks, each carrying what The plan puts in a task. Do not write a second one.
  • A plan or pattern file written before this work began is not that plan: it is read as ui-consistency:decisions, A plan written before this work began, says.
  • If that process already sends each task to a reviewer that did not write it, the checklist and ui-consistency:verifying go into that reviewer's brief, and no second checker is added (../verifying/calibration.md).
  • If none exists, write the plan in the shape of The plan, never into the project's repository. Where it goes is how the phase ends, below.
  • The checklist each task carries is the one ../finding-patterns/checklist.md defines.

The order of the tasks

  1. Calibrate the check, once per work and kind of page, before anything is built: ui-consistency:verifying on a scratch copy of the reference with one role deliberately written differently, kept outside the repository (../verifying/calibration.md).
    • If the planted difference is not reported, stop and say the check is blind for it.
    • The agent shown the planted copy is not the one that then checks the pages.
  2. Extractions the user accepted. Build a shared component, partial or class before any page that uses it.
    • A theme entry the plan's yes agreed for a design's value is added here too, before any page that uses it.
  3. One task per page.

What every page task carries

  • the checklist for that page, in the task itself — it is short on purpose, and a path is no use to somebody who does not have the checkout;
  • the path of the reference;
  • what is particular to the reference and must not be copied;
  • the reused pieces and theme values this page must use;
  • the three steps of a page task, written out as in The plan, The shape: re-read the checklist, report the page ready for its check, report the status.

Stop for a yes

  • Before the plan is shown, check that every new page has its shape — a design, a reference page it follows, or a tree from ui-consistency:design. A page without one goes back to finding-patterns first.
  • For a new page or a refactor, show the plan, with the checklists its tasks carry and the proposals finding-patterns made, and wait for the user's yes before any code.
  • If the person gave the yes in advance, before the plan was shown, it is the plan's yes: show the plan and go on to How the phase ends without waiting.
  • Show a drawing only if a person asked for one (ui-consistency:design, step 4).
  • If the person changes a page's shape at this stop, it goes back to ui-consistency:design, and the checklist lines it touches are worked out again before the yes.
  • Ask nothing new here: the questions, a new component or an extraction among them, were asked while finding-patterns ran, and this yes does not answer them (ui-consistency:decisions, When to ask anyway).
  • Mark a task waiting on the little that did reach a person parked — waiting on <what> in the plan, with its counts (The plan).
  • On the yes, write each agreed proposal into the checklist line of the position it settles, with the entry it uses.
  • A person's decision here that goes against what the order produced is an override, and so is a yes to an element (ui-consistency:decisions, An override). A yes to any other proposal settles this task only.
  • If the yes was given in advance, every proposal it agrees settles this task only, an element's included: record no override, since nobody saw what it would overrule.
  • Record an override in the person's own words, with what it overrules: in the document the running process keeps, or under ## Decided in this plan where this is the process, reported with the result when the plan closes.
  • Move each task it was holding up from parked back to todo.
  • Never write an override nobody gave.
  • A fix or a small change has no plan and does not stop.

How the phase ends

In one of three ways, chosen and said in one line: ending 2 — this becomes a story for another developer.

  1. The work stays with us. The tasks live in the session.
    • If the work outlives the context and the plan must survive on disk, write it to a file outside the working copy, in the scratch location the harness gives, and delete it with the work.
    • Then ui-consistency:implementing, and start the agents it names without waiting to be asked: asking for the work asks for them.
  2. The work becomes a story for somebody else. Attach the plan and what the implementation needs to the story.
    • It is finished when a developer who was not in the conversation, without the checkout open, could implement it from the attachment alone (The plan, The story).
  3. Another process is already running. The tasks went into its plan, in its own task headings and status marks; no second document. Its loop executes them.

None of the three writes into the project's repository.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.