agentleFS
kaeawckaeawc/auto-mobile/skills/github-cli/SKILL.md

github-cli

Skill56 starsChanged 34 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Helper skill for GitHub operations in this repo; use it when another workflow needs gh for PRs, issues, review threads, checks, Actions runs, or job logs — including logs from a job that is still running.

25 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use terraform, codex-cli and 3 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • ihiteshguptaSkill

    terraform

    Expert in Infrastructure as Code with Terraform. Use for creating, managing, and versioning infrastructure across cloud providers.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • garri333Skill

    codex-cli

    OpenAI Codex CLI mastery skill for installation, authentication, terminal commands, code generation from natural language, file editing, project scaffolding, and IDE integrations. Covers GPT-5.2 Instant/Thinking tiers and shell/container execution modes.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • PostHogSkill

    karpathy-guidelines

    Behavioral guidelines to reduce common LLM coding mistakes. Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring code to avoid overcomplication, make surgical changes, surface assumptions, and define verifiable success criteria. Based on https://github.com/multica-ai/andrej-karpathy-skills.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • MicrosoftSkill

    caveman

    Ultra-compressed response style that reduces output token count while preserving technical accuracy, with intensity levels and auto-clarity safety rules

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • BlockSkill

    frontend-design

    Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality. Use this skill when the user asks to build web components, pages, or applications. Generates creative, polished code that avoids generic AI aesthetics.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 19 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 3

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Prefer gh pr view|list|create|edit and gh issue list|view.

    line 11
  2. Very specific:

    Write long output to scratch/ and summarize.

    line 14
  3. Distinctive:

    No single endpoint returns all PR feedback.

    line 19
  4. Distinctive:

    Only resolve on a PR we authored and are actively working, once the finding is genuinely handled — fixed in a pushed commit, or verified …

    line 79
  5. Distinctive:

    Every red result is PR-caused, pre-existing on main, transient/infrastructure, or

    line 179

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 19 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

GitHub CLI Usage

Shared dependency for check-ci, github-pr-feedback, auto-mobile-code-review, pr-analysis, push-pr, and push-my-prs.

  • Prefer gh pr view|list|create|edit and gh issue list|view.
  • Reach for gh api/GraphQL only where the subcommands fall short — review-thread resolution state and live job logs are the two cases that matter here.
  • Write long output to scratch/ and summarize. Job logs run 100KB+; never let one into the conversation whole.

PR feedback: four separate surfaces

No single endpoint returns all PR feedback. Collect all four, paginated, or miss whole categories:

gh api --paginate "repos/kaeawc/auto-mobile/issues/<PR>/comments?per_page=100"  # conversation
gh api --paginate "repos/kaeawc/auto-mobile/pulls/<PR>/reviews?per_page=100"    # review verdicts
gh api --paginate "repos/kaeawc/auto-mobile/pulls/<PR>/comments?per_page=100"   # inline (no resolution state)
# review threads — the only source of resolution state — below

These three return top-level JSON arrays, and --paginate merges the pages into one flat array, so redirecting to a file and parsing it with jq is safe. Verified on gh 2.96 against PR #4117 with per_page=2: five GET requests, one top-level document, element count matching the unpaginated result. (The gh api manual describes pages as separate documents — true for GraphQL and for object-shaped responses, but not for these array endpoints on this version. If you are on an older gh, re-check before relying on it.) Do not add --slurp here: on an array endpoint it produces an array of pages ([[…],[…]]), and it is rejected outright when combined with --jq (the --slurp option is not supported with --jq or --template). GraphQL is the opposite case — see below.

Scope everything to the PR's headRefOid; after any push, re-collect from the new head. For the triage workflow — ledger, dispositions, resolution conditions — use github-pr-feedback. This is just the mechanics.

Review threads: resolution state

GET /pulls/{n}/comments and gh pr view --json comments return bodies but not whether a thread is resolved; that lives only in GraphQL. Collect threads through the tested helper:

scripts/ci/pr-review-threads.sh <PR> --unresolved-only

It paginates review threads, emits one clean JSON array, and fails closed rather than returning a partial feedback ledger. Do not replace it with a saved gh api graphql --paginate response: GraphQL emits one JSON document per page, unlike the REST array endpoints above.

--paginate advances the outer reviewThreads connection only. The nested comments(first:20) is a separate connection: a thread with more replies than that silently truncates, and the later replies are exactly where a rebuttal or fix-evidence lives. For a thread you are about to resolve on the strength of its discussion, read the full comment list from REST instead, which paginates properly:

gh api --paginate "repos/kaeawc/auto-mobile/pulls/<PR>/comments?per_page=100" \
  --jq '.[] | select(.in_reply_to_id == <root_comment_id> or .id == <root_comment_id>)
        | "\(.user.login): \(.body)"'

isOutdated means the anchored line changed, not that the finding was addressed — judge outdated threads on content.

