agentleFS
jwm-axonijwm-axoni/claude-workbench/skills/schedules/SKILL.md

schedules

Skill2 starsChanged 6 days agoMITView on GitHub

Create, update or remove the workbench's scheduled routines so they exactly match .workbench/schedules.json. Finds every existing "[Workbench] …" scheduled task (and older look-alikes), then updates, replaces, deletes or creates as needed, never leaving duplicates. Use after setup or migrate, when someone changes their hours or turns a routine on or off, or says "fix my scheduled tasks", "my briefing didn't run", /workbench:schedules.

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

  • Other versions1 project uses a version of this.

    Word for word · 0

    None found.

    Edited · 0

    None found.

    Wrote their own version · 1

    1. vercel-labs/hatchery★ 7same name

    How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.

  • In this repository10 other files it gives its agents.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈5

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Add this to the end of each prompt:

    line 52
  2. Distinctive:

    Look-alikes: not prefixed, but clearly an older version of the same job, e.g.

    line 89
  3. Distinctive:

    Unrelated: leave alone and don't mention them.

    line 95
  4. Distinctive:

    If two tasks map to the same routine, that's a duplicate.

    line 97
  5. Distinctive:

    If the tool supports it, turn on notifications only for failures.

    line 116

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Workbench schedules

Make the real scheduled tasks match the desired set. Desired state lives in the workbench at .workbench/schedules.json. Regenerate it first so it reflects the current profile:

python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/workbench.py" schedules --root "<workbench>"

Each routine there has id, name (always [Workbench] …), cron, timezone, when (human text) and prompt. The prompt is deliberately short: it invokes the plugin skill, with the copy in .workbench/routines/ as a fallback, so upgrading the plugin upgrades the routines without touching the schedule.

1. Pick the runner

The routines need to read and write the workbench folder, so where they run decides what's guaranteed. The runner follows from two facts in .workbench/profile.json: which surface the owner has (surface: cowork or code) and where the vault lives (vault_home: local or repo). Setup records both. Don't ask the owner to pick a runner; derive it:

You haveThe vault lives inRoutines run onWhat's guaranteed
Cowork onlya local folderCowork localRuns only while the computer is on and the desktop app is open. No documented catch-up: the run ledger and gap detection recover missed runs.
Cowork onlya private GitHub repo, worked from a local cloneCowork local, on the cloneRuns only while the computer is on and the desktop app is open. No documented catch-up: the run ledger and gap detection recover missed runs. The repo adds backup, history and safe use from more than one computer.
Claude Codea local folderCode Desktop localRuns while the desktop app is open. Exactly one catch-up run for the most recent missed run within 7 days.
Claude Codea private GitHub repo, worked from a local cloneCode cloudRuns with the laptop closed. Research preview: fresh clone per run, pushes to claude/ branches, minimum interval one hour. No documented catch-up: the run ledger and gap detection cover misses.

Store the result as runner in the profile (cowork-local, code-desktop, code-cloud).

Runner 1, Cowork local (Cowork-only users). Scheduled tasks in Cowork, against the local vault folder (or the local clone of a repo vault). They run only while the computer is on and the desktop app is open. A task that needs local files runs locally even where Cowork can run tasks in the cloud. Anthropic documents no catch-up, retry or failure notice for this case, so recovery is built into the routines: each one appends to Tracking/Signals/RUN_LEDGER.md, the briefing names any routine missing from it, the dream files every unprocessed capture whatever its date, and the recap writes a reconstructed file for a missed day.

Runner 2, Code Desktop local (Code users, local vault). Scheduled tasks in the Claude Code desktop app. Documented behavior: on wake or app start, exactly one catch-up run for the most recent missed run within 7 days; older misses are skipped and listed in the task's History. The run ledger still records every run, so the briefing can tell a catch-up from a skip.

Runner 3, Code cloud (Code users, repo vault). Cloud scheduled tasks against the private GitHub repo. A research preview. Each run starts from a fresh clone, can push only to claude/ branches, and the minimum interval is one hour. No catch-up and no automatic retry are documented. Add this to the end of each prompt:

"The workbench is the repository <owner/repo>. Before reading anything, fetch and merge every unmerged claude/workbench-* branch into your working copy, so you see the earlier runs' work; if a merge conflicts, stop, append a failed line to the run ledger naming the branches, and push nothing else. When done, commit only the files this routine owns, with message <routine-id>: YYYY-MM-DD, and push to the branch claude/workbench-<routine-id>-YYYY-MM-DD. Never force-push."

The owner's side is one ritual: the first local session of the day pulls and merges the claude/ branches before the briefing reads the vault (or the owner merges the newest one in one click on GitHub; each branch already contains the earlier ones). Because each routine commits only files it owns, merges conflict only where git can show it. If cloud tasks are unavailable or switched off for the account, fall back to Runner 2 against the local clone; never run both for the same routine.

Plan notes. On Team and Enterprise plans, Cowork sessions run in the cloud only if the organization turns on "Run Cowork in the cloud" (Organization settings > Cowork), and even then a task that requires local files runs locally. On personal plans there's no location choice. Either way, a workbench in a local folder runs locally.

What isn't a scheduler. A session-only cron (one that dies when the chat closes) is not a scheduler for this; don't use it. If the tools for the derived runner aren't in this session (for example, Cowork-only and you're in a plain chat), write the table from schedules.json into your reply and tell them how to create the tasks by hand in the Claude desktop app (the Scheduled section) with each prompt. Stop there.

Duplicates across surfaces. The same routine can exist on more than one surface (a Cowork task and a Code Desktop task, or a desktop task and a cloud task). Inventory every surface you can see in step 2, and keep exactly one per routine, on the derived runner.

2. Inventory what exists

List every scheduled task you can see. Sort each into:

  • Ours, current: name starts with [Workbench] and matches a desired id/name.
  • Ours, retired: name starts with [Workbench] but no desired routine has that name.
  • Look-alikes: not prefixed, but clearly an older version of the same job, e.g. "daily briefing", "vault-dream", "EOD recap", "weekly plan", or any task whose prompt points at this workbench folder. Show these to the person and ask, one line each: replace with the workbench version, or leave alone? Replacing means pausing (disabling) the old task, not deleting it, so its wording survives and it can be switched back on. Delete only if the tool can't pause, and only with an explicit yes.
  • Unrelated: leave alone and don't mention them.

If two tasks map to the same routine, that's a duplicate. Keep one (prefer the one already named correctly) and delete the other after saying so.

3. Reconcile

Show the plan as one small table (routine · action · when) and get a yes, then apply it:

SituationAction
desired, not presentcreate with the exact name, cron, timezone, prompt
present, cron/prompt/timezone differupdate in place (keeps its history); if the tool can't update, delete then create
present and identicalleave it
ours, retireddelete
look-alike the person said to replacepause it, then create ours

Cron expressions are in the routine's timezone. If the scheduling tool only accepts UTC, convert it and note the conversion, since daylight saving shifts it twice a year; prefer a tool option that takes a timezone when there is one.

If the tool supports it, turn on notifications only for failures. Nobody needs six pings a day.

4. Verify and record

  1. List tasks again and confirm each desired routine exists exactly once with the right schedule.
  2. Offer to run the Morning Briefing once now as a test, and look at the file it wrote.
  3. Append to Tracking/FRICTION_LOG.md under ## Resolved one line: today's date, "routines reconciled", and what was created, updated or deleted. That's the audit trail if a routine later goes missing.

Finish with the final table: routine, when (in their timezone), where it runs.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.