improve-arch
Skill1 starsChanged 5 months agoLicence not identifiedView on GitHub
Surfaces architectural friction in a codebase and proposes deepening refactors (move complexity behind a smaller interface), named in the project's own domain vocabulary, then grills each candidate before committing. Use when a solo dev asks 重构架构/这块太乱了/降低耦合/哪里该重构/improve architecture about structure, coupling, or scattered logic. Not for tracing a specific bug (use hunt) or reviewing a finished diff (use check).
4 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- timurgaleev/vibestacktheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- eyeix/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- evist0/okf-matt-skillstheir own version, first seen Jul 7, 2026
- wachawo/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen May 5, 2026
Other versions4 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 4
- evist0/okf-matt-skills★ 13same name
- timurgaleev/vibestack★ 8same name
- eyeix/skills★ 1same name
- wachawo/claude-skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository27 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- checkSkill
- decision-logSkill
- designSkill
- distributionSkill
- documentSkill
- get-paidSkill
- handoffSkill
- healthSkill
- huntSkill
- learnSkill
- migrateSkill
- observeSkill
- office-hoursSkill
- plan-reviewSkill
- prototypeSkill
- qaSkill
- readSkill
- retroSkill
- scope-guardSkill
- seoSkill
- ship-smallSkill
- tddSkill
- thinkSkill
- writeSkill
- zoom-outSkill
The file
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.