Resolving needs only the thread's PRRT_… id:

gh api graphql -f query='
mutation($id:ID!){ resolveReviewThread(input:{threadId:$id}){ thread{ isResolved } } }' \
  -F id=<PRRT_…>

Only resolve on a PR we authored and are actively working, once the finding is genuinely handled — fixed in a pushed commit, or verified and declined. Both count: resolving claims the thread is dealt with, not that the reviewer was right. Leave it open only when you could not determine whether the finding is real. Replying instead takes the comment id, not the thread id:

gh api repos/kaeawc/auto-mobile/pulls/<PR>/comments/<comment_id>/replies -f body='…'

Bot findings

chatgpt-codex-connector[bot] encodes severity as a body badge (P1 Badge/P2 Badge/P3 Badge):

gh api repos/kaeawc/auto-mobile/pulls/<PR>/comments --paginate \
  --jq '.[] | select(.user.login|test("codex"))
        | {id, path, line, sev: (.body|capture("P(?<n>[123]) Badge").n), body: .body[0:400]}'

P1 claims to block. Codex is usually right about mechanism and sometimes wrong about reachability — verify before acting and equally before dismissing, and keep those two judgements apart: a false mechanism often arrives attached to a good suggestion, so evaluate the proposed change on its own reasoning before rejecting it. Refuting also carries the higher burden than accepting, since a wrong rejection leaves a live bug. When you do decline, report the reason in-session and resolve the thread; do not post a reply. github-pr-feedback and auto-mobile-code-review both forbid posting, and a decline is not an exception.

Checks

gh pr checks <PR> --json name,state,bucket,link

Branch on bucket: pass, fail, pending, skipping, cancel. Only fail is a failure. A cancelled check on the head SHA is usually a superseded run from a rapid push, but it can still wedge the green-main ruleset — re-run it rather than debugging code.

Cross-check the head SHA's check-runs, where duplicates surface:

# filter defaults to `latest`, which hides exactly the stale duplicate you are looking for.
gh api --paginate "repos/kaeawc/auto-mobile/commits/<HEAD_SHA>/check-runs?per_page=100&filter=all" \
  --jq '.check_runs[] | "\(.name)\t\(.status)\t\(.conclusion // "-")\t\(.completed_at)"' | sort

The same name twice with different conclusions — a cancelled older run beside a successful newer one — is what parks automerge; take the newest. An empty legacy combined status is inconclusive, not green, and a queued/in_progress job is never implicitly green.

Actions: runs, jobs, logs

Navigate run → jobs → one job's log; never download a whole run to read one failure.

gh run list --branch <branch> --limit 20 --json databaseId,name,status,conclusion,headSha
gh api repos/kaeawc/auto-mobile/actions/runs/<RUN_ID>/jobs \
  --jq '.jobs[] | "\(.id)\t\(.status)\t\(.conclusion // "-")\t\(.name)"'

While the run is still going

gh run view <run> --log refuses on an in-progress run (run … is still in progress; logs will be available when it is complete), and the per-job log endpoint 404s (BlobNotFound) for an unfinished job. Neither means waiting for the whole matrix — a finished job's log is readable immediately, even while siblings run:

gh api repos/kaeawc/auto-mobile/actions/jobs/<JOB_ID>/logs

So the live-triage loop is: poll the run's jobs, and pull each job's log the moment its status is completed with conclusion: failure. For a job still executing, step state locates it with no log fetch at all:

gh api repos/kaeawc/auto-mobile/actions/jobs/<JOB_ID> \
  --jq '.name, (.steps[] | "  \(.number)\t\(.status)\t\(.conclusion // "-")\t\(.name)")'

gh run watch <RUN_ID> --exit-status waits to completion without hand-polling.

Extracting the failure

Fetch once to a file, then search — don't re-request per grep:

gh api repos/kaeawc/auto-mobile/actions/jobs/<JOB_ID>/logs > scratch/job-<JOB_ID>.log
grep -nE '##\[error\]|FAIL|✗|Error:|error:' scratch/job-<JOB_ID>.log | head -40

##[error] is the Actions-native marker and the highest-signal pattern. gh run view <RUN_ID> --log-failed works only once the whole run finishes; --job <JOB_ID> --log-failed narrows to one job. gh api --follow does not exist in the installed CLI — use --paginate. If the log is truncated or lacks the failure body, list the run's artifacts and read the relevant one; when gh run download returns an authorization error, report that exact blocker rather than inferring a cause.

Classify before you fix

Every red result is PR-caused, pre-existing on main, transient/infrastructure, or unproven — grounded in the job log, changed paths, and current origin/main. A failure in a subsystem the diff never touches is usually not this PR's. Re-run only on evidence of transience; never change code for an unrelated or unproven failure.

Portability

CI runs macOS legs and this repo lints its own scripts for BSD/GNU portability. Avoid GNU-only invocations in anything you write down: grep -P/grep -oP, sed -i without an argument, readlink -f, mapfile, date -d. Use grep -oE, sed -i '', and awk.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.