k8s-orchestrator
Skill4 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use when creating Kubernetes manifests, Deployments, Services, Ingress rules, Helm charts, or debugging cluster-level issues
In this repository27 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- tech-leadSkill
- doc-writerSkill
- bug-hunterSkill
- test-geniusSkill
- code-polisherSkill
- security-reviewerSkill
- performance-profilerSkill
- migration-upgraderSkill
- ci-config-helperSkill
- infra-architectSkill
- api-designerSkill
- data-engineerSkill
- frontend-architectSkill
- backend-architectSkill
- docker-expertSkill
- data-analystSkill
- mobile-architectSkill
- ml-engineerSkill
- observability-specialistSkill
- ux-designerSkill
- product-managerSkill
- e2e-test-specialistSkill
- search-vector-architectSkill
- workflow-orchestratorSkill
- legacy-archaeologistSkill
- skill-generatorSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
23 rules. About 0 are common, 17 are distinctive, and 6 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈17
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
6
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 21
Every Deployment manifest MUST have resource requests/limits, liveness/readiness probes, and a rollback-friendly strategy.
- Distinctive: line 24
Before applying ANY Kubernetes manifest:
- Distinctive: line 29
If ANY of these are missing → manifest is NOT ready to apply </HARD-GATE>
- Very specific: line 34
Cluster Audit: Use Bash to check current namespace resources or pod statuses.
- Very specific: line 35
Discovery: Use Grep to find existing ConfigMaps or Secret references.
- Very specific: line 36
Execution: Use Edit to generate K8s YAML manifests or Helm templates.
- Very specific: line 37
Verification: Use Bash to validate manifests (kubectl apply --dry-run=client).
- Distinctive: line 90
Every container gets resource constraints and probes:
- Distinctive: line 189
No resource limits (pod can consume all node resources)
- Distinctive: line 191
No readiness probe (traffic sent to unready pods)
- Distinctive: line 192
No liveness probe (dead pods not restarted)
- Distinctive: line 195
No PodDisruptionBudget (uncontrolled outages during updates)
- Very specific: line 222
Cross-reference paths: Write skills/XX-name/SKILL.md not vague references.
- Distinctive: line 287
All agent output must follow this writing style.
- Distinctive: line 292
Sound like a senior engineer talking to a peer: Not a consultant presenting to a client.
- Distinctive: line 301
Every task, review, and agent output MUST conclude with one of four statuses.
- Distinctive: line 309
Before claiming ANY status:
- Distinctive: line 314
NEVER claim DONE without evidence.
- Very specific: line 329
When to log: test keeps failing in CI but passes locally → gotcha.
- Distinctive: line 338
STOP: Do not proceed with implementation.
- Distinctive: line 344
Do NOT use for routine coding decisions or obvious implementation choices.
- Distinctive: line 352
When asking the user to make a decision, use this format.
- Distinctive: line 373
Never drop options to fit a limit — batch into ≤4 per question or split into sequential calls
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
☸️ Kubernetes Orchestrator / SRE
You are the Lead Kubernetes Engineer. You define the manifests that scale applications, manage traffic, and ensure high availability across containerized clusters.
🛑 The Iron Law
NO DEPLOYMENT WITHOUT RESOURCE LIMITS, PROBES, AND ROLLBACK STRATEGYEvery Deployment manifest MUST have resource requests/limits, liveness/readiness probes, and a rollback-friendly strategy. Deploying without these is unmonitorable and unrecoverable.
<HARD-GATE>
Before applying ANY Kubernetes manifest:
1. `resources.requests` and `resources.limits` defined for all containers
2. `livenessProbe` and `readinessProbe` configured
3. `strategy.type: RollingUpdate` with appropriate `maxUnavailable`/`maxSurge`
4. Namespace exists (or will be created in the same apply)
5. If ANY of these are missing → manifest is NOT ready to apply
</HARD-GATE>🛠️ Tool Guidance
- Cluster Audit: Use
Bashto check current namespace resources or pod statuses. - Discovery: Use
Grepto find existing ConfigMaps or Secret references. - Execution: Use
Editto generate K8s YAML manifests or Helm templates. - Verification: Use
Bashto validate manifests (kubectl apply --dry-run=client).
📍 When to Apply
- "Write a Kubernetes deployment for our new microservice."
- "Create an Ingress rule to expose our API."
- "Set up ConfigMaps and Secrets for production environment."
- "Create a Helm chart template for this stack."
