agentleFS
juanASPjuanASP/mercury/skills/outreach-tracker/SKILL.md

outreach-tracker

Skill0 starsChanged 5 months agoUnlicenseView on GitHub

Review open LinkedIn outreach and run the follow-up lifecycle: compute what's due today (gentle nudges, invitation withdrawals, close-outs), draft the text for each, and detect replies — all surfaced for explicit user approval. Never auto-sends. Updates Mercury's outreach memory and InMail-credit budget as actions are taken. Good for a scheduled daily run. Part of the Mercury job search toolkit.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈2

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    If they replied after your last message, mark it engaged and stop automation for that person:

    line 64
  2. Distinctive:

    No send needed. Mark unresponsive (company-blocks them):

    line 112

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Outreach Tracker

Drive the outreach follow-up lifecycle from Mercury's relationship memory: find what needs action today, draft each message/withdrawal/close, and apply the state change once the user approves. This is the companion to recruiter-outreach (which initiates outreach and records attempts); the tracker maintains them.

Core principle: draft + ask, never auto-send

require_send_consent is on by default. This skill drafts messages and proposes actions; the human approves each one before anything is sent or withdrawn on LinkedIn. Do not send, message, or withdraw without explicit per-action consent.

Prerequisites

  • Mercury CLI — mercury outreach due|update|blocked|budget
  • LinkedIn MCP — get_inbox, get_conversation (reply detection), send_message (approved nudges)
  • Chrome MCP — for invitation withdrawal (no MCP withdraw tool exists)

Workflow

1. Find what's due

mercury outreach due

Each line is one of three action kinds with the person, company, and reason:

  • [WITHDRAW] — an invite has gone unaccepted past the threshold (~7d).
  • [FOLLOWUP] — they accepted but haven't replied to your first message (~4d).
  • [CLOSE] — your follow-up went unanswered past the grace window (~7d).

Also glance at the InMail budget so you can factor credit cost into any InMail-based follow-ups:

mercury outreach budget

2. Detect replies FIRST (before acting on anything)

A reply rescues an attempt from any cadence — never nudge or close someone who already responded. For each due item (and any accepted/followed_up attempt), check the conversation:

get_conversation(linkedin_username = "{username}")   # or search_conversations / get_inbox

If they replied after your last message, mark it engaged and stop automation for that person:

mercury outreach update --id {attemptId} --state engaged --reason "replied: {gist}"

Marking engaged also refunds an InMail credit if one was spent within the 90-day window — the budget updates automatically.

3. Handle each remaining due action (with consent)

[FOLLOWUP] — accepted, no reply: Draft a short, friendly nudge (≤ ~400 chars, specific, no guilt-trip). Show it to the user. On approval, send and record:

send_message(linkedin_username = "{username}", message = "{approved text}", confirm_send = true)
mercury outreach update --id {attemptId} --state followed_up --reason "gentle nudge sent"

[WITHDRAW] — invite ignored: Explain you'll withdraw the pending invitation (recalling the note). The LinkedIn MCP has no withdraw tool, so drive the browser with Chrome MCP:

chrome: navigate_page("https://www.linkedin.com/mynetwork/invitation-manager/sent/")
chrome: take_snapshot            # locate the row for {Name}
chrome: click(<the person's "Withdraw" button>)
chrome: handle_dialog(accept)    # confirm if prompted

Then record the outcome (this also company-blocks them so they're skipped in future recruiter-outreach runs):

mercury outreach update --id {attemptId} --state invite_ignored --reason "invite withdrawn after {N}d"

Or use mercury outreach withdraw --id {attemptId} — it marks the block and, if the browser step couldn't be confirmed, degrades gracefully (the invite may still linger on LinkedIn; the block bookkeeping still happens).

Caveats to tell the user: LinkedIn blocks re-inviting a withdrawn person for ~3 weeks; weekly invite limits still apply; sent notes can't be edited (only withdrawn).

[CLOSE] — follow-up exhausted: No send needed. Mark unresponsive (company-blocks them):

mercury outreach update --id {attemptId} --state unresponsive --reason "no reply after follow-up"

4. Summarize

Present a short table of what was done and what's pending approval:

PersonCompanyActionStatus
NameCompanyFOLLOWUP / WITHDRAW / CLOSE / ENGAGEDsent / withdrawn / closed / awaiting approval

Note the updated InMail budget (credits remaining vs reserve floor) if any InMail action was taken or refunded.

Notes

  • A block is scoped to (person, company URN) and expires after the configured cooldown (default 9 months) — the tracker doesn't permanently burn a contact.
  • Reply detection is best-effort; if the inbox tools can't confirm a reply, fall back to asking the user "did {Name} reply?" before nudging or closing.
  • This skill is safe to run on a daily schedule: with consent gating on, the worst case is a list of drafts awaiting your approval.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.