project-memory
Skill2 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use when maintaining project state, decisions, evidence, or a handoff that must survive a new session.
24 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- CheehooLabs/SpureeSkillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- cobibean/project-memory-skilltheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- RRFRRF/project-memory-skilltheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- xuyewild/multi-ai-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- kaushikhegde11/obsidian-project-memorytheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- mooktakim/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 17, 2026
Other versions24 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 24
- SpillwaveSolutions/project-memory★ 88same name
- CheehooLabs/SpureeSkills★ 18same name
- RRFRRF/project-memory-skill★ 8same name
- scaleto/Antigravity-Super-Skill-Architecture★ 8same name
- cobibean/project-memory-skill★ 7same name
- me-cedric/agent-compass★ 3same name
- tasuku-9/project-memory-skill★ 3same name
- sakuruamayday-ops/enterprise-project-application-assistant★ 2same name
- g030105021203-cell/project-memory★ 1same name
- ImpartialTruth/project-memory-skill★ 1same name
14 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository7 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- design-brief-directionSkill
- ui-polishSkill
- legacy-contractsSkill
- natural-writing-humanizationSkill
- project-notesSkill
- spec-artifactsSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 19 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 8
Use the project's existing record entrypoint, such as CURRENT.md, for the active objective, constraints, next action, and links.
- Very specific: line 14
Read references/current-state.md when updating current state or resuming work.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 19 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Project Memory
Use the project's existing record entrypoint, such as CURRENT.md, for the active objective, constraints, next action, and links. Read only relevant records, narrowing by repository, topic, month, kind, or path where supported before expanding. Ordinary edits do not require a new worklog.
Record meaningful milestones, decisions, important findings, blockers, and handoffs. Keep current reusable facts in topic knowledge and detailed evidence in dated worklogs, using monthly folders for the new layout. Preserve existing records, ownership, source locators, and local-only rules; distinguish intended contracts, implementation, configuration, and observed behavior.
Shared workspace records apply only to explicitly registered members. Confirm the selected repository before code or Git operations; record location alone does not select a code target. Records do not require Git.
Read references/current-state.md when updating current state or resuming work. Read references/evidence-and-handoff.md for detailed evidence, handoffs, or an optional independent DRAFT. The main task normally records its own work; it reviews delegated drafts before incorporation. Native host memory is optional; ordinary files are sufficient.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