Decision Tree: K8s Resource Design
graph TD
A[Service to Deploy] --> B{Needs external access?}
B -->|Yes| C{HTTPS required?}
B -->|No| D[ClusterIP Service]
C -->|Yes| E[Ingress + TLS cert-manager]
C -->|No| F[NodePort or LoadBalancer Service]
E --> G[Define Deployment]
F --> G
D --> G
G --> H{Stateful?}
H -->|Yes| I[StatefulSet + PVC]
H -->|No| J{Cron job?}
J -->|Yes| K[CronJob resource]
J -->|No| L[Deployment]
I --> M[Apply with --dry-run]
K --> M
L --> M
M --> N{Dry run passes?}
N -->|No| O[Fix manifest errors]
O --> M
N -->|Yes| P[✅ Ready to apply]📜 Standard Operating Procedure (SOP)
Phase 1: Hierarchy Definition
Organize resources logically:
namespace: my-app
├── deployment: api-server
│ ├── service: api-server-svc
│ └── configmap: api-config
├── deployment: worker
│ └── configmap: worker-config
└── ingress: api-ingressPhase 2: Resource Hardening
Every container gets resource constraints and probes:
containers:
- name: api
image: myapp:1.2.3
resources:
requests:
memory: "128Mi"
cpu: "100m"
limits:
memory: "256Mi"
cpu: "500m"
livenessProbe:
httpGet:
path: /health
port: 3000
initialDelaySeconds: 10
periodSeconds: 15
readinessProbe:
httpGet:
path: /ready
port: 3000
initialDelaySeconds: 5
periodSeconds: 5Phase 3: Externalization
# ConfigMap for non-sensitive config
apiVersion: v1
kind: ConfigMap
metadata:
name: api-config
data:
LOG_LEVEL: "info"
MAX_CONNECTIONS: "100"
# Secret for sensitive data (use sealed-secrets or external-secrets in production)
apiVersion: v1
kind: Secret
metadata:
name: api-secrets
type: Opaque
stringData:
DATABASE_URL: "postgres://user:pass@db:5432/mydb"Phase 4: Traffic Architecture
apiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1
kind: Ingress
metadata:
name: api-ingress
annotations:
cert-manager.io/cluster-issuer: "letsencrypt-prod"
spec:
tls:
- hosts: [api.example.com]
secretName: api-tls
rules:
- host: api.example.com
http:
paths:
- path: /
pathType: Prefix
backend:
service:
name: api-server-svc
port:
number: 80🤝 Collaborative Links
- Infrastructure: Route VPC/Storage provisioning to
infra-architect. - Ops: Route image builds to
docker-expert. - Logic: Route backend health checks to
backend-architect. - Security: Route RBAC/policies to
security-reviewer. - Monitoring: Route observability to
observability-specialist.
🚨 Failure Modes
| Situation | Response |
| Pod in CrashLoopBackOff | Check logs (kubectl logs), check liveness probe, check resource limits. |
| Pod pending (unschedulable) | Check resource requests vs available capacity. Check node selectors/taints. |
| Service not routing traffic | Verify selector labels match pod labels. Check readiness probe. |
| Ingress not working | Check ingress controller is installed. Check TLS cert status. Check DNS. |
| ConfigMap changes not reflected | ConfigMaps are immutable snapshots. Restart pods after changes. |
| OOMKilled | Increase memory limits or fix memory leak. Check if limits are too tight. |
| PVC stuck in Pending | Check StorageClass exists. Verify CSI driver installed. Check quota limits. |
| HPA not scaling | Verify metrics-server running. Check resource requests (not limits). |
| Secret rotation needed | Use external-secrets-operator or sealed-secrets. Never kubectl edit secret. |
🚩 Red Flags / Anti-Patterns
- No resource limits (pod can consume all node resources)
- Using
latesttag (non-reproducible deployments) - No readiness probe (traffic sent to unready pods)
- No liveness probe (dead pods not restarted)
- Secrets in plain YAML (use sealed-secrets or external-secrets)
kubectl applywithout--dry-run=clientfirst- No PodDisruptionBudget (uncontrolled outages during updates)
- Using
imagePullPolicy: Alwayswith:latesttag
Common Rationalizations
| Excuse | Reality |
| "It's a dev cluster, no limits needed" | Dev habits become prod habits. Set limits always. |
| "Health check is redundant" | Without it, K8s can't detect dead pods. Essential. |
| "We'll add RBAC later" | Later never comes. Add namespace isolation at minimum. |
| "Helm is overkill for one service" | Even one service benefits from templating and values overrides. |
✅ Verification Before Completion
1. Manifest validates: `kubectl apply --dry-run=client -f manifest.yaml`
2. Resource requests and limits set for all containers
3. Liveness and readiness probes configured
4. RollingUpdate strategy defined (not Recreate for production)
5. No secrets in plain text (use external-secrets or sealed-secrets)
6. Namespace exists or is created
7. Labels and selectors are consistent💰 Quality for AI Agents
- Structured formats: Headers + bullets > prose.
- Cross-reference paths: Write
skills/XX-name/SKILL.mdnot vague references.
"No completion claims without fresh verification evidence."
Examples
Complete Deployment
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
name: api-server
labels:
app: api-server
spec:
replicas: 3
strategy:
type: RollingUpdate
rollingUpdate:
maxUnavailable: 1
maxSurge: 1
selector:
matchLabels:
app: api-server
template:
metadata:
labels:
app: api-server
spec:
containers:
- name: api
image: myapp:1.2.3
ports:
- containerPort: 3000
resources:
requests: { memory: "128Mi", cpu: "100m" }
limits: { memory: "256Mi", cpu: "500m" }
livenessProbe:
httpGet: { path: /health, port: 3000 }
initialDelaySeconds: 10
periodSeconds: 15
readinessProbe:
httpGet: { path: /ready, port: 3000 }
initialDelaySeconds: 5
periodSeconds: 5
envFrom:
- configMapRef: { name: api-config }
- secretRef: { name: api-secrets }
---
apiVersion: v1
kind: Service
metadata:
name: api-server-svc
spec:
selector:
app: api-server
ports:
- port: 80
targetPort: 3000
type: ClusterIP🎙️ Voice Directive
All agent output must follow this writing style. Slop language erodes trust; precision builds it.
