agentleFS
jzhao234jzhao234/big-brain/skills/claude/weekly/SKILL.md

weekly

Skill1 starsChanged 32 days agoMITView on GitHub

Run the weekly review of the big-brain second brain: triage the inbox, walk active projects, reschedule or drop overdue tasks, check vault health, and write a review summary. Use when the user types /weekly, or asks for a "weekly review", "review my projects", "clean up my brain", "triage my inbox".

  • Commits and pushes

17 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use decide, setup and 2 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • dirienSkill

    decide

    Three-agent adversarial debate protocol for strategic decisions. Two advocates steelman opposing positions while a moderator identifies risks and synthesizes a binding consensus. Use when choosing between alternatives, evaluating tradeoffs, or making high-stakes decisions.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • VercelSkill

    setup

    Set up Vercel CLI and project configuration. Use when the user says "set up Vercel", "configure Vercel", "link to Vercel", or "vercel init".

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • SentrySkill

    onboard

    Onboard a service to sentry-options. Use when integrating a new service, creating schemas, or setting up the multi-repo sentry-options workflow.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • SentrySkill

    review

    Fixture review skill.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

Files
SKILL.md

weekly

A guided review of the big-brain vault (whichever big-brain resolves via BIG_BRAIN_VAULT, --vault, or the nearest brain.config.json). Work through it with the user: propose, confirm, act. The outcome: an empty inbox, honest project statuses, a task list that reflects reality, and a written record.

Order of operations

  1. Snapshot. big-brain status + big-brain doctor. Lead with the two or three things that most need attention (overdue tasks, stale projects, inbox pileup, broken links).
  2. Inbox triage. For each note in the inbox, propose exactly one destination: merge into an existing note/project, become a new linked note, become tasks, or archive. Batch the proposals, get one confirmation, execute, archive the processed captures.
  3. Project walk. For each active project: last Log entries, open tasks, blockers. Ask the one question that matters: is this still active? Update statuses (big-brain project status <ref> paused|done|dropped): a shorter honest list beats an impressive stale one. For projects untouched for 2+ weeks, suggest a concrete next task or a status change.
  4. Task hygiene. Overdue tasks get one of: do-this-week (new due date), someday (drop the date), or dead (remove). Never let a due date silently roll forward twice: that's a signal the task is mis-scoped or unwanted; say so.
  5. Doctor fixes. Fix broken wikilinks and duplicate names found in step 1 where the fix is obvious; list the rest.
  6. Consolidate. The doctor's bloated-note and possible-duplicate findings are the queue; big-brain related <note> shows what a note overlaps with. Propose (never apply unconfirmed): split a bloated note's grown sections into linked notes; merge near-duplicates into one canonical note (archive the loser, keep its title as an alias); prune stale facts: while reading project notes in step 3, flag statements that no longer hold (old statuses, superseded decisions, dead links to reality) and update or strike them. One batch of proposals, user confirms, execute. Memory that never gets consolidated rots; this step is why the vault stays trustworthy.
  7. Write the record. Append a short summary to today's daily note Log: projects reviewed, status changes, inbox items processed, consolidations made, what the user said matters next week. If the vault has git auto-commit enabled, the review's edits commit and push on their own; otherwise commit at the end (git -C <vault> add -A && git commit -m "weekly review <date>" && git push).

Tone

This is a working meeting, not a report. Short exchanges, concrete proposals, sensible defaults ("I'd archive these three. Any objections?"). The user's time budget is ~10 minutes; don't stretch it.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.