agentleFS
jyjeannejyjeanne/ditacraft/.github/skills/writing-commit-messages/SKILL.md

writing-commit-messages

Skill19 starsChanged 32 days agoMITView on GitHub

Write clear, conventional commit messages with proper type prefixes, scopes, and body content.

15 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

10 rules. 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 13 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 8

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Write commit messages that are useful for humans and machines.

    line 9
  2. Distinctive:

    Use imperative mood: "add feature" not "added feature" or "adding feature"

    line 24
  3. Distinctive:

    Don't capitalize the first letter after the type prefix

    line 25
  4. Distinctive:

    No period at the end

    line 26
  5. Distinctive:

    Don't mix refactoring with feature work in the same commit

    line 94
  6. Distinctive:

    Don't commit half-working code (use git stash instead)

    line 95
  7. Distinctive:

    Commit early and often on feature branches, squash before merge if needed

    line 96
  8. Distinctive:

    If the commit introduces a breaking change:

    line 100
  9. Very specific:

    Add ! after the type: feat(api)!: change auth token format

    line 101
  10. Very specific:

    Add BREAKING CHANGE: in the footer with migration instructions

    line 102

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 13 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Writing Commit Messages

Write commit messages that are useful for humans and machines.

Format

<type>(<optional scope>): <subject>

<optional body>

<optional footer>

Subject Line Rules

  • 50 characters or less for the subject
  • Use imperative mood: "add feature" not "added feature" or "adding feature"
  • Don't capitalize the first letter after the type prefix
  • No period at the end

Types

TypeWhen to use
featNew user-facing feature
fixBug fix
refactorCode restructuring without behavior change
docsDocumentation changes
testAdding or updating tests
choreBuild, CI, tooling, deps
perfPerformance improvement
styleFormatting, whitespace (not CSS)
ciCI/CD pipeline changes
revertReverting a previous commit

Scope (Optional)

The area of the codebase affected:

  • feat(auth): add OAuth2 login flow
  • fix(api): handle null response from payments endpoint
  • refactor(db): extract query builder into module

Body (When Needed)

Explain why, not what (the diff shows what):

fix(checkout): prevent duplicate order submissions

The submit button was not disabled after the first click,
allowing users to create multiple orders. This caused
duplicate charges in Stripe.

Footer (When Needed)

BREAKING CHANGE: rename `getUserById` to `findUser`

Closes #456
Co-authored-by: Name <email>

Examples

Good:

feat(dashboard): add real-time notification bell
fix: resolve race condition in WebSocket reconnect
refactor(api): consolidate error handling middleware
test: add integration tests for payment webhook
chore: upgrade TypeScript to 5.4

Bad:

fixed stuff
WIP
update
changes
asdf

When to Commit

  • Each commit should represent one logical change
  • Don't mix refactoring with feature work in the same commit
  • Don't commit half-working code (use git stash instead)
  • Commit early and often on feature branches, squash before merge if needed

Breaking Changes

If the commit introduces a breaking change:

  1. Add ! after the type: feat(api)!: change auth token format
  2. Add BREAKING CHANGE: in the footer with migration instructions

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.