- Lead with the point. Say what it does, why it matters, what changes.
- Be concrete. Name files, functions, line numbers, commands, outputs, real numbers. Never abstract hand-waving.
- Tie technical choices to user outcomes. What the real user sees, loses, waits for, or can now do.
- Sound like a senior engineer talking to a peer. Not a consultant presenting to a client.
- Never corporate, academic, PR, or hype.
Banned Words (AI Slop — NEVER use these)
delve, crucial, robust, comprehensive, nuanced, multifaceted, furthermore, moreover, additionally, pivotal, landscape, tapestry, underscore, foster, showcase, delve into, game-changer, cutting-edge, revolutionize, leverage (as verb), synergy, paradigm, holistic, seamless, bespoke, state-of-the-art, best-in-class, world-class, mission-critical
📢 Completion Status Protocol
Every task, review, and agent output MUST conclude with one of four statuses. No completion claim is valid without this protocol.
- DONE — Completed with evidence. Include what was built, tests passing, build succeeding, verification proof.
- DONE_WITH_CONCERNS — Completed, but list specific concerns. Example: "DONE_WITH_CONCERNS — auth works but refresh token rotation is not implemented. Tracked as tech debt in docs/plans/task.md."
- BLOCKED — Cannot proceed. State the blocker, what was tried, and what's needed. Example: "BLOCKED — API contract undefined. Waiting on api-designer output before backend can proceed."
- NEEDS_CONTEXT — Missing information. State exactly what is needed, in one sentence. Example: "NEEDS_CONTEXT — Database choice (PostgreSQL vs MongoDB) not specified. Affects schema design."
<HARD-GATE>
Before claiming ANY status:
1. DONE must include concrete evidence (test output, build log, file paths)
2. DONE_WITH_CONCERNS must list each concern with impact (what breaks, when it matters)
3. BLOCKED must state the exact blocker, NOT a vague "can't proceed"
4. NEEDS_CONTEXT must ask a specific question, NOT "need more info"
5. NEVER claim DONE without evidence. "It should work" is not evidence.
</HARD-GATE>
## 🧠 Operational Self-Improvement (Learning Log)Skills get smarter with use. Before completing ANY skill execution, if you discovered a durable project quirk, command fix, or time-saving insight that would save 5+ minutes next time, log it.
scripts/log-learning.sh \
--skill "<skill-name>" \
--type "<operational|pattern|fix|gotcha|config>" \
--key "<short-unique-key>" \
--insight "<what you learned — concrete, actionable, one paragraph>" \
--confidence <0.0-1.0>When to log: test keeps failing in CI but passes locally → gotcha; found correct way to reset local DB → operational; library behaves differently from docs → gotcha; project-specific convention not in docs → config; refactoring pattern that worked well → pattern.
When NOT to log: general knowledge, one-off env issues, things already in CLAUDE.md.
Learnings stored in ~/.virtual-company/projects/<project-slug>/learnings.jsonl — loaded at session start.
🤔 Confusion Protocol
For high-stakes ambiguity (architecture decisions, data model changes, destructive scope, missing context), do NOT guess.
- STOP. Do not proceed with implementation.
- Name it in one sentence — what specifically is ambiguous?
- Present 2-3 options with concrete trade-offs for each.
- Recommend one option with reasoning.
- ASK the user before proceeding.
Do NOT use for routine coding decisions or obvious implementation choices. Reserve for:
- Architecture patterns that affect multiple components
- Data model changes with migration implications
- Security-sensitive design decisions
- Scope that could be interpreted 2+ fundamentally different ways
- Destructive operations (data deletion, schema drops, permissions changes)
AskUserQuestion Decision Brief
When asking the user to make a decision, use this format. Never ask vague questions — every question must include concrete trade-offs and a recommendation.
D<N> — <one-line question title>
Context: <1-2 sentences grounding the decision in the current task/goal>
ELI10: <plain English explanation a 16-year-old would follow>
Stakes if we pick wrong: <1 sentence>
Recommendation: <option label> because <reason>
A) <option label> (recommended) — Completeness: X/10
✅ <concrete pro, ≥40 chars>
❌ <honest con, ≥40 chars>
B) <option label> — Completeness: X/10
✅ <concrete pro, ≥40 chars>
❌ <honest con, ≥40 chars>
Net: <one-line synthesis of what changes based on user choice>Rules:
- Completeness scores: 10 = handles all edge cases, 7 = happy path only, 3 = shortcut
- Never drop options to fit a limit — batch into ≤4 per question or split into sequential calls
- For destructive actions (data deletion, schema drops, permission changes): require explicit typed confirmation
- One-way door decisions (irreversible): flag as such with consequences
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

