wiki-review
Skill1 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use when the user runs /review, says "show pending changes", "what's uncommitted", or wants an audit of uncommitted wiki edits before they land in history. Narrates uncommitted changes, flags structural issues scoped to those changes, and commits them with a conventional subject. Fully automatic.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 7 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 37
If any flag fires, list them.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 7 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
wiki-review
Audits and commits the uncommitted diff on wiki paths. Intended for hand-edits or mid-ingest interruptions; a normal /ingest already commits on its own.
Refuse conditions
- No
.llm-wiki.yamlin CWD or ancestors. .llm-wiki.yaml:schema_version != 1.- Working tree clean on
wiki/andindex.md— nothing to review.
Workflow
1. Narrate the diff
git status -- wiki/ index.md raw/git diff --stat -- wiki/ index.md- For each changed file,
git diff <file>and report:- Changed sections (heading / frontmatter / list / prose).
- Frontmatter invariants:
updated:bumped to today;sources:appended not replaced;contradictions:entries well-shaped. - Literal change narration for hand-edits; no inferred motivation.
2. Structural flags scoped to changed files
Using the resolution rules in skills/wiki-ingest/reference.md:
- New dead
[[link]](zero hits). - New ambiguous
[[link]](multiple hits). - New orphan page (created without any inbound link and not covered by
lint.orphan_allowlist). - New
contradictions:entries. - Index drift: new page missing from
index.md, or an index entry pointing to a now-missing page.
If any flag fires, list them. They do not block the commit.
3. Pick commit scope
- Single file under
wiki/→revise(<page-slug>): <first-heading-of-diff-or-filename>. - Multi-file under
wiki/→revise(multi): <count> page(s). - Includes
.llm-wiki.yamlor other config changes → split: commit wiki changes first with a wiki scope, then commit config withchore: <summary>. - Includes
raw/additions without a correspondingwiki/sources/<slug>.md→ refuse: raw without a source page means an ingest was interrupted; run/ingestto complete it.
4. Commit
git add <explicit-paths>
git commit -m "<scope>: <subject>"Never git add ..
Output
Single block:
Reviewed <N> file(s). Flags: <count or "none">. Committed as <short-sha> <scope>: <subject>.Other versions9 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 9
- IssacW228/student-llm-wiki★ 173same name
- VintLin/zettelkasten★ 4same name
- k79k06k02k/llm-project-wiki★ 2same name
- dexio-wiki/llm-wiki-skills★ 1same name
- hmjBill/skills★ 1same name
- nathanaday/almagest★ 1same name
- nathanaday/atlas-obsidian★ 1same name
- nathanaday/claude-atlas★ 1same name
- boaz-hwang/boaz-wiki★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
Used alongsideProjects with it also use almagest, almagest-onboard and 9 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
nathanadaySkillalmagest
Orient in the Almagest vault, say what waits for the user, do the work a request asks in a linked repository, and route any other request to the skill that owns it. Use for /almagest, what is going on, status, what waits for me, where do I work on X, work on X, fix this, implement, build, note this, remember to, publish my journal, what is in my journals, and any request when the right skill is not clear. Keeping part of this conversation is wiki-save; files to learn from are wiki-ingest.
Also in 3 projects that use this
nathanadaySkillalmagest-onboard
Make a new Almagest vault: ask its name, its folder, and how freely to tag, then link its first repositories. Use for set up almagest, new vault, start a vault here, onboard, make this folder a vault. Linking a repository to a vault that exists is repo-link.
Also in 3 projects that use this
suwonleeeSkillwiki-save
Session close-out (warm, O(this session)) — file THIS session into the log, consolidate its durable concepts into the topic encyclopedia (5_topic), refresh L0 (current-state), finish with overview·lint. The every-session habit; volume work (backlog · review · gaps · re-distill) defers to the periodic `/wiki-deep` deep pass
Also in 3 projects that use this
richard-kim-79Skillwiki-sync
Organizes research notes into a structured wiki knowledge base with wikilinks ([[slug]] syntax), cross-references, and an auto-generated index. Use when the user asks to build a wiki, organize notes into a knowledge base, create an index, or sync notes into a structured format.
Also in 3 projects that use this
- +7 more from nathanaday
In this repository6 other files it gives its agents.
- stubs/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- wiki-bootstrapSkill
- wiki-historySkill
- wiki-ingestSkill
- wiki-lintSkill
- wiki-querySkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

