implement-next
Skill3 starsChanged 3 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Use after synthesis to dispatch the next ready task from the TASKS.md ledger through one subagent-driven implementation cycle, one task per invocation.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- javrasya/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 11, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- javrasya/skills★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository15 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- final-reviewSkill
- grill-changeSkill
- request-to-spec-issuesSkill
- sdd-changeSkill
- subagent-driven-changeSkill
- tdd-changeSkill
- final-reviewSkill
- grill-changeSkill
- implement-nextSkill
- request-to-spec-issuesSkill
- sdd-changeSkill
- subagent-driven-changeSkill
- tdd-changeSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
12 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 7 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈5
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
7
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 17
If TASKS.md is missing or contains no ready task, stop and report the ledger state.
- Very specific: line 21
Read TASKS.md and select the first task in state ready.
- Very specific: line 22
Stop at a human-gate task and explain the approval it needs.
- Very specific: line 24
If no ready task exists, stop and report.
- Very specific: line 28
If the validated handoff reports NO_PROGRESS or NEEDS_HUMAN_REVIEW, report that outcome and its required escalation.
- Very specific: line 32
Stop and report BLOCKED when any of these holds:
- Distinctive: line 46
Do not upload source code.
- Distinctive: line 47
Do not read or print secrets.
- Distinctive: line 48
Do not iterate across tasks.
- Distinctive: line 49
Do not self-approve; all writes, commits, and destructive steps go through the client's write-approval flow.
- Distinctive: line 50
Do not edit issue briefs or advance a task that failed.
- Very specific: line 51
Do not propose bypassPermissions, tool pre-approval, dependency auto-installation, hosted execution, or remote MCP behavior.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
<!-- Generated by Agent Profile Compiler. Do not edit by hand. -->Implement Next
Purpose
Advance exactly one ready task from the TASKS.md ledger through a single implementation cycle, using its persisted issue brief as context. One invocation advances at most one task; it never iterates. Repeat the command for the next task.
Preconditions
TASKS.mdexists and is an index-only ledger whose rows link to issue briefs.- If
TASKS.mdis missing or contains noreadytask, stop and report the ledger state; do not invent work.
Flow
- Read
TASKS.mdand select the first task in stateready.- Stop at a
human-gatetask and explain the approval it needs; do not proceed past it. - Skip
blockedandsequencedtasks; they are not ready. - If no
readytask exists, stop and report.
- Stop at a
- Mark the selected task
in-progressinTASKS.mdthrough the client's write-approval flow. - Load the linked issue brief and run
subagent-driven-changewith the brief as Fresh Context. Its owner runscode-quality-reviewerbeforechange-risk-reviewer; initiate or resume the closed change-risk handoff and report its current state, but do not independently invoke another review, redefine budgets, or reset counters. - Mark the task
doneonly after the owner returns a validated terminalCLEANhandoff and required tests run green. Validate the closedChangeRiskOrchestrationStateV1record; its snapshot matches the current snapshot (modulodocs/review-learning/) and its terminal status isCLEAN. Do not infer completion from free-form prose or an unvalidated status. The next task requires a new invocation. - If the validated handoff reports
NO_PROGRESSorNEEDS_HUMAN_REVIEW, report that outcome and its required escalation; do not mark the taskdoneor start another review. Keep the task out ofdoneuntil a human resolves the escalation.
Failure Path
Stop and report BLOCKED when any of these holds:
implementerreturnsBLOCKEDorNEEDS_CONTEXT,- a review finding cannot be resolved within the brief's scope,
- GREEN is unreachable within the brief's declared seam.
On failure, mark the task blocked in TASKS.md with a one-line reason; if the declared seam was wrong, include why it failed. Then stop. Do not touch the next task, do not edit the brief, and do not continue to another task. A human decides whether to edit the brief, re-grill, or split the task, and flips the state back to ready.
Output
Report the selected task, the state transitions applied, the subagent results, the tests run, the change-risk handoff status when applicable, and the final state (done or blocked with its one-line reason).
Safety
- Do not upload source code.
- Do not read or print secrets.
- Do not iterate across tasks; one invocation advances at most one task.
- Do not self-approve; all writes, commits, and destructive steps go through the client's write-approval flow.
- Do not edit issue briefs or advance a task that failed.
- Do not propose
bypassPermissions, tool pre-approval, dependency auto-installation, hosted execution, or remote MCP behavior.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

